California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 2706 — Juvenile wards: discharge.

Last action — Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law allows the Board of Juvenile Hearings to set a date on which a ward is to be discharged from the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice under the supervision of the probation department of, and the jurisdiction of the court of, the committing county, or to deny discharge and hold the person for a total period of time that does not exceed the maximum term of physical confinement set by the juvenile court. Existing law requires the division, not less than 60 days prior to the scheduled discharge consideration hearing of a ward, to provide to the probation department and the court of the committing county, and the ward's counsel, if known, the most recent written review, as specified. This bill would authorize the probation department of the committing county to participate in the ward's reentry case conference with the Division of Juvenile Justice, in person or by video conferencing. The bill would also make technical and conforming changes.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  2. Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5642.)

  3. Assembly Rule 69(b) suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 25. Page 5641.)

  4. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  5. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  6. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 25).

  7. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  8. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  9. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  11. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Jones-Sawyer · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Jones-Sawyer

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Do pass as amended.

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12001
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 16001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Chau — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Fong — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2706 do?
Existing law allows the Board of Juvenile Hearings to set a date on which a ward is to be discharged from the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice under the supervision of the probation department of, and the jurisdiction of the court of, the committing county, or to deny discharge and hold the person for a total period of time that does not exceed the maximum term of physical confinement set by the juvenile court. Existing law requires the division, not less than 60 days prior to the scheduled discharge consideration hearing of a ward, to provide to the probation department and the court of the committing county, and the ward's counsel, if known, the most recent written review, as specified. This bill would authorize the probation department of the committing county to participate in the ward's reentry case conference with the Division of Juvenile Justice, in person or by video conferencing. The bill would also make technical and conforming changes.
Who sponsors AB 2706?
AB 2706 is sponsored by Jones-Sawyer.
What is the current status of AB 2706?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2706?
Track AB 2706 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2706

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2706

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →