Enhanced infrastructure financing districts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1568 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1568.
You're tracking AB 1568
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1568 — Enhanced infrastructure financing districts.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 562, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law establishes procedures for the formation of infrastructure financing districts, enhanced infrastructure financing districts, infrastructure and revitalization financing districts, and community revitalization and investment authorities, as specified, to undertake various economic development projects, including financing public facilities and infrastructure, affordable housing, and economic revitalization. Existing law authorizes an infrastructure financing plan or a community revitalization and investment plan to provide for the division of taxes levied upon taxable property, if any, between the affected taxing entities, as defined, and the district or authority. This bill would enact the Neighborhood Infill Finance and Transit Improvements Act, which would authorize a city, county, or city and county to adopt a resolution, at any time before or after the adoption of the infrastructure refinancing plan, to allocate specified tax revenues to the district under specified circumstances. This bill would require the legislative body of a city or county establishing an enhanced infrastructure financing district that will allocate those revenues, as described, to adopt an ordinance to establish the procedure by which the city or county will calculate the amount of revenues that will be dedicated to the proposed district.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/07/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 07, 2017
- Enrolled 09/19/17 - Enrolled pdf September 19, 2017
- Amended 09/08/17 - Amended Senate pdf September 08, 2017
- Amended 07/19/17 - Amended Senate pdf July 19, 2017
- Amended 05/26/17 - Amended Assembly pdf May 26, 2017
- Amended 05/16/17 - Amended Assembly pdf May 16, 2017
- Amended 05/01/17 - Amended Assembly pdf May 01, 2017
- Amended 03/28/17 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2017
- Introduced 02/17/17 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2017
- AB1568 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 562, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 3457.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 11. Page 2849.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (July 18).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on T. & H. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 12). Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 23. Page 2061.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 26).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (May 10).
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bloom · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bloom
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 41 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 54 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 30% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 23% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 17 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 53 | 23 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 29% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1568 do?
- Existing law establishes procedures for the formation of infrastructure financing districts, enhanced infrastructure financing districts, infrastructure and revitalization financing districts, and community revitalization and investment authorities, as specified, to undertake various economic development projects, including financing public facilities and infrastructure, affordable housing, and economic revitalization. Existing law authorizes an infrastructure financing plan or a community revitalization and investment plan to provide for the division of taxes levied upon taxable property, if any, between the affected taxing entities, as defined, and the district or authority. This bill would enact the Neighborhood Infill Finance and Transit Improvements Act, which would authorize a city, county, or city and county to adopt a resolution, at any time before or after the adoption of the infrastructure refinancing plan, to allocate specified tax revenues to the district under specified circumstances. This bill would require the legislative body of a city or county establishing an enhanced infrastructure financing district that will allocate those revenues, as described, to adopt an ordinance to establish the procedure by which the city or county will calculate the amount of revenues that will be dedicated to the proposed district.
- Who sponsors AB 1568?
- AB 1568 is sponsored by Bloom.
- What is the current status of AB 1568?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1568?
- Track AB 1568 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1568
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1568
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →