Legislature: Whistleblower protection and retaliation prevention.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 419 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 419.
You're tracking SB 419
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 419 — Legislature: Whistleblower protection and retaliation prevention.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 952, Statutes of 2018.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
18 sponsors
1 primary, 17 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Legislative Employee Whistleblower Protection Act, imposes criminal and civil liability on a Member of the Legislature or legislative employee, as defined, who interferes with, or retaliates against, a legislative employee's exercise of the right to make a protected disclosure, which is defined as a good faith allegation made by a legislative employee to specified entities that a Member of the Legislature or a legislative employee has engaged in, or will engage in, activity that may constitute a violation of law or a violation of a legislative standard of conduct. This bill would define "protected disclosure" for purposes of that act to also include a complaint made at the request of a legislative employee and a complaint made against a nonemployee in specified circumstances. Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) , protects and safeguards the right and opportunity of all persons to generally seek, obtain, and hold employment without discrimination, abridgment, or harassment on account of enumerated protected categories. Existing law also precludes an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or person from discharging, expelling, or otherwise discriminating against any person because the person has opposed any practices forbidden under FEHA or because the person has filed a complaint, testified, or assisted in any FEHA proceeding. Existing law, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, states that all people in California are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments, no matter their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status. Existing law establishes a cause of action for violations of that act. Existing law also separately establishes liability for sexual harassment if a plaintiff proves specified elements, including, among other things, that there is a business, service, or professional relationship between the plaintiff and defendant. This bill would declare that neither house of the Legislature may retaliate against a legislative advocate or employee, as defined, because that person has opposed any practices forbidden under the above provisions, or filed a complaint, testified, or assisted in any proceeding relating to a complaint of harassment under those provisions. This bill would impose civil liability for a violation of that prohibition. This bill would also require each house of the Legislature to maintain a record of each harassment complaint made to that house for a period of at least 12 years after the complaint is made. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/18 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2018
- Enrolled 09/07/18 - Enrolled pdf September 07, 2018
- Amended 08/27/18 - Amended Assembly pdf August 27, 2018
- Amended 08/21/18 - Amended Assembly pdf August 21, 2018
- Amended 08/06/18 - Amended Assembly pdf August 06, 2018
- Amended 01/24/18 - Amended Senate pdf January 24, 2018
- Amended 01/11/18 - Amended Senate pdf January 11, 2018
- Amended 01/04/18 - Amended Senate pdf January 04, 2018
- Amended 04/17/17 - Amended Senate pdf April 17, 2017
- Amended 03/20/17 - Amended Senate pdf March 20, 2017
- Introduced 02/15/17 - Introduced pdf February 15, 2017
- SB419 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 952, Statutes of 2018.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 6152.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (August 24).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 3).
-
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and RLS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 4126.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 4020.) (January 9).
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing January 9 in JUD. pending receipt.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Set for hearing January 8.
-
April 24 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Set for hearing April 24.
-
April 17 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and JUD.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and B., P. & E.D.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 18.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Portantino · Primary
- Atkins · Cosponsor
- De León · Cosponsor
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Beall · Cosponsor
- Burke · Cosponsor
- Dodd · Cosponsor
- Galgiani · Cosponsor
- Hernandez · Cosponsor
- Hertzberg · Cosponsor
- Hill · Cosponsor
- Leyva · Cosponsor
- Mike McGuire · Cosponsor
- Roth · Cosponsor
- Henry I. Stern · Cosponsor
- Scott D. Wiener · Cosponsor
- Sabrina Cervantes · Cosponsor
- Susan Rubio · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 104 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Portantino
Co-sponsors (17)
- Atkins
- De León
- Bates
- Beall
- Burke
- Dodd
- Galgiani
- Hernandez
- Hertzberg
- Hill
- Leyva
- McGuire, Mike Democratic
- Roth
- Stern, Henry I. Democratic
- Wiener, Scott D. Democratic
- Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic
- Rubio, Susan Democratic
Not signed on (104)
104 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 104 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Delgado | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 57 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 419 do?
- Existing law, the Legislative Employee Whistleblower Protection Act, imposes criminal and civil liability on a Member of the Legislature or legislative employee, as defined, who interferes with, or retaliates against, a legislative employee's exercise of the right to make a protected disclosure, which is defined as a good faith allegation made by a legislative employee to specified entities that a Member of the Legislature or a legislative employee has engaged in, or will engage in, activity that may constitute a violation of law or a violation of a legislative standard of conduct. This bill would define "protected disclosure" for purposes of that act to also include a complaint made at the request of a legislative employee and a complaint made against a nonemployee in specified circumstances. Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) , protects and safeguards the right and opportunity of all persons to generally seek, obtain, and hold employment without discrimination, abridgment, or harassment on account of enumerated protected categories. Existing law also precludes an employer, labor organization, employment agency, or person from discharging, expelling, or otherwise discriminating against any person because the person has opposed any practices forbidden under FEHA or because the person has filed a complaint, testified, or assisted in any FEHA proceeding. Existing law, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, states that all people in California are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments, no matter their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status. Existing law establishes a cause of action for violations of that act. Existing law also separately establishes liability for sexual harassment if a plaintiff proves specified elements, including, among other things, that there is a business, service, or professional relationship between the plaintiff and defendant. This bill would declare that neither house of the Legislature may retaliate against a legislative advocate or employee, as defined, because that person has opposed any practices forbidden under the above provisions, or filed a complaint, testified, or assisted in any proceeding relating to a complaint of harassment under those provisions. This bill would impose civil liability for a violation of that prohibition. This bill would also require each house of the Legislature to maintain a record of each harassment complaint made to that house for a period of at least 12 years after the complaint is made. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 419?
- SB 419 is sponsored by Portantino, Atkins, De León, Bates, Beall, Burke, Dodd, Galgiani, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Leyva, McGuire, Mike (Democratic), Roth, Stern, Henry I. (Democratic), Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic), Cervantes, Sabrina (Democratic), and Rubio, Susan (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 419?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 419?
- Track SB 419 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 419
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 419
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →