AB 3207 — California Financing Law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the California Financing Law (CFL) , provides for the licensure and regulation of finance lenders and brokers, and, beginning on January 1, 2019, program administrators, by the Commissioner of Business Oversight. The CFL prohibits anyone from engaging in the business of a finance lender or broker without obtaining a license. A willful violation of the CFL is a crime, except as specified. The CFL defines a broker to include anyone who is engaged in the business of negotiating or performing any act as a broker in connection with loans made by a finance lender. This bill would revise the definition of a broker to include anyone who, among other things, transmits confidential data about a prospective borrower to a finance lender with the expectation of compensation in connection with making a referral unless a specified exception applies, makes a referral under an agreement with a finance lender that meets certain requirements with the expectation of compensation if the finance lender enters into the loan with the prospective borrower unless a specified exception applies, participates in any loan negotiation between a finance lender and prospective borrower, participates in the preparation of loan documents, communicates lending decisions or inquiries to a borrower, or charges a fee to a prospective borrower for any services related to an application for a loan from a finance lender. The bill would exempt specified persons from the definition of broker, including the operator of an Internet search engine or social media platform. Because the bill would expand the definition of an existing crime by broadening the definition of a broker for purposes of the CFL, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would prohibit a licensed broker from performing an act that falls within the definition of a broker without first obtaining the borrower's express consent. (2) Existing law exempts specified entities from the CFL. Under existing federal law, a federally recognized Indian tribe is immune from suit on the basis of tribal sovereign immunity, and the California Supreme Court held in People ex rel. Owen v. Miami Nation Enterprises (2016) 2 Cal.5th 222 that tribal sovereign immunity can extend to an entity that is acting as an arm of the tribe provided the entity meets 5 factors articulated in that case. The bill would state that the provisions of the CFL should not be interpreted to impose licensing or regulatory obligations on federally recognized Indian tribes or business entities that are considered "arms of the tribe", under the test articulated in the California Supreme Court case described above and any superseding case law. The bill would clarify that a licensed broker is not prohibited from performing any act that falls within the definition of broker in connection with loans made by a person not required to be licensed as a finance lender under this division. (3) Existing law prohibits a finance lender, broker, or mortgage loan originator licensee from paying any commission, fee, or other compensation to an unlicensed individual for conducting activities related to a consumer loan that require a license, unless that unlicensed individual is exempt from licensure. Existing law authorizes a licensed finance lender to compensate an unlicensed person in connection with the referral of one or more prospective borrowers to the licensee for a commercial loan if certain requirements are met. This bill would prohibit a finance lender from compensating a person for any of the acts that fall within the definition of a broker, as described above, unless that person is a licensed broker, is not required to be licensed as a broker under the CFL, or if that compensation is made in connection with the referral of one or more prospective borrowers when specified conditions are met. The bill would prohibit an unlicensed person who receives compensation pursuant to that exception from collecting a prospective borrower's confidential data for the purpose of making a referral without first obtaining the borrower's express consent, and would also require that person to provide a written disclosure to the prospective borrower before making the referral that shows the method of compensation to the licensed broker. The bill would prohibit a licensed finance lender from compensating a broker for specified acts that fall within the definition of broker if the finance lender has actual knowledge at the time the compensation is to be made that the broker has committed any violation of the CFL or any rule or order adopted under the CFL in connection with that loan. The bill would prohibit a licensed finance lender who enters into a loan with a prospective borrower in which the finance lender paid or would pay a referral fee from passing through an additional fee attributable to the referral fee, but would authorize a licensed finance lender to charge additional fees or costs attributable to the performance of other acts that fall within the definition of a broker if the finance lender pays another person for performing any of those acts for a consumer loan made under the CFL. The bill would require a licensed broker who compensates unlicensed persons for referrals as described above to develop, implement, and enforce policies and procedures to ensure that the unlicensed person does not engage in acts that would have been a violation of the CFL had those acts been committed by a licensee. The bill would provide that a licensed broker who is in violation of this provision is in violation of this chapter to the same extent as the unlicensed person would have been had that person been a licensed broker. The bill would provide, however, that a licensed broker is not in violation of these provisions solely for the reason that an unlicensed person that the broker compensated commits isolated acts that are in violation of the CFL. The bill would require a broker who compensates unlicensed persons for referrals to maintain books and records documenting the identities of all unlicensed persons that the broker compensates for referrals and all unlicensed persons that broker severs a relationship with due to the unlicensed persons' failure to adhere to the broker's policies and procedures adopted pursuant to these provisions. By expanding the scope of an existing crime with respect to violations of the CFL, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law requires a licensed finance lender to provide a borrower with respect to a consumer loan a statement that contains, among other things, the terms of the loan, and to obtain a signed statement from the borrower as to whether any person has performed any act as a broker in connection with the making of the loan. The bill would make clarifying changes to that provision, and would require a licensed finance lender, in lieu of the requirement to obtain a signed statement from the borrower described above, making a consumer loan to a prospective borrower who was referred by a licensed broker as described above or before the prospective borrower is obligated on the loan, to provide to the prospective borrower a statement that provides specified information relating to the arrangement in a clear and conspicuous manner. (5) Existing law requires a licensed broker to comply with certain duties with respect to a consumer loan, including delivering the borrower a signed statement that contains the terms of the agreement with the broker, and when the borrower pays the loan in full, ensure that the finance lender fully complies with a provision of the CFL that requires a licensed finance lender, upon repayment of any loan in full, to take specified actions related to that loan, including releasing all security for the loan and marking it as paid. This bill would, with respect to acts that fall within the definition of broker other than transmitting confidential data and making a referral as described above, no longer require a licensed broker to ensure that a finance lender fully complies with the provision of the CFL governing repayment described above. The bill would require a licensed broker before making a referral in connection with a consumer loan to provide to the prospective borrower a statement that provides specified information relating to the arrangement in a clear and conspicuous manner and to then obtain the prospective borrower's express consent. (6) The CFL authorizes the commissioner to examine specified records of every person engaged in the business of a finance lender, broker, or, beginning on January 1, 2019, program administrator, for the purpose of discovering violations of the CFL or securing information otherwise required in the administration and enforcement of this division. This bill would require the commissioner to examine the affairs of each finance lender licensee for compliance at least once every 48 months. The bill would authorize the commissioner to conduct the examination under oath. By expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the commissioner to provide a written statement of the findings of the examination, to issue a copy of that statement to the licensee's principals, officers, or directors, and to take appropriate steps to ensure correction of any violations. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

• Amended 07/05/18 - Amended Senate Current pdf July 05, 2018
• Amended 06/18/18 - Amended Senate pdf June 18, 2018
• Amended 05/29/18 - Amended Assembly pdf May 29, 2018
• Amended 05/10/18 - Amended Assembly pdf May 10, 2018
• Amended 04/04/18 - Amended Assembly pdf April 04, 2018
• Amended 03/22/18 - Amended Assembly pdf March 22, 2018
• Introduced 02/16/18 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2018
• AB3207 View text html

Action History

1. August 16, 2018

   In committee: Held under submission.

2. August 06, 2018

   In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

3. July 05, 2018

   Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

4. July 03, 2018

   From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 27).

5. June 18, 2018

   From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.

6. June 14, 2018

   In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

7. June 13, 2018

   Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.

8. June 04, 2018

   In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

9. May 31, 2018

   Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 26. Page 5630.)

10. May 29, 2018

    Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5363.)

11. May 25, 2018

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

12. May 25, 2018

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 25).

13. May 16, 2018

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

14. May 14, 2018

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

15. May 10, 2018

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

16. April 24, 2018

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

17. April 18, 2018

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

18. April 05, 2018

    Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

19. April 04, 2018

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.

20. April 02, 2018

    Re-referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and B. & F. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

21. April 02, 2018

    Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

22. March 22, 2018

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.

23. March 22, 2018

    Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and P. & C.P.

24. February 17, 2018

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.

25. February 16, 2018

    Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

• Monique Limón · Primary

Votes

Subjects