Nonvehicular air pollution: criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 617 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 617.
You're tracking AB 617
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 617 — Nonvehicular air pollution: criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 136, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
23 sponsors
1 primary, 22 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to make available on its Internet Web site data concerning the emissions of greenhouse gases, criteria air pollutants, and toxic air contaminants, as specified. This bill would require the state board to develop a uniform statewide system of annual reporting of emissions of criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants for use by certain categories of stationary sources. The bill would require those stationary sources to report their annual emissions of criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants, as specified. (2) Existing law generally designates air pollution control and air quality management districts with the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law authorizes the state board or an air district to require the owner or the operator of an air pollution emission source to take any action that the state board or the air district determines to be reasonable for the determination of the amount of air pollution emissions from that source. This bill would require the state board, by October 1, 2018, to prepare a monitoring plan regarding technologies for monitoring criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants and the need for and benefits of additional community air monitoring systems, as defined. The bill would require the state board to select, based on the monitoring plan, the highest priority locations in the state for the deployment of community air monitoring systems. The bill would require an air district containing a selected location, by July 1, 2019, to deploy a system in the selected location. The bill would authorize the air district to require a stationary source that emits air pollutants in, or that materially affect, the selected location to deploy a fence-line monitoring system, as defined, or other specified real-time, on-site monitoring. The bill would authorize the state board, by January 1, 2020, and annually thereafter, to select additional locations for the deployment of the systems. The bill would require air districts that have deployed a system to provide to the state board air quality data produced by the system. By increasing the duties of air districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the state board to publish the data on its Internet Web site. This bill would require the state board, by October 1, 2018, to prepare and update, at least once every 5 years, a statewide strategy to reduce emissions of toxic air contaminants and criteria pollutants in communities affected by a high cumulative exposure burden. The bill would require the state board to select locations around the state for the preparation of community emissions reduction programs, and to provide grants to community-based organizations for technical assistance and to support community participation in the programs. The bill would require an air district containing a selected location, within one year of the state board's selection, to adopt a community emissions reduction program. By increasing the duties of air districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law requires air districts, prior to adopting rules to meet the requirement for best available retrofit control technology or for a specified feasible measure, to take specified actions, including, among others, identifying one or more potential control options that achieve the emissions reduction objectives for the rule. Existing law also authorizes a district to establish its own best available retrofit control technology requirement based upon the consideration of specified factors. This bill would require a district that is in nonattainment for one or more air pollutants to adopt an expedited schedule for the implementation of best available retrofit control technology, as specified. The bill would require the schedule to apply to each industrial source that, as of January 1, 2017, was subject to a specified market-based compliance mechanism and give highest priority to those permitted units that have not modified emissions-related permit conditions for the greatest period of time. This bill would require the state board to establish and maintain a statewide clearinghouse that identifies the best available control technology, best available retrofit control technology for criteria air pollutants, and related technologies for the control of toxic air contaminants. (4) Existing law establishes maximum criminal and civil penalties for any person, as defined, for violations of air pollution laws from nonvehicular sources. Existing law generally establishes the maximum criminal and civil penalties at $1,000, unless otherwise specified. This bill would increase the maximum for the generally applicable criminal and civil penalties under these provisions to $5,000. The bill would annually adjust maximum penalties for violations of these laws based on the California Consumer Price Index. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/26/17 - Chaptered Current pdf July 26, 2017
- Enrolled 07/17/17 - Enrolled pdf July 17, 2017
- Amended 07/14/17 - Amended Senate pdf July 14, 2017
- Amended 07/10/17 - Amended Senate pdf July 10, 2017
- Amended 04/18/17 - Amended Assembly pdf April 18, 2017
- Introduced 02/14/17 - Introduced pdf February 14, 2017
- AB617 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 136, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:45 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 50. Noes 24. Page 2589.).
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 50. Noes 19. Page 2585.)
-
Assembly Rule 77(a) suspended.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 19 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 13. Page 2068.).
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 17).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) suspended. (Ayes 27. Noes 11. Page 2012.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 0. Page 1621.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 10).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Robert Garcia · Cosponsor
- Robert Garcia · Primary
- Bocanegra · Cosponsor
- Gonzalez Fletcher · Cosponsor
- Atkins · Cosponsor
- De León · Cosponsor
- Bloom · Cosponsor
- Chu · Cosponsor
- Friedman · Cosponsor
- Mike A. Gipson · Cosponsor
- Hill · Cosponsor
- Holden · Cosponsor
- Hertzberg · Cosponsor
- Jones-Sawyer · Cosponsor
- Lara · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Cosponsor
- Al Muratsuchi · Cosponsor
- Nazarian · Cosponsor
- Quirk · Cosponsor
- Eloise Gómez Reyes · Cosponsor
- Santiago · Cosponsor
- Skinner · Cosponsor
- Weber · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 22 co-sponsors · 99 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
Co-sponsors (22)
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
- Bocanegra
- Gonzalez Fletcher
- Atkins
- De León
- Bloom
- Chu
- Friedman
- Gipson, Mike A. Democratic
- Hill
- Holden
- Hertzberg
- Jones-Sawyer
- Lara
- McCarty
- Muratsuchi, Al Democratic
- Nazarian
- Quirk
- Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic
- Santiago
- Skinner
- Weber
Not signed on (99)
99 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 99 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 17 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 12 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 50 | 24 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 30% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 69 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Gloria | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 617 do?
- (1) Existing law requires the State Air Resources Board to make available on its Internet Web site data concerning the emissions of greenhouse gases, criteria air pollutants, and toxic air contaminants, as specified. This bill would require the state board to develop a uniform statewide system of annual reporting of emissions of criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants for use by certain categories of stationary sources. The bill would require those stationary sources to report their annual emissions of criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants, as specified. (2) Existing law generally designates air pollution control and air quality management districts with the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law authorizes the state board or an air district to require the owner or the operator of an air pollution emission source to take any action that the state board or the air district determines to be reasonable for the determination of the amount of air pollution emissions from that source. This bill would require the state board, by October 1, 2018, to prepare a monitoring plan regarding technologies for monitoring criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants and the need for and benefits of additional community air monitoring systems, as defined. The bill would require the state board to select, based on the monitoring plan, the highest priority locations in the state for the deployment of community air monitoring systems. The bill would require an air district containing a selected location, by July 1, 2019, to deploy a system in the selected location. The bill would authorize the air district to require a stationary source that emits air pollutants in, or that materially affect, the selected location to deploy a fence-line monitoring system, as defined, or other specified real-time, on-site monitoring. The bill would authorize the state board, by January 1, 2020, and annually thereafter, to select additional locations for the deployment of the systems. The bill would require air districts that have deployed a system to provide to the state board air quality data produced by the system. By increasing the duties of air districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the state board to publish the data on its Internet Web site. This bill would require the state board, by October 1, 2018, to prepare and update, at least once every 5 years, a statewide strategy to reduce emissions of toxic air contaminants and criteria pollutants in communities affected by a high cumulative exposure burden. The bill would require the state board to select locations around the state for the preparation of community emissions reduction programs, and to provide grants to community-based organizations for technical assistance and to support community participation in the programs. The bill would require an air district containing a selected location, within one year of the state board's selection, to adopt a community emissions reduction program. By increasing the duties of air districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law requires air districts, prior to adopting rules to meet the requirement for best available retrofit control technology or for a specified feasible measure, to take specified actions, including, among others, identifying one or more potential control options that achieve the emissions reduction objectives for the rule. Existing law also authorizes a district to establish its own best available retrofit control technology requirement based upon the consideration of specified factors. This bill would require a district that is in nonattainment for one or more air pollutants to adopt an expedited schedule for the implementation of best available retrofit control technology, as specified. The bill would require the schedule to apply to each industrial source that, as of January 1, 2017, was subject to a specified market-based compliance mechanism and give highest priority to those permitted units that have not modified emissions-related permit conditions for the greatest period of time. This bill would require the state board to establish and maintain a statewide clearinghouse that identifies the best available control technology, best available retrofit control technology for criteria air pollutants, and related technologies for the control of toxic air contaminants. (4) Existing law establishes maximum criminal and civil penalties for any person, as defined, for violations of air pollution laws from nonvehicular sources. Existing law generally establishes the maximum criminal and civil penalties at $1,000, unless otherwise specified. This bill would increase the maximum for the generally applicable criminal and civil penalties under these provisions to $5,000. The bill would annually adjust maximum penalties for violations of these laws based on the California Consumer Price Index. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 617?
- AB 617 is sponsored by Garcia, Robert (Democratic), Bocanegra, Gonzalez Fletcher, Atkins, De León, Bloom, Chu, Friedman, Gipson, Mike A. (Democratic), Hill, Holden, Hertzberg, Jones-Sawyer, Lara, McCarty, Muratsuchi, Al (Democratic), Nazarian, Quirk, Reyes, Eloise Gómez (Democratic), Santiago, Skinner, and Weber.
- What is the current status of AB 617?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 617?
- Track AB 617 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 617
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 617
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →