AB 975 — Natural resources: wild and scenic rivers.
Last action — Died on inactive file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes that it is the policy of the state that certain rivers that possess extraordinary scenic, recreational, fishery, or wildlife values shall be preserved in their free-flowing state, together with their immediate environments, for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of the state. This bill would revise that policy to specify that certain rivers that possess scenic, recreational, fishery, wildlife, historical, cultural, geological, or other similar values shall be preserved in their free-flowing state, together with their immediate environments, for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of the state, and would revise the definition of "immediate environments," and define the term "extraordinary value" for purposes of that policy.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/04/17 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 04, 2017
- Amended 03/23/17 - Amended Assembly pdf March 23, 2017
- Introduced 02/16/17 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2017
- AB975 View text html
Action History
-
Died on inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Friedman.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Ayes 47. Noes 21. Page 1374.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (April 5).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (March 20).
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Introduced measure version corrected.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Friedman · Primary
- Travis Allen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Friedman
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 15 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 12 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 47 | 21 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 26% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 975 do?
- Existing law establishes that it is the policy of the state that certain rivers that possess extraordinary scenic, recreational, fishery, or wildlife values shall be preserved in their free-flowing state, together with their immediate environments, for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of the state. This bill would revise that policy to specify that certain rivers that possess scenic, recreational, fishery, wildlife, historical, cultural, geological, or other similar values shall be preserved in their free-flowing state, together with their immediate environments, for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of the state, and would revise the definition of "immediate environments," and define the term "extraordinary value" for purposes of that policy.
- Who sponsors AB 975?
- AB 975 is sponsored by Friedman and Travis Allen.
- What is the current status of AB 975?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 975?
- Track AB 975 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 975
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 975
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →