Compensation: gratuities.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1099 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1099.
You're tracking AB 1099
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1099 — Compensation: gratuities.
Last action — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law prohibits an employer or agent, as defined, from collecting, taking, or receiving any gratuity or a part thereof that is paid, given to, or left for an employee, as defined, by a patron, or deducting any amount from wages due an employee on account of a gratuity, or requiring an employee to credit the amount, or any part thereof, of a gratuity against and as a part of the wages due the employee from the employer. Existing law declares a gratuity the sole property of the employee or employees to whom it was paid, given, or left for. Existing law requires an employer that permits patrons to pay gratuities by credit card to pay the employees the full amount of the gratuity that the patron indicated on the credit card slip, without any deductions for any credit card payment processing fees or costs that may be charged to the employer by the credit card company. Existing law requires an employer to keep accurate records of all gratuities received by the employer and requires that these records be open to inspection at all reasonable hours by the Department of Industrial Relations. Existing law requires the department to enforce these provisions, and an employer who violates these provisions is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would also require an entity, as defined, that permits a patron to pay for services performed by a worker by debit or credit card to also accept a debit or credit card for payment of gratuity. The bill would require payment of a gratuity made by a patron using a debit or credit card to be made to the worker not later than the next regular payday following the date the patron authorized the debit or credit card payment. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/30/17 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 30, 2017
- Amended 04/05/17 - Amended Assembly pdf April 05, 2017
- Introduced 02/17/17 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2017
- AB1099 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 25. Page 1989.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 1776.)
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 26).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gonzalez Fletcher · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gonzalez Fletcher
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 19 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 46 | 25 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 31% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Nay |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Nay |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 29% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1099 do?
- Existing law prohibits an employer or agent, as defined, from collecting, taking, or receiving any gratuity or a part thereof that is paid, given to, or left for an employee, as defined, by a patron, or deducting any amount from wages due an employee on account of a gratuity, or requiring an employee to credit the amount, or any part thereof, of a gratuity against and as a part of the wages due the employee from the employer. Existing law declares a gratuity the sole property of the employee or employees to whom it was paid, given, or left for. Existing law requires an employer that permits patrons to pay gratuities by credit card to pay the employees the full amount of the gratuity that the patron indicated on the credit card slip, without any deductions for any credit card payment processing fees or costs that may be charged to the employer by the credit card company. Existing law requires an employer to keep accurate records of all gratuities received by the employer and requires that these records be open to inspection at all reasonable hours by the Department of Industrial Relations. Existing law requires the department to enforce these provisions, and an employer who violates these provisions is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would also require an entity, as defined, that permits a patron to pay for services performed by a worker by debit or credit card to also accept a debit or credit card for payment of gratuity. The bill would require payment of a gratuity made by a patron using a debit or credit card to be made to the worker not later than the next regular payday following the date the patron authorized the debit or credit card payment. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1099?
- AB 1099 is sponsored by Gonzalez Fletcher.
- What is the current status of AB 1099?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1099?
- Track AB 1099 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1099
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1099
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →