Deferred entry of judgment: pretrial diversion.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 208 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 208.
You're tracking AB 208
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 208 — Deferred entry of judgment: pretrial diversion.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 778, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law allows individuals charged with specified crimes to qualify for deferred entry of judgment. A defendant qualifies if he or she has no conviction for any offense involving controlled substances, the charged offense did not involve violence, there is no evidence of a violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation that qualifies for the program, the defendant's record does not indicate that probation or parole has ever been revoked without being completed, and the defendant's record does not indicate that he or she has been granted diversion, deferred entry of judgment, or was convicted of a felony within 5 years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense. Under the existing deferred entry of judgment program, an eligible defendant may have entry of judgment deferred, upon pleading guilty to the offenses charged and entering a drug treatment program for 18 months to 3 years. If the defendant does not perform satisfactorily in the program, does not benefit from the program, is convicted of specified crimes, or engages in criminal activity rendering him or her unsuitable for deferred entry of judgment, the defendant's guilty plea is entered and the court enters judgment and proceeds to schedule a sentencing hearing. If the defendant completes the program, the criminal charges are dismissed. Existing law allows the presiding judge of the superior court, with the district attorney and public defender, to establish a pretrial diversion drug program. This bill would make the deferred entry of judgment program a pretrial diversion program. The bill would make a defendant qualified for the pretrial diversion program if there is no evidence of a contemporaneous violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation of the offense that qualifies him or her for diversion, the charged offense did not involve violence, there is no evidence within the past 5 years of a violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation that qualifies for the program, and the defendant has no prior conviction for a felony within 5 years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense. Under the pretrial diversion program created by this bill, a qualifying defendant would enter a plea of not guilty and waive his or her right to a trial by jury, and proceedings would be suspended in order for the defendant to enter a drug treatment program for 12 to 18 months, or longer if requested by the defendant with good cause. The bill would require the court, if the defendant does not perform satisfactorily in the program or is convicted of specified crimes, to terminate the program and reinstate the criminal proceedings. The bill would require the criminal charges to be dismissed if the defendant completes the program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1000.4 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 393 to be operative only if this bill and SB 393 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/14/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 14, 2017
- Enrolled 09/15/17 - Enrolled pdf September 15, 2017
- Amended 09/08/17 - Amended Senate pdf September 08, 2017
- Amended 09/01/17 - Amended Senate pdf September 01, 2017
- Amended 03/08/17 - Amended Assembly pdf March 08, 2017
- Introduced 01/23/17 - Introduced pdf January 23, 2017
- AB208 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 778, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 45. Noes 29. Page 3372.).
-
Assembly Rule 77(a) suspended. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 3255.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 15. Page 2776.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (July 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 27. Page 2055.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 26).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (March 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 23.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Eggman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 16 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Eggman
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 20 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 45 | 29 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 37% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 38% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 20 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 46 | 27 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 34% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 208 do?
- Existing law allows individuals charged with specified crimes to qualify for deferred entry of judgment. A defendant qualifies if he or she has no conviction for any offense involving controlled substances, the charged offense did not involve violence, there is no evidence of a violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation that qualifies for the program, the defendant's record does not indicate that probation or parole has ever been revoked without being completed, and the defendant's record does not indicate that he or she has been granted diversion, deferred entry of judgment, or was convicted of a felony within 5 years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense. Under the existing deferred entry of judgment program, an eligible defendant may have entry of judgment deferred, upon pleading guilty to the offenses charged and entering a drug treatment program for 18 months to 3 years. If the defendant does not perform satisfactorily in the program, does not benefit from the program, is convicted of specified crimes, or engages in criminal activity rendering him or her unsuitable for deferred entry of judgment, the defendant's guilty plea is entered and the court enters judgment and proceeds to schedule a sentencing hearing. If the defendant completes the program, the criminal charges are dismissed. Existing law allows the presiding judge of the superior court, with the district attorney and public defender, to establish a pretrial diversion drug program. This bill would make the deferred entry of judgment program a pretrial diversion program. The bill would make a defendant qualified for the pretrial diversion program if there is no evidence of a contemporaneous violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation of the offense that qualifies him or her for diversion, the charged offense did not involve violence, there is no evidence within the past 5 years of a violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation that qualifies for the program, and the defendant has no prior conviction for a felony within 5 years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense. Under the pretrial diversion program created by this bill, a qualifying defendant would enter a plea of not guilty and waive his or her right to a trial by jury, and proceedings would be suspended in order for the defendant to enter a drug treatment program for 12 to 18 months, or longer if requested by the defendant with good cause. The bill would require the court, if the defendant does not perform satisfactorily in the program or is convicted of specified crimes, to terminate the program and reinstate the criminal proceedings. The bill would require the criminal charges to be dismissed if the defendant completes the program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1000.4 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 393 to be operative only if this bill and SB 393 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
- Who sponsors AB 208?
- AB 208 is sponsored by Eggman.
- What is the current status of AB 208?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 208?
- Track AB 208 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 208
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 208
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →