California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 697 — Land use: development fees.

Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Mitigation Fee Act requires a local agency, in establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project, to identify the purpose of the fee and the use to which it is to be put. If the use is financing a public improvement, the improvement is required to be publicly identified, as well as the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year. This bill, if a local agency fails to comply with the requirements described above for a 2nd consecutive year, would prohibit a local agency from collecting established fees, and from imposing new fees, until compliance with the requirements described above have been met. The bill would prohibit a local agency from threatening or implementing a moratorium on construction because of these fee prohibitions and would require the local agency to continue to approve development projects without the collection or imposition of fees.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. May 3 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  3. Set for hearing May 3.

  4. April 19 hearing postponed by committee.

  5. Set for hearing April 19.

  6. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  7. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  8. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 697 do?
The Mitigation Fee Act requires a local agency, in establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project, to identify the purpose of the fee and the use to which it is to be put. If the use is financing a public improvement, the improvement is required to be publicly identified, as well as the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year. This bill, if a local agency fails to comply with the requirements described above for a 2nd consecutive year, would prohibit a local agency from collecting established fees, and from imposing new fees, until compliance with the requirements described above have been met. The bill would prohibit a local agency from threatening or implementing a moratorium on construction because of these fee prohibitions and would require the local agency to continue to approve development projects without the collection or imposition of fees.
Who sponsors SB 697?
SB 697 is sponsored by Mark Stone.
What is the current status of SB 697?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 697?
Track SB 697 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 697

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 697

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →