Property tax: exemption: principal residence: disabled veterans and their unmarried surviving spouses.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 3209 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 3209.
You're tracking AB 3209
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 3209 — Property tax: exemption: principal residence: disabled veterans and their unmarried surviving spouses.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing property tax law, pursuant to the authorization of the California Constitution, provides a disabled veterans' property tax exemption for the principal place of residence of a veteran that is owned by the veteran, the veteran's spouse, or the veteran and veteran's spouse jointly, if the veteran is blind in both eyes, has lost the use of 2 or more limbs, or is totally disabled as a result of injury or disease incurred in military. Existing property tax law also exempts property that is owned by, and that constitutes the principal place of residence of, the unmarried surviving spouse of a veteran, as provided. Existing law exempts that part of the full value of the residence that does not exceed $100,000, or $150,000, depending on whether the household income of the veteran or the unmarried surviving spouse of a veteran exceeds $40,000, adjusted for inflation, as specified. This bill, beginning with the 2019–20 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, would instead exempt the full value of the principal place of residence of a veteran and the unmarried surviving spouse of a veteran. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/30/18 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 30, 2018
- Introduced 02/16/18 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2018
- AB3209 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on V.A.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on V.A. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 23).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on REV. & TAX. and V.A.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Frazier · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Frazier
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 3209 do?
- Existing property tax law, pursuant to the authorization of the California Constitution, provides a disabled veterans' property tax exemption for the principal place of residence of a veteran that is owned by the veteran, the veteran's spouse, or the veteran and veteran's spouse jointly, if the veteran is blind in both eyes, has lost the use of 2 or more limbs, or is totally disabled as a result of injury or disease incurred in military. Existing property tax law also exempts property that is owned by, and that constitutes the principal place of residence of, the unmarried surviving spouse of a veteran, as provided. Existing law exempts that part of the full value of the residence that does not exceed $100,000, or $150,000, depending on whether the household income of the veteran or the unmarried surviving spouse of a veteran exceeds $40,000, adjusted for inflation, as specified. This bill, beginning with the 2019–20 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, would instead exempt the full value of the principal place of residence of a veteran and the unmarried surviving spouse of a veteran. Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
- Who sponsors AB 3209?
- AB 3209 is sponsored by Frazier.
- What is the current status of AB 3209?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 3209?
- Track AB 3209 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 3209
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 3209
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →