California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 264 — High-occupancy toll lanes: Interstate 405 Improvement Project high-occupancy toll lanes.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law authorizes a regional transportation agency or the department to apply to the California Transportation Commission to develop and operate high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or other toll facilities. Existing law requires certain excess revenue generated by the toll facility to be used in the corridor from which the revenue was generated pursuant to an expenditure plan developed by the sponsoring agency, as provided. This bill would instead require net excess toll revenues, as defined, received from high-occupancy toll lanes on a specified portion of an approximately 16-mile-long project corridor in the County of Orange on Interstate 405 and that traverses the Cities of Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Westminster, and Seal Beach to be allocated to the Orange County Transportation Authority and certain project corridor jurisdictions according to a specified schedule. The bill would require these moneys to be spent on specified transportation improvement projects.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. April 25 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. Set for hearing April 25.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.

  5. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  6. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  7. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 11.

  8. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Nguyen · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Nguyen

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 264 do?
Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law authorizes a regional transportation agency or the department to apply to the California Transportation Commission to develop and operate high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or other toll facilities. Existing law requires certain excess revenue generated by the toll facility to be used in the corridor from which the revenue was generated pursuant to an expenditure plan developed by the sponsoring agency, as provided. This bill would instead require net excess toll revenues, as defined, received from high-occupancy toll lanes on a specified portion of an approximately 16-mile-long project corridor in the County of Orange on Interstate 405 and that traverses the Cities of Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Westminster, and Seal Beach to be allocated to the Orange County Transportation Authority and certain project corridor jurisdictions according to a specified schedule. The bill would require these moneys to be spent on specified transportation improvement projects.
Who sponsors SB 264?
SB 264 is sponsored by Nguyen.
What is the current status of SB 264?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 264?
Track SB 264 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 264

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 264

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →