California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 1276 — Civil proceedings: expert testimony.

Last action — May 8 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes an expert witness to testify in the form of an opinion, as specified, and to state on direct examination the reasons for the opinion and the matter upon which it is based, unless the witness is precluded by law from using those reasons or matter as a basis for the opinion. The court, in its discretion, may require that a witness, before testifying in the form of an opinion, be first examined concerning the matter upon which the opinion is based. Existing law also provides circumstances under which testimony in the form of an opinion based in whole or in significant part on matter that is not a proper basis for an opinion may be excluded. The California Supreme Court, in People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal. 4th 665, held that statements made out of court and relied upon by an expert witness in forming the basis of the witness's opinion are inadmissible hearsay if an expert witness testifies to the content of those statements as true and accurate in support of the expert's opinion. This bill would abrogate the holding in that decision as it applies to proceedings under the Family Code by providing, in these proceedings, that evidence of a statement used to support the opinion of an expert is not inadmissible as hearsay if the court, in its discretion, determines that the statement is reliable, and would require the court to consider certain factors in making its determination. The bill would also authorize, in proceedings under the Family Code, that a witness, before testifying in the form of an opinion, be examined with regard to the factors considered by the court to determine the reliability of a statement. The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. May 8 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  3. Set for hearing May 8.

  4. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  5. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  6. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Moorlach · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Moorlach

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1276 do?
Existing law authorizes an expert witness to testify in the form of an opinion, as specified, and to state on direct examination the reasons for the opinion and the matter upon which it is based, unless the witness is precluded by law from using those reasons or matter as a basis for the opinion. The court, in its discretion, may require that a witness, before testifying in the form of an opinion, be first examined concerning the matter upon which the opinion is based. Existing law also provides circumstances under which testimony in the form of an opinion based in whole or in significant part on matter that is not a proper basis for an opinion may be excluded. The California Supreme Court, in People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal. 4th 665, held that statements made out of court and relied upon by an expert witness in forming the basis of the witness's opinion are inadmissible hearsay if an expert witness testifies to the content of those statements as true and accurate in support of the expert's opinion. This bill would abrogate the holding in that decision as it applies to proceedings under the Family Code by providing, in these proceedings, that evidence of a statement used to support the opinion of an expert is not inadmissible as hearsay if the court, in its discretion, determines that the statement is reliable, and would require the court to consider certain factors in making its determination. The bill would also authorize, in proceedings under the Family Code, that a witness, before testifying in the form of an opinion, be examined with regard to the factors considered by the court to determine the reliability of a statement. The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes.
Who sponsors SB 1276?
SB 1276 is sponsored by Moorlach.
What is the current status of SB 1276?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1276?
Track SB 1276 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1276

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1276

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →