California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 1679 — Motor vehicle insurance: auto body repair.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law makes certain business practices in insurance unlawful, including, but not limited to, an insurer requiring an auto body repair shop, as a condition of participation in the insurer's direct repair program, to pay for the cost of an insured's rental vehicle that is replacing an insured vehicle damaged in an accident, or to pay for the towing charges of the insured with respect to that accident. Existing law also requires any insurer that conducts an auto body repair labor rate survey to determine and set a specified prevailing auto body repair labor rate in a specific geographic area to report the results of that survey to the Department of Insurance, which is required to make the information available upon request. This bill would delete the above-described provisions regarding an auto body repair labor rate survey and instead would require an insurer that conducts or uses a survey that establishes a prevailing auto body repair labor rate in a specific geographic area to report the results of the survey to the department at least every 24 months and would require the survey results to contain specified information, including, among other things, the name and physical address of each auto body repair shop surveyed, the total number of auto body repair shops surveyed, and a description of the geographic area covered. The bill would authorize the department to have access to all labor rate survey responses, a list of surveyed auto repair shops, the method for selecting surveyed shops, and the information used by the insurer to determine the geographic area for the survey and would require the department to keep all that information confidential, as specified. The bill would provide that a survey that complies with specified standards and requirements be accorded the status of a rebuttable presumption by the commissioner that the insurer has attempted in good faith to effectuate a fair and equitable labor rate component of a claim settlement or an adjustment of the labor rate component of a written estimate provided by a claimant. Existing law prohibits insurers from requiring that an automobile be repaired at a specific automotive repair dealer, as defined. Under existing law, an insurer may suggest or recommend a specific automotive repair dealer under specified circumstances, including when a referral is expressly requested by the claimant. Existing law authorizes an insurer to provide a claimant with specific truthful and nondeceptive information regarding the services and benefits available to the claimant during the claims process. This bill would authorize an insurer to provide the claimant, at any time, with specific, truthful, and nondeceptive information including, among other things, a description of the insurer's direct repair program and information identifying available participating direct repair program repair shops and information about the types of parts that may be used in making the necessary repairs to the damaged motor vehicle. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Held under submission.

  4. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  5. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  6. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  7. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  8. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.

  9. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.

  11. Referred to Com. on INS.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Burke · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Burke

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety finance labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1679 do?
Existing law makes certain business practices in insurance unlawful, including, but not limited to, an insurer requiring an auto body repair shop, as a condition of participation in the insurer's direct repair program, to pay for the cost of an insured's rental vehicle that is replacing an insured vehicle damaged in an accident, or to pay for the towing charges of the insured with respect to that accident. Existing law also requires any insurer that conducts an auto body repair labor rate survey to determine and set a specified prevailing auto body repair labor rate in a specific geographic area to report the results of that survey to the Department of Insurance, which is required to make the information available upon request. This bill would delete the above-described provisions regarding an auto body repair labor rate survey and instead would require an insurer that conducts or uses a survey that establishes a prevailing auto body repair labor rate in a specific geographic area to report the results of the survey to the department at least every 24 months and would require the survey results to contain specified information, including, among other things, the name and physical address of each auto body repair shop surveyed, the total number of auto body repair shops surveyed, and a description of the geographic area covered. The bill would authorize the department to have access to all labor rate survey responses, a list of surveyed auto repair shops, the method for selecting surveyed shops, and the information used by the insurer to determine the geographic area for the survey and would require the department to keep all that information confidential, as specified. The bill would provide that a survey that complies with specified standards and requirements be accorded the status of a rebuttable presumption by the commissioner that the insurer has attempted in good faith to effectuate a fair and equitable labor rate component of a claim settlement or an adjustment of the labor rate component of a written estimate provided by a claimant. Existing law prohibits insurers from requiring that an automobile be repaired at a specific automotive repair dealer, as defined. Under existing law, an insurer may suggest or recommend a specific automotive repair dealer under specified circumstances, including when a referral is expressly requested by the claimant. Existing law authorizes an insurer to provide a claimant with specific truthful and nondeceptive information regarding the services and benefits available to the claimant during the claims process. This bill would authorize an insurer to provide the claimant, at any time, with specific, truthful, and nondeceptive information including, among other things, a description of the insurer's direct repair program and information identifying available participating direct repair program repair shops and information about the types of parts that may be used in making the necessary repairs to the damaged motor vehicle. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Who sponsors AB 1679?
AB 1679 is sponsored by Burke.
What is the current status of AB 1679?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1679?
Track AB 1679 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1679

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1679

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →