SB 586 — Assault and battery of a federal peace officer.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law makes assault committed against a peace officer, as defined, engaged in the performance of his or her duties when the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties punishable by a fine not exceeding $2,000, or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment. This bill would make assault committed against a federal peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, when the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a federal peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, punishable by the same penalties described above. Existing law makes battery committed against a peace officer, as defined, engaged in the performance of his or her duties, as specified, when the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, and an injury is inflicted on that peace officer, punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment in a county jail for 16 months, or 2 or 3 years, or by both the fine and imprisonment. This bill would make battery committed against a federal peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, when the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a federal peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, and an injury is inflicted on that federal peace officer, punishable by the same penalties described above. By enhancing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/17/17 - Introduced Current pdf February 17, 2017
- SB586 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
April 18 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 5. Page 748.)
-
Set for hearing April 18.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Vidak · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Vidak
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 586 do?
- Existing law makes assault committed against a peace officer, as defined, engaged in the performance of his or her duties when the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties punishable by a fine not exceeding $2,000, or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment. This bill would make assault committed against a federal peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, when the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a federal peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, punishable by the same penalties described above. Existing law makes battery committed against a peace officer, as defined, engaged in the performance of his or her duties, as specified, when the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, and an injury is inflicted on that peace officer, punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment in a county jail for 16 months, or 2 or 3 years, or by both the fine and imprisonment. This bill would make battery committed against a federal peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, when the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a federal peace officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties, and an injury is inflicted on that federal peace officer, punishable by the same penalties described above. By enhancing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 586?
- SB 586 is sponsored by Vidak.
- What is the current status of SB 586?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 586?
- Track SB 586 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 586
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 586
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →