California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

AB 745 — Commissioners: criminal proceedings in the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes a presiding judge of a court to direct a commissioner to perform duties and exercise authority relating to certain criminal proceedings, including, among others, conducting arraignment proceedings and issuing and signing bench warrants. This bill would, until January 1, 2021, expand the authority of a presiding judge of a superior court located within the County of Riverside or the County of San Bernardino, if certain conditions are met, to direct a commissioner to perform specified duties and exercise authority in criminal proceedings. The bill would require the Judicial Council to report to the Governor and Legislature on this expanded authority, as specified. The bill also makes legislative findings and declarations in support of its provisions. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the superior courts located within the County of Riverside and the County of San Bernardino.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Held under submission.

  4. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. Read second time and amended.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 27).

  8. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1173.)

  9. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  11. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  12. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  13. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 745 do?
Existing law authorizes a presiding judge of a court to direct a commissioner to perform duties and exercise authority relating to certain criminal proceedings, including, among others, conducting arraignment proceedings and issuing and signing bench warrants. This bill would, until January 1, 2021, expand the authority of a presiding judge of a superior court located within the County of Riverside or the County of San Bernardino, if certain conditions are met, to direct a commissioner to perform specified duties and exercise authority in criminal proceedings. The bill would require the Judicial Council to report to the Governor and Legislature on this expanded authority, as specified. The bill also makes legislative findings and declarations in support of its provisions. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the superior courts located within the County of Riverside and the County of San Bernardino.
Who sponsors AB 745?
AB 745 is sponsored by Reyes, Eloise Gómez (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 745?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 745?
Track AB 745 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 745

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 745

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →