California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: To Executive 2 D cosponsors

SB 905 — Alcoholic beverages: hours of sale.

Last action — In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that any on- or off-sale licensee, or agent or employee of the licensee, who sells, gives, or delivers to any person any alcoholic beverage between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. of the same day, and any person who knowingly purchases any alcoholic beverages between those hours, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law provides for moneys collected as fees pursuant to the act to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund, with those moneys generally allocated to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill, beginning January 1, 2021, and before January 2, 2026, would require the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to conduct a pilot program that would authorize the department to issue an additional hours license to an on-sale licensee located in a qualified city which would authorize, with or without conditions, the selling, giving, or purchasing of alcoholic beverages at the licensed premises between the hours of 2 a.m. and 4 a.m., upon completion of specified requirements by the qualified city in which the licensee is located. The bill would impose specified fees related to the license to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund. The bill would require the applicant to notify specified persons of the application for an additional hours license and would provide a procedure for protest and hearing regarding the application. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol and each qualified city that has elected to participate in the program to submit reports to the Legislature and specified committees regarding the regional impact of the additional hours licenses, as specified. The bill would provide that any person under 21 years of age who enters and remains in the licensed public premises during the additional serving hours without lawful business therein is guilty of a misdemeanor, as provided. The pilot program would apply to Cathedral City, Coachella, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Palm Springs, Sacramento, San Francisco, and West Hollywood. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the qualified cities.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  2. Vetoed by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 8. Page 6051.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 22. Page 6773.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 16).

  12. August 8 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (June 28).

  16. June 20 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  17. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  18. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  19. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 4398.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  22. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4299.) (May 25).

  23. Set for hearing May 25.

  24. April 16 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  25. Set for hearing April 16.

  26. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 4366.) (March 13).

  28. Set for hearing March 13.

  29. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  30. From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 17.

  31. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (7)

Not signed on (114)

114 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 114 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB905 Wiener et al. Concurrence

Passed 28 Yea · 8 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26702
Democratic 2102
Total 28804
% of votes cast 70%20%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Cannella — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Chang — Nay
Glazer — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bates — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Delgado — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Portantino — Yea
De León — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Not Voting
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Not Voting
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

SB 905 Wiener Senate Third Reading By SANTIAGO

Passed 51 Yea · 22 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 411304
Democratic 9502
Republican 1401
Total 512207
% of votes cast 64%28%0%9%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Nay
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Obernolte — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Fong — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Gray — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Frazier — Nay
Harper — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Nay
Burke — Yea
Salas — Nay
Holden — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Levine — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
McCarty — Nay
Nazarian — Nay
Baker — Nay
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Nay
Cooper — Not Voting
O'Donnell — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Not Voting
Steinorth — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Cunningham — Yea
Daly — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Not Voting
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Nay
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Not Voting
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Nay
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Not Voting
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Nay
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9004
Democratic 3000
Republican 0001
Total 12005
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Nazarian — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Chau — Yea
Fong — Not Voting
Obernolte — Not Voting
Eggman — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

Passed 11 Yea · 6 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7404
Democratic 4000
Republican 0200
Total 11604
% of votes cast 52%29%0%19%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Daly — Not Voting
Cooley — Nay
Gray — Yea
Cooper — Not Voting
Rubio — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Salas — Not Voting
Kiley — Yea
Levine — Nay
Low — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading SB905 Wiener et al.

Passed 27 Yea · 9 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 25801
Democratic 2102
Total 27903
% of votes cast 69%23%0%8%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Bates — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Nay
Leyva — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Pan — Yea
Monning — Yea
Allen — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hill — Yea
Dodd — Yea
De León — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Newman — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Not Voting
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Not Voting
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 905 do?
The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that any on- or off-sale licensee, or agent or employee of the licensee, who sells, gives, or delivers to any person any alcoholic beverage between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. of the same day, and any person who knowingly purchases any alcoholic beverages between those hours, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law provides for moneys collected as fees pursuant to the act to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund, with those moneys generally allocated to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon appropriation by the Legislature. This bill, beginning January 1, 2021, and before January 2, 2026, would require the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to conduct a pilot program that would authorize the department to issue an additional hours license to an on-sale licensee located in a qualified city which would authorize, with or without conditions, the selling, giving, or purchasing of alcoholic beverages at the licensed premises between the hours of 2 a.m. and 4 a.m., upon completion of specified requirements by the qualified city in which the licensee is located. The bill would impose specified fees related to the license to be deposited in the Alcohol Beverage Control Fund. The bill would require the applicant to notify specified persons of the application for an additional hours license and would provide a procedure for protest and hearing regarding the application. The bill would require the Department of the California Highway Patrol and each qualified city that has elected to participate in the program to submit reports to the Legislature and specified committees regarding the regional impact of the additional hours licenses, as specified. The bill would provide that any person under 21 years of age who enters and remains in the licensed public premises during the additional serving hours without lawful business therein is guilty of a misdemeanor, as provided. The pilot program would apply to Cathedral City, Coachella, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Palm Springs, Sacramento, San Francisco, and West Hollywood. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the qualified cities.
Who sponsors SB 905?
SB 905 is sponsored by Jones-Sawyer, Lara, Obernolte, Rendon, Santiago, Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic), Allen, Benjamin (Democratic), and Wendy Carrillo.
What is the current status of SB 905?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 905?
Track SB 905 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 905

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 905

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →