AB 3186 — Public postsecondary education: University of California: California Community Colleges: competitive bidding: best value.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 725, Statutes of 2018.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law establishes the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, and the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community College, as 2 of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law establishes community college districts, administered by governing boards, throughout the state, to provide instruction to students. Existing law requires the Regents of the University of California, except as provided, to let all contracts involving an expenditure of more than $100,000 annually for goods and materials or services to the lowest responsible bidder meeting certain specifications, or to reject all bids. Existing law requires the governing board of any community college district to let specified contracts involving an expenditure of more than $50,000 to the lowest responsible bidder meeting certain specifications, or else reject all bids. Existing law, until January 1, 2019, provides that the bid evaluation and selection for these contracts may be determined by the best value for the University of California or the community college district, as specified. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions relating to the University of California a crime. Existing law provides for the University of California and the California Community Colleges to report to the Legislative Analyst regarding the use of best value procurement, and requires the Legislative Analyst to report to the Legislature in this regard by February 1, 2018. This bill would delete the January 1, 2019, repeal date applicable to best value procurement authority, thereby extending operation of these provisions indefinitely and would delete the references to the reports described above regarding use of best value procurement by the University of California and community college districts. By extending these provisions relating to the University of California indefinitely, the bill would expand an existing crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/23/18 - Chaptered Current pdf September 23, 2018
- Enrolled 08/29/18 - Enrolled pdf August 29, 2018
- Introduced 02/16/18 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2018
- AB3186 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 725, Statutes of 2018.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 10. Page 5807.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 21. Page 5510.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (May 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Medina · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Medina
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 25% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Delgado | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 17 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 27% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 18% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 3186 do?
- Existing law establishes the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, and the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community College, as 2 of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law establishes community college districts, administered by governing boards, throughout the state, to provide instruction to students. Existing law requires the Regents of the University of California, except as provided, to let all contracts involving an expenditure of more than $100,000 annually for goods and materials or services to the lowest responsible bidder meeting certain specifications, or to reject all bids. Existing law requires the governing board of any community college district to let specified contracts involving an expenditure of more than $50,000 to the lowest responsible bidder meeting certain specifications, or else reject all bids. Existing law, until January 1, 2019, provides that the bid evaluation and selection for these contracts may be determined by the best value for the University of California or the community college district, as specified. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions relating to the University of California a crime. Existing law provides for the University of California and the California Community Colleges to report to the Legislative Analyst regarding the use of best value procurement, and requires the Legislative Analyst to report to the Legislature in this regard by February 1, 2018. This bill would delete the January 1, 2019, repeal date applicable to best value procurement authority, thereby extending operation of these provisions indefinitely and would delete the references to the reports described above regarding use of best value procurement by the University of California and community college districts. By extending these provisions relating to the University of California indefinitely, the bill would expand an existing crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 3186?
- AB 3186 is sponsored by Medina.
- What is the current status of AB 3186?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 3186?
- Track AB 3186 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 3186
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 3186
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →