California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 435 — Williamson Act: payments to local governments.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Williamson Act, also known as the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, authorizes a city or county to enter into contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation. Existing law sets forth procedures for reimbursing cities and counties for property tax revenues not received as a result of these contracts and continuously appropriates General Fund moneys for that purpose. Existing law requires the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to direct the Controller to make annual payments out of these moneys to an eligible city, county, or city and county for each acre of land that is within its regulatory jurisdiction and assessed under specified provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The amount of payment is $5 per acre of prime agricultural land and $1 per acre of all other land devoted to open-space uses of statewide significance, as defined, or, in counties which have adopted farmland security zones, as provided, $8 per acre of land that is within, or within 3 miles of the sphere of influence of, each incorporated city. This bill would reduce the amount per acre paid to a city, county, or city and county under these provisions to $2.50 for prime agricultural land, $0.50 for all other land devoted to open-space uses of statewide significance, and, for counties that have adopted farmland security zones, $4 for land that is within, or within 3 miles of the sphere of influence of, each incorporated city. This bill, commencing July 1, 2017, would require the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to direct the Controller to pay an additional subvention of funds to a county, city, or city and county that meets specified criteria upon determination by the Strategic Growth Council that the county, city, or city and county has adopted measures to protect and conserve resource lands and farmland that further the implementation of the applicable regional sustainable communities strategy, as provided. The bill would provide that the amount of the additional subventions would be $2.50 for prime agricultural land, $0.50 for all other land devoted to open-space uses of statewide significance, and $4 for land enrolled in a farmland security zone that is within, or within 3 miles of the sphere of influence of, each incorporated city. Existing law, for the 2008–09 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, requires the Controller to reduce the amount paid to a city, county, or city and county by 10%. This bill would delete that requirement. The bill would also require a county, city, or city and county, in order to be eligible to receive subvention payments from the Controller, to adopt procedures to accept new contract applications and to consider proposed rescission of contracts for parcels eligible for a solar-use easement pursuant to specified law. Existing law prohibits an increase or reduction in the amount paid to a city or county which was paid in the prior fiscal year, beginning with the 1977–78 fiscal year, as provided, in excess of an amount which is equal to the property tax derived from a levy at the rate of $0.03 per hundred dollars of assessed value for the fiscal year, except as affected by an increase or a reduction in the acreage assessed under specified provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code. This bill would repeal this prohibition. By increasing the amount of continuously appropriated general fund moneys authorized to be used for subvention payments, this bill would make an appropriation.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. May 25 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

  3. Set for hearing May 25.

  4. May 22 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  5. Set for hearing May 22.

  6. May 15 hearing postponed by committee.

  7. Set for hearing May 15.

  8. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  9. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 884.) (April 26).

  10. Set for hearing April 26.

  11. April 19 hearing postponed by committee.

  12. Set for hearing April 19.

  13. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  14. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 18.

  15. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Dodd · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Dodd

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation environment agriculture
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 435 do?
The Williamson Act, also known as the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, authorizes a city or county to enter into contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation. Existing law sets forth procedures for reimbursing cities and counties for property tax revenues not received as a result of these contracts and continuously appropriates General Fund moneys for that purpose. Existing law requires the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to direct the Controller to make annual payments out of these moneys to an eligible city, county, or city and county for each acre of land that is within its regulatory jurisdiction and assessed under specified provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The amount of payment is $5 per acre of prime agricultural land and $1 per acre of all other land devoted to open-space uses of statewide significance, as defined, or, in counties which have adopted farmland security zones, as provided, $8 per acre of land that is within, or within 3 miles of the sphere of influence of, each incorporated city. This bill would reduce the amount per acre paid to a city, county, or city and county under these provisions to $2.50 for prime agricultural land, $0.50 for all other land devoted to open-space uses of statewide significance, and, for counties that have adopted farmland security zones, $4 for land that is within, or within 3 miles of the sphere of influence of, each incorporated city. This bill, commencing July 1, 2017, would require the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to direct the Controller to pay an additional subvention of funds to a county, city, or city and county that meets specified criteria upon determination by the Strategic Growth Council that the county, city, or city and county has adopted measures to protect and conserve resource lands and farmland that further the implementation of the applicable regional sustainable communities strategy, as provided. The bill would provide that the amount of the additional subventions would be $2.50 for prime agricultural land, $0.50 for all other land devoted to open-space uses of statewide significance, and $4 for land enrolled in a farmland security zone that is within, or within 3 miles of the sphere of influence of, each incorporated city. Existing law, for the 2008–09 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, requires the Controller to reduce the amount paid to a city, county, or city and county by 10%. This bill would delete that requirement. The bill would also require a county, city, or city and county, in order to be eligible to receive subvention payments from the Controller, to adopt procedures to accept new contract applications and to consider proposed rescission of contracts for parcels eligible for a solar-use easement pursuant to specified law. Existing law prohibits an increase or reduction in the amount paid to a city or county which was paid in the prior fiscal year, beginning with the 1977–78 fiscal year, as provided, in excess of an amount which is equal to the property tax derived from a levy at the rate of $0.03 per hundred dollars of assessed value for the fiscal year, except as affected by an increase or a reduction in the acreage assessed under specified provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code. This bill would repeal this prohibition. By increasing the amount of continuously appropriated general fund moneys authorized to be used for subvention payments, this bill would make an appropriation.
Who sponsors SB 435?
SB 435 is sponsored by Dodd.
What is the current status of SB 435?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 435?
Track SB 435 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 435

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 435

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →