Civil law: civil rights.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 3250 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 3250.
You're tracking AB 3250
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 3250 — Civil law: civil rights.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 776, Statutes of 2018.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law encompasses provisions pertaining to the civil law of the state, including laws concerning persons, property, and obligations, among other subjects. This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to enact omnibus legislation relating to civil law. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants. Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to be registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in which he or she maintains a branch office, and provide proof that the registrant has satisfied a specified bonding requirement. Existing law requires an applicant for renewal of registration as a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to complete 15 hours of continuing legal education courses that meet specified requirements relating to attorneys during the 2-year period preceding renewal. This bill would specify that a registrant is not required to complete legal ethics education as part of the required 15 hours of continuing legal education courses. The Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976 provides, in part, that all persons within the jurisdiction of this state have the right to be free from any violence, or intimidation by threat of violence, on account of their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, or sexual orientation. This bill would repeal the uncodified provision entitling the Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976, and would instead include that title in the above-described provision. Under existing law, if a person or persons, whether or not acting under color of law, interferes or attempts to interfere, by threats, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state, the Attorney General, or any district attorney or city attorney, is authorized to bring a civil action for injunctive and other appropriate equitable relief in the name of the people of the State of California, in order to protect the exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured. Existing law also authorizes an individual whose exercise or enjoyment of those rights has been interfered with, or attempted to be interfered with, as described, to institute and prosecute a civil action for damages, including, but not limited to, specified damages, injunctive relief, and other appropriate equitable relief to protect the peaceable exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured. Existing law, in an uncodified provision of law, entitles the act that added these provisions as the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act. This bill would codify that title in the above-described statutory provisions. Existing law requires in specific proceedings, where a participant is hearing impaired, that the individual who is hearing impaired, as defined, be provided, upon request, with a functioning assistive listening system or a computer-aided transcription system, as prescribed. This bill would revise those provisions to replace the term "individual who is hearing impaired" to instead refer to an "individual who is deaf or hard of hearing." Existing law requires the court, before the entry of a judgment in a class action, to determine the total amount that will be payable to all class members, and to set a date when the parties are to report to the court the total amount that was actually paid to the class members. Existing law requires the court, after the report is received, to amend the judgment to direct the defendant to pay the sum of the unpaid residue or unclaimed or abandoned class member funds, plus interest on that sum at the legal rate of interest from the date of entry of the initial judgment, to specified entities. This bill would revise the interest provision to delete reference to the legal rate of interest or the date of entry of the initial judgment and refer, instead, to any interest that has accrued on the sum. Existing law, until July 1, 2019, establishes procedures for conducting mandatory expedited jury trials in limited civil cases. This bill would remove the repeal date on these provisions, thereby making the procedures operative indefinitely. Existing law relating to service of documents in civil actions authorizes proof of electronic service to be made by specified methods. This bill would replace certain references to filing with references to electronic service. Existing law requires applications for change of names to be made to the superior court of the county where the person whose name is proposed to be changed resides, except as specified, either by petition signed by the person or, if the person is under 18, by one of the person's parents, by any guardian of the person, or, under certain circumstances, by a near relative or friend. Existing law requires that petitions for the change of the name of a minor submitted by a guardian appointed by the juvenile court or the probate court be made in the appointing court. This bill would include among the persons authorized to make such a petition a court-appointed dependency attorney appointed as guardian ad litem pursuant to specified rules of court. The bill would authorize petitions for the change of name of a nonminor dependent to be made in the juvenile court. Existing law, commencing September 1, 2018, authorizes a change of gender in a court judgment to female, male, or nonbinary. Existing law establishes procedures to obtain a court order for a change of name to conform to the petitioner's gender identity and a court order to recognize a change in the petitioner's gender. Existing law provides a separate procedure for a person under 18 years of age to petition for a court judgment to recognize a change of gender to female, male, or nonbinary. Existing law, with regard to the conforming change of name, prescribes the making of an order to show cause with regard to the petition. Under existing law, objections based solely on concerns over the petitioner's actual gender identity do not constitute good cause. This bill would require, in the case of a conforming name change petition for a minor that does not include the signatures of both living parents, that the petition and the order to show cause be served as prescribed on the nonsigning parent within 30 days of the order. The bill would revise the objections provision in the conforming name change provisions so that objections based solely on concerns that the proposed change is not the petitioner's actual gender identity or gender assigned at birth would not constitute good cause. The bill would revise the 18-and-over and under-18 procedures for obtaining a court order to recognize a change in a petitioner's gender. Changes to the procedure for minors would include revised standards for hearing and for granting or denying the petition. The bill would require petitions for minors signed by a guardian appointed by the juvenile court or the probate court, or by a court-appointed dependency attorney appointed as guardian ad litem pursuant to specified rules of court to be made in the appointing court. The bill would authorize petitions to recognize a change of the gender of a nonminor dependent to be made in the juvenile court. The bill would establish specific additional provisions for petitions signed by a guardian. Existing law, the Insurance Rate Reduction and Reform Act, enacted by Proposition 103, as approved by the voters at the November 8, 1988, statewide general election, subjects the business of insurance to the laws of this state applicable to any other business, including, but not limited to, civil rights laws. This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to this provision by removing an incorrect title for the cross-referenced civil rights laws. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 54.8 of the Civil Code proposed by AB 2531 to be operative only if this bill and AB 2531 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/26/18 - Chaptered Current pdf September 26, 2018
- Enrolled 08/31/18 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2018
- Amended 08/24/18 - Amended Senate pdf August 24, 2018
- Amended 06/25/18 - Amended Senate pdf June 25, 2018
- Amended 04/16/18 - Amended Assembly pdf April 16, 2018
- Introduced 02/27/18 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2018
- AB3250 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 776, Statutes of 2018.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 65. Noes 9. Page 6910.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6773.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 7. Page 5907.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 3).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 4941.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 24).
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Judiciary · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Judiciary
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 65 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 11% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 18% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Delgado | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 3250 do?
- Existing law encompasses provisions pertaining to the civil law of the state, including laws concerning persons, property, and obligations, among other subjects. This bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to enact omnibus legislation relating to civil law. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants. Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to be registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in which he or she maintains a branch office, and provide proof that the registrant has satisfied a specified bonding requirement. Existing law requires an applicant for renewal of registration as a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to complete 15 hours of continuing legal education courses that meet specified requirements relating to attorneys during the 2-year period preceding renewal. This bill would specify that a registrant is not required to complete legal ethics education as part of the required 15 hours of continuing legal education courses. The Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976 provides, in part, that all persons within the jurisdiction of this state have the right to be free from any violence, or intimidation by threat of violence, on account of their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, or sexual orientation. This bill would repeal the uncodified provision entitling the Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976, and would instead include that title in the above-described provision. Under existing law, if a person or persons, whether or not acting under color of law, interferes or attempts to interfere, by threats, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state, the Attorney General, or any district attorney or city attorney, is authorized to bring a civil action for injunctive and other appropriate equitable relief in the name of the people of the State of California, in order to protect the exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured. Existing law also authorizes an individual whose exercise or enjoyment of those rights has been interfered with, or attempted to be interfered with, as described, to institute and prosecute a civil action for damages, including, but not limited to, specified damages, injunctive relief, and other appropriate equitable relief to protect the peaceable exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured. Existing law, in an uncodified provision of law, entitles the act that added these provisions as the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act. This bill would codify that title in the above-described statutory provisions. Existing law requires in specific proceedings, where a participant is hearing impaired, that the individual who is hearing impaired, as defined, be provided, upon request, with a functioning assistive listening system or a computer-aided transcription system, as prescribed. This bill would revise those provisions to replace the term "individual who is hearing impaired" to instead refer to an "individual who is deaf or hard of hearing." Existing law requires the court, before the entry of a judgment in a class action, to determine the total amount that will be payable to all class members, and to set a date when the parties are to report to the court the total amount that was actually paid to the class members. Existing law requires the court, after the report is received, to amend the judgment to direct the defendant to pay the sum of the unpaid residue or unclaimed or abandoned class member funds, plus interest on that sum at the legal rate of interest from the date of entry of the initial judgment, to specified entities. This bill would revise the interest provision to delete reference to the legal rate of interest or the date of entry of the initial judgment and refer, instead, to any interest that has accrued on the sum. Existing law, until July 1, 2019, establishes procedures for conducting mandatory expedited jury trials in limited civil cases. This bill would remove the repeal date on these provisions, thereby making the procedures operative indefinitely. Existing law relating to service of documents in civil actions authorizes proof of electronic service to be made by specified methods. This bill would replace certain references to filing with references to electronic service. Existing law requires applications for change of names to be made to the superior court of the county where the person whose name is proposed to be changed resides, except as specified, either by petition signed by the person or, if the person is under 18, by one of the person's parents, by any guardian of the person, or, under certain circumstances, by a near relative or friend. Existing law requires that petitions for the change of the name of a minor submitted by a guardian appointed by the juvenile court or the probate court be made in the appointing court. This bill would include among the persons authorized to make such a petition a court-appointed dependency attorney appointed as guardian ad litem pursuant to specified rules of court. The bill would authorize petitions for the change of name of a nonminor dependent to be made in the juvenile court. Existing law, commencing September 1, 2018, authorizes a change of gender in a court judgment to female, male, or nonbinary. Existing law establishes procedures to obtain a court order for a change of name to conform to the petitioner's gender identity and a court order to recognize a change in the petitioner's gender. Existing law provides a separate procedure for a person under 18 years of age to petition for a court judgment to recognize a change of gender to female, male, or nonbinary. Existing law, with regard to the conforming change of name, prescribes the making of an order to show cause with regard to the petition. Under existing law, objections based solely on concerns over the petitioner's actual gender identity do not constitute good cause. This bill would require, in the case of a conforming name change petition for a minor that does not include the signatures of both living parents, that the petition and the order to show cause be served as prescribed on the nonsigning parent within 30 days of the order. The bill would revise the objections provision in the conforming name change provisions so that objections based solely on concerns that the proposed change is not the petitioner's actual gender identity or gender assigned at birth would not constitute good cause. The bill would revise the 18-and-over and under-18 procedures for obtaining a court order to recognize a change in a petitioner's gender. Changes to the procedure for minors would include revised standards for hearing and for granting or denying the petition. The bill would require petitions for minors signed by a guardian appointed by the juvenile court or the probate court, or by a court-appointed dependency attorney appointed as guardian ad litem pursuant to specified rules of court to be made in the appointing court. The bill would authorize petitions to recognize a change of the gender of a nonminor dependent to be made in the juvenile court. The bill would establish specific additional provisions for petitions signed by a guardian. Existing law, the Insurance Rate Reduction and Reform Act, enacted by Proposition 103, as approved by the voters at the November 8, 1988, statewide general election, subjects the business of insurance to the laws of this state applicable to any other business, including, but not limited to, civil rights laws. This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to this provision by removing an incorrect title for the cross-referenced civil rights laws. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 54.8 of the Civil Code proposed by AB 2531 to be operative only if this bill and AB 2531 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
- Who sponsors AB 3250?
- AB 3250 is sponsored by Committee on Judiciary.
- What is the current status of AB 3250?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 3250?
- Track AB 3250 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 3250
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 3250
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →