California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 3250 — Civil law: civil rights.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 776, Statutes of 2018.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law encompasses provisions pertaining to the civil law of the state, including laws concerning persons, property, and obligations, among other subjects. This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to enact omnibus legislation relating to civil law. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants. Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to be registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in which he or she maintains a branch office, and provide proof that the registrant has satisfied a specified bonding requirement. Existing law requires an applicant for renewal of registration as a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to complete 15 hours of continuing legal education courses that meet specified requirements relating to attorneys during the 2-year period preceding renewal. This bill would specify that a registrant is not required to complete legal ethics education as part of the required 15 hours of continuing legal education courses. The Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976 provides, in part, that all persons within the jurisdiction of this state have the right to be free from any violence, or intimidation by threat of violence, on account of their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, or sexual orientation. This bill would repeal the uncodified provision entitling the Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976, and would instead include that title in the above-described provision. Under existing law, if a person or persons, whether or not acting under color of law, interferes or attempts to interfere, by threats, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state, the Attorney General, or any district attorney or city attorney, is authorized to bring a civil action for injunctive and other appropriate equitable relief in the name of the people of the State of California, in order to protect the exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured. Existing law also authorizes an individual whose exercise or enjoyment of those rights has been interfered with, or attempted to be interfered with, as described, to institute and prosecute a civil action for damages, including, but not limited to, specified damages, injunctive relief, and other appropriate equitable relief to protect the peaceable exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured. Existing law, in an uncodified provision of law, entitles the act that added these provisions as the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act. This bill would codify that title in the above-described statutory provisions. Existing law requires in specific proceedings, where a participant is hearing impaired, that the individual who is hearing impaired, as defined, be provided, upon request, with a functioning assistive listening system or a computer-aided transcription system, as prescribed. This bill would revise those provisions to replace the term "individual who is hearing impaired" to instead refer to an "individual who is deaf or hard of hearing." Existing law requires the court, before the entry of a judgment in a class action, to determine the total amount that will be payable to all class members, and to set a date when the parties are to report to the court the total amount that was actually paid to the class members. Existing law requires the court, after the report is received, to amend the judgment to direct the defendant to pay the sum of the unpaid residue or unclaimed or abandoned class member funds, plus interest on that sum at the legal rate of interest from the date of entry of the initial judgment, to specified entities. This bill would revise the interest provision to delete reference to the legal rate of interest or the date of entry of the initial judgment and refer, instead, to any interest that has accrued on the sum. Existing law, until July 1, 2019, establishes procedures for conducting mandatory expedited jury trials in limited civil cases. This bill would remove the repeal date on these provisions, thereby making the procedures operative indefinitely. Existing law relating to service of documents in civil actions authorizes proof of electronic service to be made by specified methods. This bill would replace certain references to filing with references to electronic service. Existing law requires applications for change of names to be made to the superior court of the county where the person whose name is proposed to be changed resides, except as specified, either by petition signed by the person or, if the person is under 18, by one of the person's parents, by any guardian of the person, or, under certain circumstances, by a near relative or friend. Existing law requires that petitions for the change of the name of a minor submitted by a guardian appointed by the juvenile court or the probate court be made in the appointing court. This bill would include among the persons authorized to make such a petition a court-appointed dependency attorney appointed as guardian ad litem pursuant to specified rules of court. The bill would authorize petitions for the change of name of a nonminor dependent to be made in the juvenile court. Existing law, commencing September 1, 2018, authorizes a change of gender in a court judgment to female, male, or nonbinary. Existing law establishes procedures to obtain a court order for a change of name to conform to the petitioner's gender identity and a court order to recognize a change in the petitioner's gender. Existing law provides a separate procedure for a person under 18 years of age to petition for a court judgment to recognize a change of gender to female, male, or nonbinary. Existing law, with regard to the conforming change of name, prescribes the making of an order to show cause with regard to the petition. Under existing law, objections based solely on concerns over the petitioner's actual gender identity do not constitute good cause. This bill would require, in the case of a conforming name change petition for a minor that does not include the signatures of both living parents, that the petition and the order to show cause be served as prescribed on the nonsigning parent within 30 days of the order. The bill would revise the objections provision in the conforming name change provisions so that objections based solely on concerns that the proposed change is not the petitioner's actual gender identity or gender assigned at birth would not constitute good cause. The bill would revise the 18-and-over and under-18 procedures for obtaining a court order to recognize a change in a petitioner's gender. Changes to the procedure for minors would include revised standards for hearing and for granting or denying the petition. The bill would require petitions for minors signed by a guardian appointed by the juvenile court or the probate court, or by a court-appointed dependency attorney appointed as guardian ad litem pursuant to specified rules of court to be made in the appointing court. The bill would authorize petitions to recognize a change of the gender of a nonminor dependent to be made in the juvenile court. The bill would establish specific additional provisions for petitions signed by a guardian. Existing law, the Insurance Rate Reduction and Reform Act, enacted by Proposition 103, as approved by the voters at the November 8, 1988, statewide general election, subjects the business of insurance to the laws of this state applicable to any other business, including, but not limited to, civil rights laws. This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to this provision by removing an incorrect title for the cross-referenced civil rights laws. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 54.8 of the Civil Code proposed by AB 2531 to be operative only if this bill and AB 2531 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 776, Statutes of 2018.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 65. Noes 9. Page 6910.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6773.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 7. Page 5907.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 3).

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  13. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  14. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 4941.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  18. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 24).

  19. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  20. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  21. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  22. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Judiciary · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Judiciary

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 65 Yea · 9 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 46606
Democratic 16000
Republican 3300
Total 65906
% of votes cast 81%11%0%8%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Levine — Yea
Melendez — Nay
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Low — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chau — Yea
Medina — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Burke — Yea
Gray — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Harper — Nay
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Kiley — Not Voting
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Fong — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Bigelow — Not Voting
Chiu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Not Voting
Cunningham — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 30 Yea · 7 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 25703
Democratic 5000
Total 30703
% of votes cast 75%18%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Chang — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Glazer — Yea
De León — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Delgado — Not Voting
Dodd — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Lara — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3200
Democratic 2000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Moorlach — Nay
Hertzberg — Yea
Monning — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 55002
Democratic 15000
Republican 6000
Total 76002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Harper — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Chávez — Not Voting
Cooper — Yea
Chau — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Medina — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Burke — Yea
Fong — Yea
Salas — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 3250 do?
Existing law encompasses provisions pertaining to the civil law of the state, including laws concerning persons, property, and obligations, among other subjects. This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to enact omnibus legislation relating to civil law. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants. Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to be registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in which he or she maintains a branch office, and provide proof that the registrant has satisfied a specified bonding requirement. Existing law requires an applicant for renewal of registration as a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to complete 15 hours of continuing legal education courses that meet specified requirements relating to attorneys during the 2-year period preceding renewal. This bill would specify that a registrant is not required to complete legal ethics education as part of the required 15 hours of continuing legal education courses. The Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976 provides, in part, that all persons within the jurisdiction of this state have the right to be free from any violence, or intimidation by threat of violence, on account of their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, or sexual orientation. This bill would repeal the uncodified provision entitling the Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976, and would instead include that title in the above-described provision. Under existing law, if a person or persons, whether or not acting under color of law, interferes or attempts to interfere, by threats, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state, the Attorney General, or any district attorney or city attorney, is authorized to bring a civil action for injunctive and other appropriate equitable relief in the name of the people of the State of California, in order to protect the exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured. Existing law also authorizes an individual whose exercise or enjoyment of those rights has been interfered with, or attempted to be interfered with, as described, to institute and prosecute a civil action for damages, including, but not limited to, specified damages, injunctive relief, and other appropriate equitable relief to protect the peaceable exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured. Existing law, in an uncodified provision of law, entitles the act that added these provisions as the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act. This bill would codify that title in the above-described statutory provisions. Existing law requires in specific proceedings, where a participant is hearing impaired, that the individual who is hearing impaired, as defined, be provided, upon request, with a functioning assistive listening system or a computer-aided transcription system, as prescribed. This bill would revise those provisions to replace the term "individual who is hearing impaired" to instead refer to an "individual who is deaf or hard of hearing." Existing law requires the court, before the entry of a judgment in a class action, to determine the total amount that will be payable to all class members, and to set a date when the parties are to report to the court the total amount that was actually paid to the class members. Existing law requires the court, after the report is received, to amend the judgment to direct the defendant to pay the sum of the unpaid residue or unclaimed or abandoned class member funds, plus interest on that sum at the legal rate of interest from the date of entry of the initial judgment, to specified entities. This bill would revise the interest provision to delete reference to the legal rate of interest or the date of entry of the initial judgment and refer, instead, to any interest that has accrued on the sum. Existing law, until July 1, 2019, establishes procedures for conducting mandatory expedited jury trials in limited civil cases. This bill would remove the repeal date on these provisions, thereby making the procedures operative indefinitely. Existing law relating to service of documents in civil actions authorizes proof of electronic service to be made by specified methods. This bill would replace certain references to filing with references to electronic service. Existing law requires applications for change of names to be made to the superior court of the county where the person whose name is proposed to be changed resides, except as specified, either by petition signed by the person or, if the person is under 18, by one of the person's parents, by any guardian of the person, or, under certain circumstances, by a near relative or friend. Existing law requires that petitions for the change of the name of a minor submitted by a guardian appointed by the juvenile court or the probate court be made in the appointing court. This bill would include among the persons authorized to make such a petition a court-appointed dependency attorney appointed as guardian ad litem pursuant to specified rules of court. The bill would authorize petitions for the change of name of a nonminor dependent to be made in the juvenile court. Existing law, commencing September 1, 2018, authorizes a change of gender in a court judgment to female, male, or nonbinary. Existing law establishes procedures to obtain a court order for a change of name to conform to the petitioner's gender identity and a court order to recognize a change in the petitioner's gender. Existing law provides a separate procedure for a person under 18 years of age to petition for a court judgment to recognize a change of gender to female, male, or nonbinary. Existing law, with regard to the conforming change of name, prescribes the making of an order to show cause with regard to the petition. Under existing law, objections based solely on concerns over the petitioner's actual gender identity do not constitute good cause. This bill would require, in the case of a conforming name change petition for a minor that does not include the signatures of both living parents, that the petition and the order to show cause be served as prescribed on the nonsigning parent within 30 days of the order. The bill would revise the objections provision in the conforming name change provisions so that objections based solely on concerns that the proposed change is not the petitioner's actual gender identity or gender assigned at birth would not constitute good cause. The bill would revise the 18-and-over and under-18 procedures for obtaining a court order to recognize a change in a petitioner's gender. Changes to the procedure for minors would include revised standards for hearing and for granting or denying the petition. The bill would require petitions for minors signed by a guardian appointed by the juvenile court or the probate court, or by a court-appointed dependency attorney appointed as guardian ad litem pursuant to specified rules of court to be made in the appointing court. The bill would authorize petitions to recognize a change of the gender of a nonminor dependent to be made in the juvenile court. The bill would establish specific additional provisions for petitions signed by a guardian. Existing law, the Insurance Rate Reduction and Reform Act, enacted by Proposition 103, as approved by the voters at the November 8, 1988, statewide general election, subjects the business of insurance to the laws of this state applicable to any other business, including, but not limited to, civil rights laws. This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to this provision by removing an incorrect title for the cross-referenced civil rights laws. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 54.8 of the Civil Code proposed by AB 2531 to be operative only if this bill and AB 2531 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Who sponsors AB 3250?
AB 3250 is sponsored by Committee on Judiciary.
What is the current status of AB 3250?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 3250?
Track AB 3250 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 3250

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 3250

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →