Public nuisance: abatement: lead-based paint.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2073 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2073.
You're tracking AB 2073
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2073 — Public nuisance: abatement: lead-based paint.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Stern.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law defines a nuisance as one that affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal, and provides that a public nuisance may be remedied by an indictment or information, a civil action, or abatement. This bill would make any property owner, or agent thereof, who participates in a program to abate lead-based paint created as a result of a judgment or settlement in any public nuisance or similar litigation immune from liability in any lawsuit seeking to recover inspection, abatement, or any other costs associated with that abatement program and the activities conducted pursuant to that abatement program.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/22/18 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 22, 2018
- Introduced 02/07/18 - Introduced pdf February 07, 2018
- AB2073 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Stern.
-
From Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 20).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on EQ. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and EQ.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 5039.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 1).
-
Coauthors revised.
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bloom · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Primary
- Gloria · Cosponsor
- Jones-Sawyer · Cosponsor
- Mia Bonta · Cosponsor
- Ash Kalra · Cosponsor
- Kamlager-Dove · Cosponsor
- Monique Limón · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Cosponsor
- Mullin · Cosponsor
- Quirk · Cosponsor
- Ting · Cosponsor
- Scott D. Wiener · Cosponsor
- Juan Carrillo · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Chiu
Co-sponsors (14)
- Bloom
- Gloria
- Jones-Sawyer
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
- Kalra, Ash Democratic
- Kamlager-Dove
- Limón, Monique Democratic
- McCarty
- Mullin
- Quirk
- Ting
- Wiener, Scott D. Democratic
- Carrillo, Juan Democratic
- Mark Stone
Not signed on (107)
107 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 107 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 74 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2073 do?
- Existing law defines a nuisance as one that affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal, and provides that a public nuisance may be remedied by an indictment or information, a civil action, or abatement. This bill would make any property owner, or agent thereof, who participates in a program to abate lead-based paint created as a result of a judgment or settlement in any public nuisance or similar litigation immune from liability in any lawsuit seeking to recover inspection, abatement, or any other costs associated with that abatement program and the activities conducted pursuant to that abatement program.
- Who sponsors AB 2073?
- AB 2073 is sponsored by Bloom, Chiu, Gloria, Jones-Sawyer, Bonta, Mia (Democratic), Kalra, Ash (Democratic), Kamlager-Dove, Limón, Monique (Democratic), McCarty, Mullin, Quirk, Ting, Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic), Carrillo, Juan (Democratic), and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of AB 2073?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2073?
- Track AB 2073 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2073
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2073
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →