SB 165 — Highways: surplus nonresidential property.
Last action — August 23 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation to acquire real property for state highway purposes and specifies various procedures to be followed by the department when it determines that real property acquired for state highway purposes is no longer necessary for those purposes. Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to preserve, upgrade, and expand the supply of current housing to persons or families of low or moderate income through the sale of specified surplus residential property. Existing law requires an agency of the state disposing of surplus residential property to do so in accordance with specified priorities and procedures, including that priority to purchase be given to tenants that are former owners or are persons or families of low or moderate income. Existing law requires tenants in good standing who legally occupy nonresidential properties to be given priority to purchase the property at fair market value. Existing law, until January 1, 2020, prohibits the Department of Transportation from increasing the rent of tenants who reside in surplus residential property located within the State Route 710 corridor in the County of Los Angeles and who participate in the Affordable Rent Program administered by the department. This bill would, until January 1, 2022, also prohibit the Department of Transportation from increasing the rent of a tenant that legally occupies a surplus nonresidential property located within the State Route 710 corridor in the County of Los Angeles and that is a nonprofit organization.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/20/18 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 20, 2018
- Introduced 01/19/17 - Introduced pdf January 19, 2017
- SB165 View text html
Action History
-
August 23 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Calderon.
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Calderon.
-
From consent calendar on motion of Assembly Member Calderon.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 19).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 643.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Set for hearing April 3.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 362.) (March 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing March 14.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 19.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Portantino · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Portantino
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 0% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 165 do?
- Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation to acquire real property for state highway purposes and specifies various procedures to be followed by the department when it determines that real property acquired for state highway purposes is no longer necessary for those purposes. Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to preserve, upgrade, and expand the supply of current housing to persons or families of low or moderate income through the sale of specified surplus residential property. Existing law requires an agency of the state disposing of surplus residential property to do so in accordance with specified priorities and procedures, including that priority to purchase be given to tenants that are former owners or are persons or families of low or moderate income. Existing law requires tenants in good standing who legally occupy nonresidential properties to be given priority to purchase the property at fair market value. Existing law, until January 1, 2020, prohibits the Department of Transportation from increasing the rent of tenants who reside in surplus residential property located within the State Route 710 corridor in the County of Los Angeles and who participate in the Affordable Rent Program administered by the department. This bill would, until January 1, 2022, also prohibit the Department of Transportation from increasing the rent of a tenant that legally occupies a surplus nonresidential property located within the State Route 710 corridor in the County of Los Angeles and that is a nonprofit organization.
- Who sponsors SB 165?
- SB 165 is sponsored by Portantino.
- What is the current status of SB 165?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 165?
- Track SB 165 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 165
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 165
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →