Gender identity: female, male, or nonbinary.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 179 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 179.
You're tracking SB 179
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 179 — Gender identity: female, male, or nonbinary.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 853, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 24, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
22 sponsors
1 primary, 21 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 10 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes a person who was born in this state and who has undergone clinically appropriate treatment for the purpose of gender transition to obtain a new birth certificate from the State Registrar. This bill would enact the Gender Recognition Act. For purposes of obtaining a new birth certificate under the provisions above, the bill would delete the requirement that an applicant have undergone any treatment, and instead would authorize a person to submit to the State Registrar an application to change gender on the birth certificate and an affidavit attesting, under penalty of perjury, that the request for a change of gender is to conform the person's legal gender to the person's gender identity and not for any fraudulent purpose. By requiring the affidavit to be attested to under penalty of perjury, the bill would create a crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the change of gender on a new birth certificate to be female, male, or nonbinary. (2) Existing law authorizes a person who has undergone clinically appropriate treatment for the purpose of gender transition to petition for a court judgment recognizing the change of gender, and to petition for a court order conforming the person's name to the person's gender identity. Existing law provides specific procedures to seek these orders and judgments, either separately or in combination. This bill, commencing on September 1, 2018, would delete the requirement that a person have undergone any treatment to seek a court judgment to recognize a change of gender and instead would authorize the petitioner to attest, under penalty of perjury, that the request is to conform the person's legal gender to the person's gender identity and not for any fraudulent purpose. By requiring the affidavit to be attested to under penalty of perjury, the bill would create a crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize a change of gender in the court judgment to female, male, or nonbinary. The bill would provide modified procedures to obtain a court order for a change of name to conform to the petitioner's gender identity and a court judgment to recognize a change in the petitioner's gender. The bill would provide a separate procedure for a person under 18 years of age to petition for a court judgment to recognize a change of gender to female, male, or nonbinary. (3) Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue a driver's license to an applicant when the department determines that the applicant is lawfully entitled to a license, and requires the license to contain, among other things, a brief description and engraved picture or photograph of the licensee for the purpose of identification. Existing law requires the application for an original driver's license or renewal of a driver's license to contain specified information, as provided by the applicant. Existing law also authorizes the department to issue identification cards and requires an identification card to adequately describe the applicant. Existing law requires the department, upon issuance of a new identification card or renewal of an identification card, to provide information regarding organ and tissue donation, including an enrollment form for the California Organ and Tissue Donor Registry that requires an applicant to mark his or her sex. This bill, on January 1, 2019, would require an applicant for an original driver's license or renewal of a driver's license to choose a gender category of female, male, or nonbinary, as specified, and would require the department to adopt regulations to provide a process for an amendment to a gender category under these provisions. The bill would also require the enrollment form for the California Organ and Tissue Donor Registry to instead require an applicant to mark his or her gender. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations in support of its provisions. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/15/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 15, 2017
- Enrolled 09/18/17 - Enrolled pdf September 18, 2017
- Amended 09/05/17 - Amended Assembly pdf September 05, 2017
- Amended 06/29/17 - Amended Assembly pdf June 29, 2017
- Amended 06/22/17 - Amended Assembly pdf June 22, 2017
- Amended 05/26/17 - Amended Senate pdf May 26, 2017
- Amended 04/17/17 - Amended Senate pdf April 17, 2017
- Amended 03/27/17 - Amended Senate pdf March 27, 2017
- Introduced 01/24/17 - Introduced pdf January 24, 2017
- SB179 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 853, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 2923.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 57. Noes 21. Page 3261.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (September 1).
-
August 23 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (July 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 27).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and TRANS.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 1314.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Published May 26 at 10 a.m.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1179.) (May 25).
-
Set for hearing May 25.
-
May 15 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 15.
-
May 8 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing May 8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 851.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing April 25.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 1. Page 627.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Set for hearing April 4.
-
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 24.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Atkins · Primary
- De León · Cosponsor
- Mitchell · Cosponsor
- Bocanegra · Cosponsor
- Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry · Cosponsor
- Bloom · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Cosponsor
- Eggman · Cosponsor
- Friedman · Cosponsor
- Galgiani · Cosponsor
- Gloria · Cosponsor
- Ash Kalra · Cosponsor
- Lara · Cosponsor
- Low · Cosponsor
- Medina · Cosponsor
- Monning · Cosponsor
- O'Donnell · Cosponsor
- Skinner · Cosponsor
- Ting · Cosponsor
- Scott D. Wiener · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Cosponsor
- Cristina Garcia · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 21 co-sponsors · 100 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Atkins
Co-sponsors (21)
- De León
- Mitchell
- Bocanegra
- Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic
- Bloom
- Chiu
- Eggman
- Friedman
- Galgiani
- Gloria
- Kalra, Ash Democratic
- Lara
- Low
- Medina
- Monning
- O'Donnell
- Skinner
- Ting
- Wiener, Scott D. Democratic
- Mark Stone Voted No
- Cristina Garcia
Not signed on (100)
100 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 100 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 30% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 42 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 27% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 29% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 21% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 9% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 30% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 8% | 0% | 23% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 179 do?
- (1) Existing law authorizes a person who was born in this state and who has undergone clinically appropriate treatment for the purpose of gender transition to obtain a new birth certificate from the State Registrar. This bill would enact the Gender Recognition Act. For purposes of obtaining a new birth certificate under the provisions above, the bill would delete the requirement that an applicant have undergone any treatment, and instead would authorize a person to submit to the State Registrar an application to change gender on the birth certificate and an affidavit attesting, under penalty of perjury, that the request for a change of gender is to conform the person's legal gender to the person's gender identity and not for any fraudulent purpose. By requiring the affidavit to be attested to under penalty of perjury, the bill would create a crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the change of gender on a new birth certificate to be female, male, or nonbinary. (2) Existing law authorizes a person who has undergone clinically appropriate treatment for the purpose of gender transition to petition for a court judgment recognizing the change of gender, and to petition for a court order conforming the person's name to the person's gender identity. Existing law provides specific procedures to seek these orders and judgments, either separately or in combination. This bill, commencing on September 1, 2018, would delete the requirement that a person have undergone any treatment to seek a court judgment to recognize a change of gender and instead would authorize the petitioner to attest, under penalty of perjury, that the request is to conform the person's legal gender to the person's gender identity and not for any fraudulent purpose. By requiring the affidavit to be attested to under penalty of perjury, the bill would create a crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize a change of gender in the court judgment to female, male, or nonbinary. The bill would provide modified procedures to obtain a court order for a change of name to conform to the petitioner's gender identity and a court judgment to recognize a change in the petitioner's gender. The bill would provide a separate procedure for a person under 18 years of age to petition for a court judgment to recognize a change of gender to female, male, or nonbinary. (3) Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue a driver's license to an applicant when the department determines that the applicant is lawfully entitled to a license, and requires the license to contain, among other things, a brief description and engraved picture or photograph of the licensee for the purpose of identification. Existing law requires the application for an original driver's license or renewal of a driver's license to contain specified information, as provided by the applicant. Existing law also authorizes the department to issue identification cards and requires an identification card to adequately describe the applicant. Existing law requires the department, upon issuance of a new identification card or renewal of an identification card, to provide information regarding organ and tissue donation, including an enrollment form for the California Organ and Tissue Donor Registry that requires an applicant to mark his or her sex. This bill, on January 1, 2019, would require an applicant for an original driver's license or renewal of a driver's license to choose a gender category of female, male, or nonbinary, as specified, and would require the department to adopt regulations to provide a process for an amendment to a gender category under these provisions. The bill would also require the enrollment form for the California Organ and Tissue Donor Registry to instead require an applicant to mark his or her gender. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations in support of its provisions. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 179?
- SB 179 is sponsored by Atkins, De León, Mitchell, Bocanegra, Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (Democratic), Bloom, Chiu, Eggman, Friedman, Galgiani, Gloria, Kalra, Ash (Democratic), Lara, Low, Medina, Monning, O'Donnell, Skinner, Ting, Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic), Mark Stone, and Cristina Garcia.
- What is the current status of SB 179?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 24, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 179?
- Track SB 179 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 179
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 179
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →