California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 3090 — State property: Department of the California Highway Patrol.

Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the Director of General Services to acquire and convey real property for the state, whenever that transfer of the real property is authorized or contemplated by law. This bill would authorize the director to sell, lease, exchange, or any combination thereof, all or a portion of the Pacific Highway Property, located at 4902 Pacific Highway in the City of San Diego, currently used by the Department of the California Highway Patrol as its San Diego area office, that is specifically declared not to be surplus to the needs of the state, and in return, to acquire land and facilities to provide a substitute location capable of accommodating its presently necessary and received future expansion. The bill would also provide that funds received from the sale, exchange lease, or any combination thereof of the real property would be appropriated to the Department of General Services to expend for the purposes of the bill. The bill would require the director to initially offer the Pacific Highway Property for disposition to the City of San Diego for purposes of a local government-owned facility to be used for affordable housing, and under terms and conditions that provide for continuous operation of the state's facilities at the Pacific Highway Property until relocation is accomplished. The bill would authorize the director, if the City of San Diego is unable to enter into an agreement within 120 days after notice from the Department of General Services, to instead offer the property for disposition to the public through a competitive selection process determined by the director to be in the best interest of the state. The bill would require the Department of General Services to be reimbursed for any reasonable cost or expense incurred in the disposition of the Pacific Highway Property from the proceeds of the disposition. The bill would also require the Department of General Services to obtain approval from the Department of Finance prior to the execution of any disposition agreement regarding the Pacific Highway Property, and to notify the chairperson of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, the chairperson of the Assembly Committee on Appropriations, and the chairperson of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee in writing of the director's intention to enter into a lease or an agreement, as provided.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.

  3. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. Read second time and amended.

  4. Referred to Com. on A. & A.R.

  5. From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.

  6. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Gloria · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Gloria

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

housing transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 3090 do?
Existing law authorizes the Director of General Services to acquire and convey real property for the state, whenever that transfer of the real property is authorized or contemplated by law. This bill would authorize the director to sell, lease, exchange, or any combination thereof, all or a portion of the Pacific Highway Property, located at 4902 Pacific Highway in the City of San Diego, currently used by the Department of the California Highway Patrol as its San Diego area office, that is specifically declared not to be surplus to the needs of the state, and in return, to acquire land and facilities to provide a substitute location capable of accommodating its presently necessary and received future expansion. The bill would also provide that funds received from the sale, exchange lease, or any combination thereof of the real property would be appropriated to the Department of General Services to expend for the purposes of the bill. The bill would require the director to initially offer the Pacific Highway Property for disposition to the City of San Diego for purposes of a local government-owned facility to be used for affordable housing, and under terms and conditions that provide for continuous operation of the state's facilities at the Pacific Highway Property until relocation is accomplished. The bill would authorize the director, if the City of San Diego is unable to enter into an agreement within 120 days after notice from the Department of General Services, to instead offer the property for disposition to the public through a competitive selection process determined by the director to be in the best interest of the state. The bill would require the Department of General Services to be reimbursed for any reasonable cost or expense incurred in the disposition of the Pacific Highway Property from the proceeds of the disposition. The bill would also require the Department of General Services to obtain approval from the Department of Finance prior to the execution of any disposition agreement regarding the Pacific Highway Property, and to notify the chairperson of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, the chairperson of the Assembly Committee on Appropriations, and the chairperson of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee in writing of the director's intention to enter into a lease or an agreement, as provided.
Who sponsors AB 3090?
AB 3090 is sponsored by Gloria.
What is the current status of AB 3090?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 3090?
Track AB 3090 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 3090

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 3090

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →