Juveniles: dependency.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2344 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2344.
You're tracking AB 2344
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2344 — Juveniles: dependency.
Last action — Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge certain children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child is abused, a parent or guardian fails to adequately supervise or protect the child, as specified, or a parent or guardian fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law requires an order changing or modifying a previous order by removing a child from the physical custody of a parent, guardian, relative, or friend, and directing placement in a foster home, or commitment to a private or county institution, to be made only after noticed hearing upon the filing of a supplemental petition. This bill would require the court, for a child who has been removed from the physical custody of a relative or friend as described above, to develop a process by which the child may be returned to the physical custody of the relative or friend and by which qualifying foster care payments may be continued, only if the court makes a finding that the home is suitable for the child's return. To the extent that the bill would create new duties for the social worker in determining the suitability of the home and would create new duties for counties relating to foster care payments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/15/18 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 15, 2018
- Introduced 02/13/18 - Introduced pdf February 13, 2018
- AB2344 View text html
Action History
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Thurmond · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Thurmond
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2344 do?
- Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge certain children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child is abused, a parent or guardian fails to adequately supervise or protect the child, as specified, or a parent or guardian fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law requires an order changing or modifying a previous order by removing a child from the physical custody of a parent, guardian, relative, or friend, and directing placement in a foster home, or commitment to a private or county institution, to be made only after noticed hearing upon the filing of a supplemental petition. This bill would require the court, for a child who has been removed from the physical custody of a relative or friend as described above, to develop a process by which the child may be returned to the physical custody of the relative or friend and by which qualifying foster care payments may be continued, only if the court makes a finding that the home is suitable for the child's return. To the extent that the bill would create new duties for the social worker in determining the suitability of the home and would create new duties for counties relating to foster care payments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2344?
- AB 2344 is sponsored by Thurmond.
- What is the current status of AB 2344?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2344?
- Track AB 2344 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2344
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2344
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →