AB 2012 — School and community college employees: parental leave.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 994, Statutes of 2018.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes, during each school year, a person employed by a school district in a position requiring certification qualifications, and a person employed in an academic position by a community college district, to use his or her sick leave for purposes of parental leave for a period of up to 12 workweeks. Existing law requires, when a person employed in a position requiring certification qualifications in school districts that use a certain differential pay system or a person employed in an academic position in community college districts that use a certain differential pay system has exhausted all available sick leave and continues to be absent from his or her duties on account of parental leave, the amount deducted from the salary due to the employee for any of the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period in which the absence occurs to not exceed the sum that is actually paid, or that would have been paid, to a substitute employee or temporary employee employed to fill his or her position during his or her absence. Existing law additionally requires, when a person employed in a position requiring certification qualifications in school districts that use a certain other differential pay system or a person employed in an academic position in community college districts that use a certain other differential pay system has exhausted all available sick leave and continues to be absent from his or her duties on account of parental leave, that the person is compensated at no less than 50% of his or her regular salary for the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period of parental leave. This bill would instead require, regardless of the type of differential pay system used by the school district or community college district, a person employed in a position requiring certification qualifications and a person employed in an academic position to receive no less than 50% of his or her regular salary for the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period of parental leave. (2) Existing law authorizes, during each school year, a classified employee of a school district or community college district to use his or her sick leave for purposes of parental leave for a period of up to 12 workweeks. Existing law requires, when a classified employee of school districts and community college districts that use a certain differential pay system has exhausted all available sick leave and continues to be absent from his or her duties on account of parental leave, the amount deducted from the salary due to the classified employee for any of the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period in which the absence occurs to not exceed the sum that is actually paid to a substitute employee employed to fill his or her position during his or her absence. Existing law additionally requires, when a classified employee of school districts and community college districts that use a certain other differential pay system has exhausted all available sick leave and continues to be absent from his or her duties on account of parental leave, that the employee is compensated at no less than 50% of the employee's regular salary for the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period of parental leave. This bill would instead require, regardless of the type of differential pay system used by the school district or community college district, a classified employee to receive no less than 50% of his or her regular salary for the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period of parental leave.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/18 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2018
- Enrolled 08/31/18 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2018
- Amended 08/22/18 - Amended Senate pdf August 22, 2018
- Introduced 02/01/18 - Introduced pdf February 01, 2018
- AB2012 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 994, Statutes of 2018.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 23. Page 6835.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 5792.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Coms. on ED. and APPR.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 20. Page 5209.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (May 9).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jesse Gabriel · Cosponsor
- Medina · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Medina
Co-sponsors (1)
- Gabriel, Jesse Democratic
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 41 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 23% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Delgado | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 15 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 51 | 20 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 26% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 23% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2012 do?
- (1) Existing law authorizes, during each school year, a person employed by a school district in a position requiring certification qualifications, and a person employed in an academic position by a community college district, to use his or her sick leave for purposes of parental leave for a period of up to 12 workweeks. Existing law requires, when a person employed in a position requiring certification qualifications in school districts that use a certain differential pay system or a person employed in an academic position in community college districts that use a certain differential pay system has exhausted all available sick leave and continues to be absent from his or her duties on account of parental leave, the amount deducted from the salary due to the employee for any of the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period in which the absence occurs to not exceed the sum that is actually paid, or that would have been paid, to a substitute employee or temporary employee employed to fill his or her position during his or her absence. Existing law additionally requires, when a person employed in a position requiring certification qualifications in school districts that use a certain other differential pay system or a person employed in an academic position in community college districts that use a certain other differential pay system has exhausted all available sick leave and continues to be absent from his or her duties on account of parental leave, that the person is compensated at no less than 50% of his or her regular salary for the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period of parental leave. This bill would instead require, regardless of the type of differential pay system used by the school district or community college district, a person employed in a position requiring certification qualifications and a person employed in an academic position to receive no less than 50% of his or her regular salary for the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period of parental leave. (2) Existing law authorizes, during each school year, a classified employee of a school district or community college district to use his or her sick leave for purposes of parental leave for a period of up to 12 workweeks. Existing law requires, when a classified employee of school districts and community college districts that use a certain differential pay system has exhausted all available sick leave and continues to be absent from his or her duties on account of parental leave, the amount deducted from the salary due to the classified employee for any of the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period in which the absence occurs to not exceed the sum that is actually paid to a substitute employee employed to fill his or her position during his or her absence. Existing law additionally requires, when a classified employee of school districts and community college districts that use a certain other differential pay system has exhausted all available sick leave and continues to be absent from his or her duties on account of parental leave, that the employee is compensated at no less than 50% of the employee's regular salary for the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period of parental leave. This bill would instead require, regardless of the type of differential pay system used by the school district or community college district, a classified employee to receive no less than 50% of his or her regular salary for the remaining portion of the 12-workweek period of parental leave.
- Who sponsors AB 2012?
- AB 2012 is sponsored by Gabriel, Jesse (Democratic) and Medina.
- What is the current status of AB 2012?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2012?
- Track AB 2012 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2012
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2012
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →