California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

SB 664 — Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: advertising.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 486, Statutes of 2017.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 80% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act generally prohibits a manufacturer, winegrower, distiller, bottler, or wholesaler, among other licensees, or agents of these licensees, from paying a retailer for advertising. The act creates a variety of exceptions from this prohibition, including permitting specified licensees to purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, an on-sale retail licensee that is an owner, manager, or major tenant of certain stadiums, parks, entertainment complexes, and arenas, subject to specified conditions. Existing law requires the purchase of advertising space or time in this context to be conducted pursuant to a written contract with the on-sale licensee, with a specified exception. Existing law makes it a crime for an on-sale licensee to coerce certain licensees to purchase advertising space or time, as specified. This bill would expand the exceptions described above to allow beer manufacturers, winegrowers, distilled spirits rectifiers, distilled spirits manufacturers, or distilled spirits manufacturer's agents to purchase advertising space and time, in connection with described events, from, or on behalf of, on-sale retail licensees, as described above, at specified facilities located in the City and County of San Francisco. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 25503.6 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 582 and AB 1724 that would become operative if this bill and SB 582, this bill and AB 1724, or all 3 bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 486, Statutes of 2017.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2846.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Ordered to unfinished business.

  6. From special consent calendar on motion of Senator Jackson.

  7. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  8. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 2720.)

  9. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2492.) Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  10. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).

  11. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  12. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2964.) Ordered to the Senate.

  13. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Read third time and amended.

  15. Ordered to third reading.

  16. From consent calendar on motion of Assembly Member Calderon.

  17. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  18. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 19).

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  21. June 21 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.

  23. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  24. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  25. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 770.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  26. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  27. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  28. Set for hearing April 17.

  29. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  30. Set for hearing March 28.

  31. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  32. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  33. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chiu · Cosponsor
  • Dodd · Primary
  • Glazer · Cosponsor
  • Ting · Cosponsor
  • Scott D. Wiener · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Dodd

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB664 Dodd et al.

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35000
Democratic 5000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Newman — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
De León — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Allen — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Roth — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

SB 664 Dodd Senate Third Reading By TING

Passed 75 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 54004
Democratic 15000
Republican 6000
Total 75004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Holden — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Not Voting
Santiago — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Wood — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Harper — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Burke — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gray — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Levine — Yea
Quirk — Not Voting
Rodriguez — Yea
Steinorth — Not Voting
Ting — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Not Voting
Jim Patterson — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 664 do?
The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act generally prohibits a manufacturer, winegrower, distiller, bottler, or wholesaler, among other licensees, or agents of these licensees, from paying a retailer for advertising. The act creates a variety of exceptions from this prohibition, including permitting specified licensees to purchase advertising space and time from, or on behalf of, an on-sale retail licensee that is an owner, manager, or major tenant of certain stadiums, parks, entertainment complexes, and arenas, subject to specified conditions. Existing law requires the purchase of advertising space or time in this context to be conducted pursuant to a written contract with the on-sale licensee, with a specified exception. Existing law makes it a crime for an on-sale licensee to coerce certain licensees to purchase advertising space or time, as specified. This bill would expand the exceptions described above to allow beer manufacturers, winegrowers, distilled spirits rectifiers, distilled spirits manufacturers, or distilled spirits manufacturer's agents to purchase advertising space and time, in connection with described events, from, or on behalf of, on-sale retail licensees, as described above, at specified facilities located in the City and County of San Francisco. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 25503.6 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 582 and AB 1724 that would become operative if this bill and SB 582, this bill and AB 1724, or all 3 bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Who sponsors SB 664?
SB 664 is sponsored by Chiu, Dodd, Glazer, Ting, and Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 664?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 664?
Track SB 664 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 664

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 664

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →