California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 552 — United Water Conservation District.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 294, Statutes of 2017.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the Water Conservation District Law of 1931, authorizes a water conservation district to be organized and established by a county board of supervisors, with specified powers and purposes. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District to inspect any water-producing facility within its boundaries with the consent of the operator of the water-producing facility or with a duly issued inspection warrant, as prescribed. Because the willful refusal of an inspection lawfully authorized by an inspection warrant is a misdemeanor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the application of a crime. (2) The law permits a water conservation district to levy groundwater charges and requires a district to cause to be made annually an engineering investigation and report on groundwater conditions of the district. The law requires the district board to hold a hearing on the report and then authorizes the board to make a determination to levy a groundwater charge. The law requires, when a water-producing facility in a zone with a groundwater charge is permanently abandoned, that the operator of the facility give written notice of the abandonment to the district. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District to affix seals to an abandoned water-producing facility. (3) The law requires a district, if any operator of a water-producing facility fails to pay the groundwater charge when due, to charge interest at the rate of 1% each month on the delinquent amount. The law requires a district, if any operator of a water-producing facility fails to register the facility or fails to file required water production statements, to additionally assess a penalty charge against the operator in an amount of 10% of the amount due. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District to assess an administrative charge to recover the cost of collection of delinquent unpaid charges and would authorize the district to adopt an ordinance to provide that in excusable or justifiable circumstances, the administrative charge may be reduced or waived. (4) The law authorizes a district to bring a suit against any operator, as defined, of a water-producing facility within the district for the collection of any delinquent groundwater charge. The law authorizes a court, in addition to allowing recovery of costs to the district, to fix and allow as part of the judgment interest and penalties, as specified. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District to seek a writ of attachment against the property of any named defendant in an above-described suit, as specified. This bill would authorize the district to recover administrative charges in these suits brought against an operator. This bill would authorize, as an alternative to bringing a suit, the district to collect any delinquent groundwater charge and any interest, penalties, costs, and administrative charges in the same manner as delinquent assessments, water charges, or tolls. The bill would authorize as an additional remedy, after specified notice and a public hearing, the district to order an operator to cease extraction of groundwater from a water-producing facility until all delinquent fees and charges are paid. (5) The law authorizes a court in a suit by a district against an operator of a water-producing facility within the district for the collection of any delinquent groundwater charge to issue and grant an injunction restraining and prohibiting the defendant from the operation of any water-producing facility when it is established at the hearing that the defendant has failed to register the facility with the district or that the defendant is delinquent in payment of groundwater charges for the facility. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District, following the issuance of the injunction, as a condition of allowing future operation of the water-producing facility, to require the operator to post a cash deposit or bond with the district, as prescribed. (6) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the United Water Conservation District. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 294, Statutes of 2017.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 16. Page 2921.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 2332.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  9. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 11).

  11. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  12. Withdrawn from committee.

  13. Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and JUD.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 15. Page 1538.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (May 10).

  18. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  20. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  23. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 60 Yea · 16 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 431302
Democratic 15000
Republican 2301
Total 601603
% of votes cast 76%20%0%4%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Not Voting
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Holden — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Harper — Nay
Burke — Yea
Gray — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Low — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Fong — Nay
Mayes — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Jim Patterson — Nay
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 28 Yea · 10 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 241001
Democratic 4001
Total 281002
% of votes cast 70%25%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Newman — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Glazer — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Allen — Yea
De León — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bates — Nay
Monning — Not Voting
Moorlach — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Not Voting
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 59 Yea · 15 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 43905
Democratic 15100
Republican 1501
Total 591506
% of votes cast 74%19%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Not Voting
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Levine — Yea
Medina — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Eggman — Not Voting
Cooper — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Harper — Nay
Burke — Yea
Gray — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Low — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Mayes — Not Voting
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Holden — Not Voting
Kiley — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 13 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9200
Democratic 4100
Republican 0001
Total 13301
% of votes cast 76%18%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Eggman — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gray — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chau — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Nay
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 3002
Republican 1000
Total 7002
% of votes cast 78%0%0%22%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Voepel — Not Voting
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 552 do?
(1) Existing law, the Water Conservation District Law of 1931, authorizes a water conservation district to be organized and established by a county board of supervisors, with specified powers and purposes. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District to inspect any water-producing facility within its boundaries with the consent of the operator of the water-producing facility or with a duly issued inspection warrant, as prescribed. Because the willful refusal of an inspection lawfully authorized by an inspection warrant is a misdemeanor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the application of a crime. (2) The law permits a water conservation district to levy groundwater charges and requires a district to cause to be made annually an engineering investigation and report on groundwater conditions of the district. The law requires the district board to hold a hearing on the report and then authorizes the board to make a determination to levy a groundwater charge. The law requires, when a water-producing facility in a zone with a groundwater charge is permanently abandoned, that the operator of the facility give written notice of the abandonment to the district. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District to affix seals to an abandoned water-producing facility. (3) The law requires a district, if any operator of a water-producing facility fails to pay the groundwater charge when due, to charge interest at the rate of 1% each month on the delinquent amount. The law requires a district, if any operator of a water-producing facility fails to register the facility or fails to file required water production statements, to additionally assess a penalty charge against the operator in an amount of 10% of the amount due. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District to assess an administrative charge to recover the cost of collection of delinquent unpaid charges and would authorize the district to adopt an ordinance to provide that in excusable or justifiable circumstances, the administrative charge may be reduced or waived. (4) The law authorizes a district to bring a suit against any operator, as defined, of a water-producing facility within the district for the collection of any delinquent groundwater charge. The law authorizes a court, in addition to allowing recovery of costs to the district, to fix and allow as part of the judgment interest and penalties, as specified. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District to seek a writ of attachment against the property of any named defendant in an above-described suit, as specified. This bill would authorize the district to recover administrative charges in these suits brought against an operator. This bill would authorize, as an alternative to bringing a suit, the district to collect any delinquent groundwater charge and any interest, penalties, costs, and administrative charges in the same manner as delinquent assessments, water charges, or tolls. The bill would authorize as an additional remedy, after specified notice and a public hearing, the district to order an operator to cease extraction of groundwater from a water-producing facility until all delinquent fees and charges are paid. (5) The law authorizes a court in a suit by a district against an operator of a water-producing facility within the district for the collection of any delinquent groundwater charge to issue and grant an injunction restraining and prohibiting the defendant from the operation of any water-producing facility when it is established at the hearing that the defendant has failed to register the facility with the district or that the defendant is delinquent in payment of groundwater charges for the facility. This bill would authorize the United Water Conservation District, following the issuance of the injunction, as a condition of allowing future operation of the water-producing facility, to require the operator to post a cash deposit or bond with the district, as prescribed. (6) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the United Water Conservation District. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 552?
AB 552 is sponsored by Irwin, Jacqui (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 552?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 14, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 552?
Track AB 552 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 552

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 552

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →