California Environmental Quality Act: notices.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 80 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 80.
You're tracking SB 80
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 80 — California Environmental Quality Act: notices.
Last action — Last day to consider Governor’s veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. The act requires the lead agency to mail certain notices to persons who have filed a written request for notices. The act provides that if the agency offers to provide the notices by email, upon filing a written request for notices, a person may request that the notices be provided to him or her by email. This bill would require the lead agency to post those notices on the agency's Internet Web site. The bill would require the agency to offer to provide those notices by email. Because this bill would increase the level of service provided by a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) CEQA requires that certain notices regarding an environmental impact report be posted for a period of 30 days in the office of the county clerk of each county in which the project will be located. CEQA specifies that notices regarding a negative declaration be posted for a period of 20 days unless otherwise specified. This bill would require the county clerk to post the notices regarding an environmental impact report or a negative declaration on the county's Internet Web site. Because the bill would require a county clerk to post those notices on the county's Internet Web site, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) CEQA exempts certain projects from its requirements. CEQA also requires the Office of Planning and Research to develop guidelines for the implementation of CEQA to exempt classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment. If a lead agency determines that the project is not subject to the requirements of CEQA and the agency approves or determines to carry out the project, CEQA authorizes the lead agency or certain persons to file a notice of the determination, as specified. This bill would require the filing of the notice if the lead agency determines that a project falls within a class of projects that is exempted from the requirements of CEQA by the guidelines. Because the bill would increase the duties of a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/13/17 - Enrolled Current pdf September 13, 2017
- Amended 06/21/17 - Amended Assembly pdf June 21, 2017
- Amended 02/14/17 - Amended Senate pdf February 14, 2017
- Introduced 01/11/17 - Introduced pdf January 11, 2017
- SB80 View text html
Action History
-
Last day to consider Governor’s veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 7. Page 2689.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 57. Noes 18. Page 3033.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (July 19).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 19).
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 7. Page 800.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 708.) (April 17).
-
Set for hearing April 17.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 536.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing March 29.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
Referred to Com. on EQ.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 11.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wieckowski · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wieckowski
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 7 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 18% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 41 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 57 | 18 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 23% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Not Voting |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 18% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 0% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 18% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Not Voting |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Not Voting |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 80 do?
- (1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. The act requires the lead agency to mail certain notices to persons who have filed a written request for notices. The act provides that if the agency offers to provide the notices by email, upon filing a written request for notices, a person may request that the notices be provided to him or her by email. This bill would require the lead agency to post those notices on the agency's Internet Web site. The bill would require the agency to offer to provide those notices by email. Because this bill would increase the level of service provided by a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) CEQA requires that certain notices regarding an environmental impact report be posted for a period of 30 days in the office of the county clerk of each county in which the project will be located. CEQA specifies that notices regarding a negative declaration be posted for a period of 20 days unless otherwise specified. This bill would require the county clerk to post the notices regarding an environmental impact report or a negative declaration on the county's Internet Web site. Because the bill would require a county clerk to post those notices on the county's Internet Web site, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) CEQA exempts certain projects from its requirements. CEQA also requires the Office of Planning and Research to develop guidelines for the implementation of CEQA to exempt classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment. If a lead agency determines that the project is not subject to the requirements of CEQA and the agency approves or determines to carry out the project, CEQA authorizes the lead agency or certain persons to file a notice of the determination, as specified. This bill would require the filing of the notice if the lead agency determines that a project falls within a class of projects that is exempted from the requirements of CEQA by the guidelines. Because the bill would increase the duties of a local agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 80?
- SB 80 is sponsored by Wieckowski.
- What is the current status of SB 80?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 80?
- Track SB 80 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 80
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 80
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →