Animal slaughter: poultry.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 3159 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 3159.
You're tracking AB 3159
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 3159 — Animal slaughter: poultry.
Last action — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law specifies the method by which designated animals are required to be slaughtered by any person engaged in the business of slaughtering those animals or by any person when all, or any part, of that animal is subsequently sold or used for commercial purposes. Existing law permits a method of slaughter that requires the animal to be rendered insensible to pain by specified means before being cut, shackled, hoisted, or cast, with the exception of poultry, which may be shackled. Under existing law, a violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit, when this method of slaughter is used, poultry from being shackled before being rendered insensible to pain by those specified means. Because a violation of this prohibition would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/23/18 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 23, 2018
- Introduced 02/16/18 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2018
- AB3159 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Thurmond · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Thurmond
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 20% | 70% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Nay |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 3159 do?
- Existing law specifies the method by which designated animals are required to be slaughtered by any person engaged in the business of slaughtering those animals or by any person when all, or any part, of that animal is subsequently sold or used for commercial purposes. Existing law permits a method of slaughter that requires the animal to be rendered insensible to pain by specified means before being cut, shackled, hoisted, or cast, with the exception of poultry, which may be shackled. Under existing law, a violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit, when this method of slaughter is used, poultry from being shackled before being rendered insensible to pain by those specified means. Because a violation of this prohibition would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 3159?
- AB 3159 is sponsored by Thurmond.
- What is the current status of AB 3159?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 3159?
- Track AB 3159 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 3159
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 3159
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →