Elections: state and local reapportionment.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1018 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1018.
You're tracking SB 1018
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1018 — Elections: state and local reapportionment.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 462, Statutes of 2018.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a local jurisdiction, defined as a county or general law city, to establish by resolution or ordinance a commission composed of residents of the local jurisdiction to either change the boundaries of the districts of the local jurisdiction's legislative body or recommend to the governing body changes to the boundaries of the districts. Existing law defines a "legislative body" for these purposes to mean either a city council of a general law city or a county board of supervisors. For a commission that recommends changes to district boundaries, defined as an advisory redistricting commission, existing law prohibits a person who is an elected official of the local jurisdiction or a family member, staff member, or paid campaign staff of an elected official of the local jurisdiction from being appointed to serve on the commission, and requires the commission to submit a report to the legislative body of its findings on the need for changes to the boundaries and its recommended changes, within a specified time after the federal decennial census, as specified. For a commission empowered to change district boundaries, defined as an independent redistricting commission, existing law authorizes the local jurisdiction to prescribe the manner in which members are appointed to the commission, provided that the jurisdiction uses an application process open to all eligible residents. Existing law disqualifies a person or a family member of a person from being appointed to the commission if he or she has engaged in specified activities during the 8 years preceding his or her appointment. Existing law also prohibits a commission member from engaging in specified activities, such as accepting an appointment to an office of the local jurisdiction for 4 years after the date of his or her appointment, or from being a candidate for elective office of the local jurisdiction for 10 years after the date of his or her appointment. Existing law authorizes an independent redistricting commission to impose additional qualifications or restrictions on members of the commission in excess of these provisions. Existing law requires a commission to adopt new boundaries within a specified period of time after the federal decennial census. Existing law prohibits a commission from drawing districts for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against an incumbent or political candidate. This bill would authorize a local jurisdiction to establish a commission by charter amendment. The bill would authorize a local jurisdiction to establish a hybrid redistricting commission, as defined. The bill would, for an advisory redistricting commission, authorize a local jurisdiction to impose additional qualifications and restrictions on the commission, members of the commission, or applicants to the commission in excess of those described above. The bill would eliminate the requirement that an advisory redistricting commission submit a report on its findings and recommended changes within a specified time after the federal decennial census. This bill would, for an independent redistricting commission or a hybrid redistricting commission, prohibit the direct appointment of members of the commission by the legislative body or an elected official of the local jurisdiction. The bill would clarify that a person is disqualified from being appointed to the commission if that person or a family member of that person engages in specified activities preceding the date of that person's appointment. The bill would reduce to 4 years the time period for certain activities of a family member of a person, other than his or her spouse or registered domestic partner, that would disqualify that person from appointment to the commission. The bill would instead prohibit a commission member from accepting an appointment to an office of the local jurisdiction for 2 years, commencing with the date of his or her appointment. The bill would instead prohibit a member from being a candidate for elective office of the local jurisdiction if less than 5 years have elapsed since the date of his or her appointment or if the commission on which the member served adopted or recommended the district boundaries to be used for the election, as specified. The bill would eliminate the requirement that the commission adopt new boundaries within a specified period after the federal decennial census and instead subject the commission to the same redistricting deadlines, requirements, and restrictions that would otherwise apply to a legislative body. The bill would prohibit a legislative body from altering district boundaries that it or a hybrid or independent redistricting commission has adopted until after the next federal decennial census following the adoption of the boundaries, except as specified. The bill would additionally prohibit a commission from drawing districts for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party. The bill would authorize a commission to impose additional requirements and restrictions on a commission or applicants to a commission in excess of these provisions. The bill would authorize a local jurisdiction, except a county, to contract with a county in which the local jurisdiction is located that has established a commission empowered to change district boundaries to have that commission adopt the local jurisdiction's election district boundaries, as specified. The bill would apply the provisions applicable to an independent redistricting commission to a hybrid redistricting commission, as defined. The bill would define "redistricting," for the purposes of these provisions and those described above, to mean either districting or redistricting. The bill would expand the definition of "legislative body" to include a governing board of a school district, a governing board of a community college district, or an elected governing board of a special district. The bill would expand the definition of a "local jurisdiction" to include a school district, community college district, or special district.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/17/18 - Chaptered Current pdf September 17, 2018
- Enrolled 08/21/18 - Enrolled pdf August 21, 2018
- Amended 06/14/18 - Amended Assembly pdf June 14, 2018
- Amended 06/06/18 - Amended Assembly pdf June 06, 2018
- Amended 05/15/18 - Amended Senate pdf May 15, 2018
- Amended 04/04/18 - Amended Senate pdf April 04, 2018
- Amended 03/22/18 - Amended Senate pdf March 22, 2018
- Amended 03/12/18 - Amended Senate pdf March 12, 2018
- Introduced 02/07/18 - Introduced pdf February 07, 2018
- SB1018 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 462, Statutes of 2018.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 5424.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 67. Noes 3. Page 6303.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 27).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 13).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
Referred to Coms. on E. & R. and L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4226.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4914.) (May 2).
-
Set for hearing May 2.
-
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4514.) (April 3).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
Set for hearing April 3.
-
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 10.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Benjamin Allen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Allen, Benjamin Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Delgado | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 67 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 4% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1018 do?
- Existing law authorizes a local jurisdiction, defined as a county or general law city, to establish by resolution or ordinance a commission composed of residents of the local jurisdiction to either change the boundaries of the districts of the local jurisdiction's legislative body or recommend to the governing body changes to the boundaries of the districts. Existing law defines a "legislative body" for these purposes to mean either a city council of a general law city or a county board of supervisors. For a commission that recommends changes to district boundaries, defined as an advisory redistricting commission, existing law prohibits a person who is an elected official of the local jurisdiction or a family member, staff member, or paid campaign staff of an elected official of the local jurisdiction from being appointed to serve on the commission, and requires the commission to submit a report to the legislative body of its findings on the need for changes to the boundaries and its recommended changes, within a specified time after the federal decennial census, as specified. For a commission empowered to change district boundaries, defined as an independent redistricting commission, existing law authorizes the local jurisdiction to prescribe the manner in which members are appointed to the commission, provided that the jurisdiction uses an application process open to all eligible residents. Existing law disqualifies a person or a family member of a person from being appointed to the commission if he or she has engaged in specified activities during the 8 years preceding his or her appointment. Existing law also prohibits a commission member from engaging in specified activities, such as accepting an appointment to an office of the local jurisdiction for 4 years after the date of his or her appointment, or from being a candidate for elective office of the local jurisdiction for 10 years after the date of his or her appointment. Existing law authorizes an independent redistricting commission to impose additional qualifications or restrictions on members of the commission in excess of these provisions. Existing law requires a commission to adopt new boundaries within a specified period of time after the federal decennial census. Existing law prohibits a commission from drawing districts for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against an incumbent or political candidate. This bill would authorize a local jurisdiction to establish a commission by charter amendment. The bill would authorize a local jurisdiction to establish a hybrid redistricting commission, as defined. The bill would, for an advisory redistricting commission, authorize a local jurisdiction to impose additional qualifications and restrictions on the commission, members of the commission, or applicants to the commission in excess of those described above. The bill would eliminate the requirement that an advisory redistricting commission submit a report on its findings and recommended changes within a specified time after the federal decennial census. This bill would, for an independent redistricting commission or a hybrid redistricting commission, prohibit the direct appointment of members of the commission by the legislative body or an elected official of the local jurisdiction. The bill would clarify that a person is disqualified from being appointed to the commission if that person or a family member of that person engages in specified activities preceding the date of that person's appointment. The bill would reduce to 4 years the time period for certain activities of a family member of a person, other than his or her spouse or registered domestic partner, that would disqualify that person from appointment to the commission. The bill would instead prohibit a commission member from accepting an appointment to an office of the local jurisdiction for 2 years, commencing with the date of his or her appointment. The bill would instead prohibit a member from being a candidate for elective office of the local jurisdiction if less than 5 years have elapsed since the date of his or her appointment or if the commission on which the member served adopted or recommended the district boundaries to be used for the election, as specified. The bill would eliminate the requirement that the commission adopt new boundaries within a specified period after the federal decennial census and instead subject the commission to the same redistricting deadlines, requirements, and restrictions that would otherwise apply to a legislative body. The bill would prohibit a legislative body from altering district boundaries that it or a hybrid or independent redistricting commission has adopted until after the next federal decennial census following the adoption of the boundaries, except as specified. The bill would additionally prohibit a commission from drawing districts for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party. The bill would authorize a commission to impose additional requirements and restrictions on a commission or applicants to a commission in excess of these provisions. The bill would authorize a local jurisdiction, except a county, to contract with a county in which the local jurisdiction is located that has established a commission empowered to change district boundaries to have that commission adopt the local jurisdiction's election district boundaries, as specified. The bill would apply the provisions applicable to an independent redistricting commission to a hybrid redistricting commission, as defined. The bill would define "redistricting," for the purposes of these provisions and those described above, to mean either districting or redistricting. The bill would expand the definition of "legislative body" to include a governing board of a school district, a governing board of a community college district, or an elected governing board of a special district. The bill would expand the definition of a "local jurisdiction" to include a school district, community college district, or special district.
- Who sponsors SB 1018?
- SB 1018 is sponsored by Allen, Benjamin (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 1018?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1018?
- Track SB 1018 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1018
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1018
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →