California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 D cosponsors

AB 2872 — In-home supportive services: peer-to-peer training.

Last action — Vetoed by Governor.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services program to provide supportive services to aged, blind, or disabled persons, as defined, who are unable to perform the services themselves and who cannot safely remain in their homes or abodes of their own choosing unless these services are provided. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to perform certain administrative duties in connection with the program. Existing law authorizes a county board of supervisors to contract with a nonprofit consortium, or to establish a public authority, to provide in-home supportive services and requires those entities to perform specified functions, including providing training to providers and recipients. This bill would require the department, on or before July 1, 2019, and in consultation with employee representative organizations, to adopt a process to compensate providers of in-home supportive services for conducting peer-to-peer training. The bill would require the subject areas of the training to include how to enroll as a new provider in the In-Home Supportive Services program and how to navigate the program, as specified. The bill would require a provider conducting peer-to-peer training to be compensated at the county's prevailing wage rate for providing in-home supportive services. The bill would require the department to ensure that peer-to-peer hours are reimbursed to the employee representative organization for disbursement to the provider, no later than the 15th day of the following month. The bill would make attendance at the peer-to-peer training voluntary and would not require compensation to attendees. By imposing new duties on counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor.

  2. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  3. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 64. Noes 15. Page 6857.).

  4. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 9. Page 5766.).

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  8. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).

  9. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  10. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  13. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 12. Page 5538.)

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  16. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (May 25).

  17. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  18. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  20. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.

  21. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  22. From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 2872 CARRILLO Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 64 Yea · 15 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 461200
Democratic 16000
Republican 2301
Total 641501
% of votes cast 80%19%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Waldron — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Holden — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Salas — Yea
Burke — Yea
Gray — Yea
Harper — Nay
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Fong — Nay
Levine — Yea
Mayes — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Baker — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wood — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB2872 Carrillo By Leyva

Passed 28 Yea · 9 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 23903
Democratic 5000
Total 28903
% of votes cast 70%23%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Chang — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
De León — Yea
Glazer — Not Voting
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Allen — Not Voting
Delgado — Yea
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 2872 CARRILLO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 63 Yea · 12 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 46902
Democratic 15000
Republican 2301
Total 631203
% of votes cast 81%15%0%4%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Harper — Nay
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Daly — Yea
Burke — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Salas — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gray — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Nay
Chávez — Not Voting
Cooley — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Mayes — Not Voting
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Ting — Yea
Voepel — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10102
Democratic 3000
Republican 0100
Total 13202
% of votes cast 76%12%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Not Voting
Eggman — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Chau — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2872 do?
Existing law establishes the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services program to provide supportive services to aged, blind, or disabled persons, as defined, who are unable to perform the services themselves and who cannot safely remain in their homes or abodes of their own choosing unless these services are provided. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to perform certain administrative duties in connection with the program. Existing law authorizes a county board of supervisors to contract with a nonprofit consortium, or to establish a public authority, to provide in-home supportive services and requires those entities to perform specified functions, including providing training to providers and recipients. This bill would require the department, on or before July 1, 2019, and in consultation with employee representative organizations, to adopt a process to compensate providers of in-home supportive services for conducting peer-to-peer training. The bill would require the subject areas of the training to include how to enroll as a new provider in the In-Home Supportive Services program and how to navigate the program, as specified. The bill would require a provider conducting peer-to-peer training to be compensated at the county's prevailing wage rate for providing in-home supportive services. The bill would require the department to ensure that peer-to-peer hours are reimbursed to the employee representative organization for disbursement to the provider, no later than the 15th day of the following month. The bill would make attendance at the peer-to-peer training voluntary and would not require compensation to attendees. By imposing new duties on counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors AB 2872?
AB 2872 is sponsored by Carrillo, Juan (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2872?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2872?
Track AB 2872 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2872

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2872

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →