AB 9 — Sales and use taxes: exemption: sanitary napkins: tampons: menstrual sponges and menstrual cups.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. Those laws provide various exemptions from those taxes. This bill, on and after January 1, 2018, would exempt from those taxes the gross receipts from the sale in this state of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, tampons, sanitary napkins, menstrual sponges, and menstrual cups. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing laws authorize districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which generally conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to the Sales and Use Tax Law are automatically incorporated into the local tax laws. Existing law requires the state to reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse any local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 12/05/16 - Introduced Current pdf December 05, 2016
- AB9 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (May 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee January 5.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Acosta · Cosponsor
- Anderson · Cosponsor
- Baker · Cosponsor
- Cooley · Cosponsor
- Cunningham · Cosponsor
- Eggman · Cosponsor
- Glazer · Cosponsor
- Gomez · Cosponsor
- Jones-Sawyer · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Maienschein · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Cosponsor
- O'Donnell · Cosponsor
- Steinorth · Cosponsor
- Voepel · Cosponsor
- Scott D. Wiener · Cosponsor
- Robert Garcia · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 104 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
Co-sponsors (17)
- Acosta
- Anderson
- Baker
- Cooley
- Cunningham
- Eggman
- Glazer
- Gomez
- Jones-Sawyer
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Maienschein
- Mathis
- McCarty
- O'Donnell
- Steinorth
- Voepel
- Wiener, Scott D. Democratic
Not signed on (104)
104 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 104 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 10% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Nay |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 9 do?
- Existing sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. Those laws provide various exemptions from those taxes. This bill, on and after January 1, 2018, would exempt from those taxes the gross receipts from the sale in this state of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, tampons, sanitary napkins, menstrual sponges, and menstrual cups. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing laws authorize districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which generally conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to the Sales and Use Tax Law are automatically incorporated into the local tax laws. Existing law requires the state to reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse any local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
- Who sponsors AB 9?
- AB 9 is sponsored by Acosta, Anderson, Baker, Cooley, Cunningham, Eggman, Glazer, Gomez, Jones-Sawyer, Lackey, Tom (Republican), Maienschein, Mathis, McCarty, O'Donnell, Steinorth, Voepel, Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic), and Garcia, Robert (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 9?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 9?
- Track AB 9 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 9
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 9
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →