Cleaning Product Right to Know Act of 2017.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 258 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 258.
You're tracking SB 258
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 258 — Cleaning Product Right to Know Act of 2017.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 830, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law regulates the existence of, and disclosure of, specified chemicals and components in consumer products, including phthalates and bisphenol A. This bill would require a manufacturer of a designated product, as defined, that is sold in the state to disclose on the product label and on the product's Internet Web site information related to chemicals contained in the designated product, as specified. The bill would authorize a manufacturer to protect certain chemicals from disclosure by use of a generic name, as specified. The bill would prohibit the sale in the state of a designated product that does not satisfy these requirements. Existing law, the Hazardous Substances Information and Training Act, ensures the transmission of necessary information to employees regarding the properties and potential hazards of hazardous substances in the workplace. A serious and knowing or negligent violation of the act by an employer and every officer, management official, or supervisor having direction, management, control, or custody of any employment, place of employment, or of any other employee is a crime. Existing law requires the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to adopt a standard setting forth an employer's duties toward its employees consistent with specified guidelines, including, among other things, that the employer shall make safety data sheets on substances in the workplace available to employees, collective bargaining representatives, or employee physicians. This bill would require an employer that is required to make a safety data sheet readily accessible to an employee pursuant to that standard to make readily accessible in the same manner, for designated products in the workplace, certain information included in the online disclosures described above relating to chemicals contained in those products. Because a violation of this requirement would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide that its provisions are severable. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/15/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 15, 2017
- Enrolled 09/15/17 - Enrolled pdf September 15, 2017
- Amended 08/23/17 - Amended Assembly pdf August 23, 2017
- Amended 07/13/17 - Amended Assembly pdf July 13, 2017
- Amended 07/06/17 - Amended Assembly pdf July 06, 2017
- Amended 06/27/17 - Amended Assembly pdf June 27, 2017
- Amended 03/20/17 - Amended Senate pdf March 20, 2017
- Introduced 02/08/17 - Introduced pdf February 08, 2017
- SB258 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 830, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 13. Page 2839.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 55. Noes 15. Page 3225.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (August 30).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 11).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on L. & E. and E.S. & T.M. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and L. & E.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 1280.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1180.) (May 25).
-
Set for hearing May 25.
-
May 15 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 15.
-
May 8 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing May 8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 854.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & I.R. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 536.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
Set for hearing March 29.
-
Referred to Coms. on EQ. and L. & I.R.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 11.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Lara · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Lara
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 42 | 11 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 55 | 15 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 19% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Acosta | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 24% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 0% | 0% | 43% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harper | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 258 do?
- Existing law regulates the existence of, and disclosure of, specified chemicals and components in consumer products, including phthalates and bisphenol A. This bill would require a manufacturer of a designated product, as defined, that is sold in the state to disclose on the product label and on the product's Internet Web site information related to chemicals contained in the designated product, as specified. The bill would authorize a manufacturer to protect certain chemicals from disclosure by use of a generic name, as specified. The bill would prohibit the sale in the state of a designated product that does not satisfy these requirements. Existing law, the Hazardous Substances Information and Training Act, ensures the transmission of necessary information to employees regarding the properties and potential hazards of hazardous substances in the workplace. A serious and knowing or negligent violation of the act by an employer and every officer, management official, or supervisor having direction, management, control, or custody of any employment, place of employment, or of any other employee is a crime. Existing law requires the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to adopt a standard setting forth an employer's duties toward its employees consistent with specified guidelines, including, among other things, that the employer shall make safety data sheets on substances in the workplace available to employees, collective bargaining representatives, or employee physicians. This bill would require an employer that is required to make a safety data sheet readily accessible to an employee pursuant to that standard to make readily accessible in the same manner, for designated products in the workplace, certain information included in the online disclosures described above relating to chemicals contained in those products. Because a violation of this requirement would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide that its provisions are severable. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 258?
- SB 258 is sponsored by Lara.
- What is the current status of SB 258?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 258?
- Track SB 258 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 258
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 258
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →