California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1696 — Insurance omnibus: developmental services.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 417, Statutes of 2017.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law divides insurance into various classes, including long-term care insurance, which includes an insurance policy, certificate, or rider advertised, marketed, offered, solicited, or designed to provide coverage for diagnostic, preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitative, maintenance, or personal care services that are provided in a setting other than an acute care unit of a hospital. Existing law, for the purposes of long-term care insurance, defines "alternate plan of care" as a plan of care developed by a licensed health care practitioner that includes a specification of long-term care services required by an insured that are not specifically defined as a covered service under the policy, and specifies that an insurer is not required to include a provision in a long-term care insurance policy that authorizes an alternate plan of care. This bill, among other things, would clarify that an insurer and an insured may agree to use an alternate plan of care even if there is no provision in the long-term care insurance policy that specifically authorizes one, that neither an insurer nor an insured is obligated to negotiate an alternate plan of care, and that if an insurer does not accept an extra-contractual request for an alternate plan of care, the rejection is not a denial of a claim. Existing law requires the Insurance Commissioner to conduct an examination of the business and affairs of insurers admitted in this state at least once every 5 years. This bill would require an admitted insurer to maintain all records necessary to determine the financial condition of the insurer for the current year plus the 5 previous years. Existing law provides the means by which an insurer may redomesticate its principal place of business to this state or redomesticate to any other state in which it is admitted to transact the business of insurance. Existing law defines "redomestication" as the transfer of an insurer's place of incorporation from another state to this state or from this state to another state. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to file the certificate of redomestication of an insurer for which articles of incorporation have previously been filed if the commissioner has approved the redomestication. This bill would delete the above-described requirement that the Secretary of State file the certificate of redomestication, would require an insurer redomesticating to this state to file articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State, as prescribed, and would require an insurer redomesticating to another state to file a statement of redomestication with the Secretary of State, as prescribed. Existing law requires a property broker-agent and a casualty broker-agent to, prior to acting in the capacity of an insurance broker, file and continuously maintain in force the required bond. This bill would also require a personal lines broker-agent to comply with these requirements and would require that the bond be filed with the commissioner. Existing law prohibits a person who has failed any Department of Insurance license qualification examination 10 times within the previous 12-month period from enrolling in any further license qualification examinations for a period of 12 months. This bill would delete the above-described prohibition and would instead prohibit a person from being admitted to more than 10 license qualification examinations of the same type in any 12-month period, as specified. The bill would also specify the types of license qualification examinations covered by these provisions. Existing law provides requirements for specified licensees to include certain information on business cards, written price quotations, and print advertisements distributed in this state for insurance products. This bill, commencing January 1, 2019, would exempt, among others, insurance adjusters from these requirements, would add personal lines licensees and limited lines automobile insurance agents to the list of licensees to whom these requirements apply, and would modify the required information, as specified. Existing law provides that the information obtained in the administration of the Unemployment Insurance Law is for the exclusive use and information of the Director of Employment Development in the discharge of his or her duties and is not open to the public. However, existing law requires the director to permit the use of specified information for specified purposes, and allows the director to require reimbursement for direct costs incurred. Existing law provides that a person who knowingly accesses, uses, or discloses this confidential information without authorization is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law establishes the Employment First Policy, which is the policy that opportunities for integrated, competitive employment be given the highest priority for working-age individuals with developmental disabilities, regardless of the severity of their disabilities. This bill would require the Director of Employment Development to provide any peace officer with the Enforcement Branch of the Department of Insurance with specified information that relates to specific insurance fraud investigations, as provided. The bill would also require the Director of Employment Development to disclose specified information to the State Department of Developmental Services to assist the State Department of Developmental Services in the implementation of the Employment First Policy. By providing this information to the Department of Insurance and the State Department of Developmental Services, this bill would expand the crime related to the unauthorized disclosure of this information, and would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law provides that all information and records obtained by the State Department of Developmental Services in the course of providing intake, assessment, and services to persons with developmental disabilities are confidential and may only be disclosed under specified circumstances. This bill would authorize the disclosure to authorized employees of the Employment Development Department of information and records obtained in the course of providing intake, assessment, and services to persons with developmental disabilities as necessary to enable the Employment Development Department to provide specific information to the State Department of Developmental Services for purposes of the Employment First Policy. This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes, delete obsolete provisions, and correct cross-references. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1095 of the Unemployment Insurance Code proposed by AB 1275 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1275 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 417, Statutes of 2017.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3323.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77(a) suspended. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 3255.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2771.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From Consent Calendar.

  12. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  13. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  14. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

  15. Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.

  16. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 12).

  17. Referred to Com. on I., B. & F.I.

  18. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  19. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1483.)

  20. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  21. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 3).

  22. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1059.)

  23. Re-referred to Com. on INS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.

  24. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  25. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 29).

  26. Re-referred to Com. on INS.

  27. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.

  28. Referred to Com. on INS.

  29. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  30. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Insurance · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Insurance

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35000
Democratic 5000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Newman — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Allen — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bates — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 57001
Democratic 15000
Republican 6000
Total 78001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Brough — Yea
Harper — Not Voting
Holden — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Salas — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Burke — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gray — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10003
Total 10003
% of votes cast 77%0%0%23%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Morrell — Yea
Newman — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Portantino — Not Voting
Hueso — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Roth — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 56001
Democratic 16000
Republican 5002
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Holden — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Harper — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Salas — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wood — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Burke — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
McCarty — Yea
O'Donnell — Not Voting
Rendon — Yea
Ting — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Chu — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8001
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Not Voting
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1696 do?
Existing law divides insurance into various classes, including long-term care insurance, which includes an insurance policy, certificate, or rider advertised, marketed, offered, solicited, or designed to provide coverage for diagnostic, preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitative, maintenance, or personal care services that are provided in a setting other than an acute care unit of a hospital. Existing law, for the purposes of long-term care insurance, defines "alternate plan of care" as a plan of care developed by a licensed health care practitioner that includes a specification of long-term care services required by an insured that are not specifically defined as a covered service under the policy, and specifies that an insurer is not required to include a provision in a long-term care insurance policy that authorizes an alternate plan of care. This bill, among other things, would clarify that an insurer and an insured may agree to use an alternate plan of care even if there is no provision in the long-term care insurance policy that specifically authorizes one, that neither an insurer nor an insured is obligated to negotiate an alternate plan of care, and that if an insurer does not accept an extra-contractual request for an alternate plan of care, the rejection is not a denial of a claim. Existing law requires the Insurance Commissioner to conduct an examination of the business and affairs of insurers admitted in this state at least once every 5 years. This bill would require an admitted insurer to maintain all records necessary to determine the financial condition of the insurer for the current year plus the 5 previous years. Existing law provides the means by which an insurer may redomesticate its principal place of business to this state or redomesticate to any other state in which it is admitted to transact the business of insurance. Existing law defines "redomestication" as the transfer of an insurer's place of incorporation from another state to this state or from this state to another state. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to file the certificate of redomestication of an insurer for which articles of incorporation have previously been filed if the commissioner has approved the redomestication. This bill would delete the above-described requirement that the Secretary of State file the certificate of redomestication, would require an insurer redomesticating to this state to file articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State, as prescribed, and would require an insurer redomesticating to another state to file a statement of redomestication with the Secretary of State, as prescribed. Existing law requires a property broker-agent and a casualty broker-agent to, prior to acting in the capacity of an insurance broker, file and continuously maintain in force the required bond. This bill would also require a personal lines broker-agent to comply with these requirements and would require that the bond be filed with the commissioner. Existing law prohibits a person who has failed any Department of Insurance license qualification examination 10 times within the previous 12-month period from enrolling in any further license qualification examinations for a period of 12 months. This bill would delete the above-described prohibition and would instead prohibit a person from being admitted to more than 10 license qualification examinations of the same type in any 12-month period, as specified. The bill would also specify the types of license qualification examinations covered by these provisions. Existing law provides requirements for specified licensees to include certain information on business cards, written price quotations, and print advertisements distributed in this state for insurance products. This bill, commencing January 1, 2019, would exempt, among others, insurance adjusters from these requirements, would add personal lines licensees and limited lines automobile insurance agents to the list of licensees to whom these requirements apply, and would modify the required information, as specified. Existing law provides that the information obtained in the administration of the Unemployment Insurance Law is for the exclusive use and information of the Director of Employment Development in the discharge of his or her duties and is not open to the public. However, existing law requires the director to permit the use of specified information for specified purposes, and allows the director to require reimbursement for direct costs incurred. Existing law provides that a person who knowingly accesses, uses, or discloses this confidential information without authorization is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law establishes the Employment First Policy, which is the policy that opportunities for integrated, competitive employment be given the highest priority for working-age individuals with developmental disabilities, regardless of the severity of their disabilities. This bill would require the Director of Employment Development to provide any peace officer with the Enforcement Branch of the Department of Insurance with specified information that relates to specific insurance fraud investigations, as provided. The bill would also require the Director of Employment Development to disclose specified information to the State Department of Developmental Services to assist the State Department of Developmental Services in the implementation of the Employment First Policy. By providing this information to the Department of Insurance and the State Department of Developmental Services, this bill would expand the crime related to the unauthorized disclosure of this information, and would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law provides that all information and records obtained by the State Department of Developmental Services in the course of providing intake, assessment, and services to persons with developmental disabilities are confidential and may only be disclosed under specified circumstances. This bill would authorize the disclosure to authorized employees of the Employment Development Department of information and records obtained in the course of providing intake, assessment, and services to persons with developmental disabilities as necessary to enable the Employment Development Department to provide specific information to the State Department of Developmental Services for purposes of the Employment First Policy. This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes, delete obsolete provisions, and correct cross-references. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1095 of the Unemployment Insurance Code proposed by AB 1275 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1275 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 1696?
AB 1696 is sponsored by Committee on Insurance.
What is the current status of AB 1696?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1696?
Track AB 1696 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1696

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1696

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →