California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 D cosponsors

AB 2908 — Tire recycling: California tire regulatory fee and waste tire program.

Last action — Vetoed by Governor.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) The California Tire Recycling Act requires, until January 1, 2024, a person who purchases a new tire to pay a California tire fee of $1.75 per tire, for deposit in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund, for expenditure by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery upon appropriation by the Legislature, to fund the waste tire program and for other purposes, including to pay for the costs associated with a waste tire and used tire hauler program and manifest system, as provided. After January 1, 2024, existing law reduces the tire fee to $0.75 per tire. Existing law requires any person generating waste tires or used tires that are transported or submitted for transportation, for offsite handling, altering, storage, disposal, or for any combination thereof, to complete a California Uniform Waste and Used Tire Manifest, as required by the department. Existing law requires a generator to provide the manifest to the waste and used tire hauler at the time of transfer of the tires, and to submit to the department, on a quarterly schedule, a legible copy of each manifest. This bill would require, until January 1, 2024, upon a specified finding by the department, a waste tire generator that is a retail seller of new tires to end user purchasers to pay a California tire regulatory fee and to remit that fee to the state on a quarterly schedule for deposit in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund. The bill would require the department to track revenue from the California tire regulatory fee separately and would prohibit those funds from being used for activities other than those specified. The bill would require the department to identify the specific programs that the California tire regulatory fee would fund. The bill would require the department to establish the California tire regulatory fee in an amount that does not exceed $1 per new tire sold, and would require the department to base the amount of the fee on specified criteria, as provided. The bill would authorize the department to differentiate in setting the fees between the waste tire generators who are retail sellers depending upon the nature of the activity generating waste tires, the number of waste tires generated, and other appropriate bases. The bill would require the department, prior to establishing the California tire regulatory fee or making any adjustment to the fee, to hold a public hearing, as specified. The bill would provide that an adjustment to the fee becomes effective on January 1 of the year following its adoption. The bill would require the department to adopt regulations to implement the initial California tire regulatory fee, and would authorize the department to adopt regulations to adjust the California tire regulatory fee, as specified. (2) Existing law prohibits the California tire fee from being imposed on a tire sold with, or sold separately for use on, a self-propelled wheelchair, a motorized tricycle or motorized quadricycle, or a vehicle that is similar to a motorized tricycle or motorized quadricycle, as specified. This bill would prohibit the California tire regulatory fee from being imposed on those same vehicles. (3) Existing law establishes, as a part of the waste tire program, the tire recycling program, which promotes and develops alternatives to the landfill disposal of used whole tires. The program provides for grants to certain entities involved in activities that result in reduced landfill disposal of whole used tires, and development and implementation of a waste tire incentive payment program to promote increased demand for waste tires recycled in this state. Under the act, until June 30, 2019, the Rubberized Pavement Market Development Act provides for the award of grants to certain public agency projects that use rubberized asphalt concrete. This bill would extend the operation of the Rubberized Pavement Market Development Act to January 1, 2020, and would enact the Tire Recycling Incentive Program Act. The bill would require the department to establish this incentive program to make payments to eligible entities that purchase tire products that are processed in the state from waste tire material for incorporation in products for sale to end users or for use in local public works projects, as specified. The bill would include as an eligible entity a city, county, city and county, or special district that uses rubberized asphalt products that incorporate California-generated waste tire material for a local public works pavement project, as provided. The bill would require that no less than 50% of the total annual value of incentive payments be made available to those local entities. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2020, to hold a public workshop to develop a plan for the tire recycling incentive payment program, as specified. The bill would require the department to collect data from recipients of incentive payments and release that data annually in the California Waste Tire Market Report, as specified. The bill would require the department to evaluate the program in a public forum and propose changes accordingly. The bill would require the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to annually make available an allocation for incentive payments that is not less than 75% of the projected California tire fee revenue for that fiscal year at the time of the enactment of the annual Budget Act. The bill would authorize the department to reduce that allocation before the end of the fiscal year, if the department finds that actual California tire fee revenue falls short of projections. (4) Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to reduce the landfill disposal and stockpiling of used whole tires by 25% within 4 years of full implementation of a statewide tire recycling program and to recycle and reclaim used tires and used tire components to the greatest extent possible in order to recover valuable natural resources. This bill would declare that it is the policy goal of the state that not less than 75% of solid waste tires generated be source reduced or recycled in the state annually. The bill would require the department, if that policy goal is met for 3 consecutive years, to review existing tire recycling programs and make recommendations, as specified. (5) Existing law requires a person generating waste or used tires that are transported or submitted for transportation to submit a California Uniform Waste and Used Tire Manifest, as defined, to the waste and used tire hauler and to submit copies of the manifest to the department. A waste and used tire hauler is required to possess that manifest while transporting waste or used tires, and the operator of a waste or used tire facility is required to submit a copy of the manifest to the department and the generator. Existing law requires the department to develop and implement a system for auditing manifests, including continuously conducting random sampling and matching of manifests. This bill would revise those provisions to, among other things, require a waste and used tire hauler, on and after January 1, 2020, to submit an electronic manifest, instead of a paper manifest, to the department within 7 days of the date of the pickup or delivery for each load of waste or used tires transported. (6) This measure would declare that its provisions are severable.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor.

  2. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  3. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 46. Noes 30. Page 6659.).

  4. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 5652.).

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).

  8. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  9. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 20).

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.

  14. Referred to Com. on EQ.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 28. Page 5562.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 25).

  19. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  20. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. Read second time and amended.

  23. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 9).

  24. Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Atkins · Cosponsor
  • Marc Berman · Primary
  • Frazier · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 14 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Atkins
  • Frazier

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 46 Yea · 30 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 342103
Democratic 12301
Republican 0600
Total 463004
% of votes cast 58%38%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Nay
Baker — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Kamlager-Dove — Not Voting
Melendez — Nay
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Burke — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Mayes — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wood — Yea
Harper — Nay
Gray — Nay
Kiley — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Steinorth — Nay
Rubio — Not Voting
Bigelow — Nay
Cooper — Not Voting
Voepel — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Fong — Nay
Salas — Nay
Cunningham — Nay
Daly — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Nay
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 13 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201203
Democratic 4100
Total 241303
% of votes cast 60%33%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Lara — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Chang — Nay
Dodd — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Hill — Yea
De León — Yea
Allen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Roth — Not Voting
Wilk — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Delgado — Not Voting
Bradford — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Portantino — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 45 Yea · 28 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 10302
Unaffiliated 351903
Republican 0600
Total 452805
% of votes cast 58%36%0%6%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Kiley — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Low — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Harper — Nay
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Burke — Yea
Fong — Nay
Salas — Nay
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mayes — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Rubio — Not Voting
Gray — Not Voting
Acosta — Nay
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Not Voting
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Baker — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Brough — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Voepel — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cunningham — Nay
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Not Voting
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Nay
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Nay
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Nay
Choi, Steven S. Republican Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Flora, Heath Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 4 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9301
Democratic 3000
Republican 0100
Total 12401
% of votes cast 71%24%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Not Voting
Obernolte — Nay
Friedman — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Fong — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Chau — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2908 do?
(1) The California Tire Recycling Act requires, until January 1, 2024, a person who purchases a new tire to pay a California tire fee of $1.75 per tire, for deposit in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund, for expenditure by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery upon appropriation by the Legislature, to fund the waste tire program and for other purposes, including to pay for the costs associated with a waste tire and used tire hauler program and manifest system, as provided. After January 1, 2024, existing law reduces the tire fee to $0.75 per tire. Existing law requires any person generating waste tires or used tires that are transported or submitted for transportation, for offsite handling, altering, storage, disposal, or for any combination thereof, to complete a California Uniform Waste and Used Tire Manifest, as required by the department. Existing law requires a generator to provide the manifest to the waste and used tire hauler at the time of transfer of the tires, and to submit to the department, on a quarterly schedule, a legible copy of each manifest. This bill would require, until January 1, 2024, upon a specified finding by the department, a waste tire generator that is a retail seller of new tires to end user purchasers to pay a California tire regulatory fee and to remit that fee to the state on a quarterly schedule for deposit in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund. The bill would require the department to track revenue from the California tire regulatory fee separately and would prohibit those funds from being used for activities other than those specified. The bill would require the department to identify the specific programs that the California tire regulatory fee would fund. The bill would require the department to establish the California tire regulatory fee in an amount that does not exceed $1 per new tire sold, and would require the department to base the amount of the fee on specified criteria, as provided. The bill would authorize the department to differentiate in setting the fees between the waste tire generators who are retail sellers depending upon the nature of the activity generating waste tires, the number of waste tires generated, and other appropriate bases. The bill would require the department, prior to establishing the California tire regulatory fee or making any adjustment to the fee, to hold a public hearing, as specified. The bill would provide that an adjustment to the fee becomes effective on January 1 of the year following its adoption. The bill would require the department to adopt regulations to implement the initial California tire regulatory fee, and would authorize the department to adopt regulations to adjust the California tire regulatory fee, as specified. (2) Existing law prohibits the California tire fee from being imposed on a tire sold with, or sold separately for use on, a self-propelled wheelchair, a motorized tricycle or motorized quadricycle, or a vehicle that is similar to a motorized tricycle or motorized quadricycle, as specified. This bill would prohibit the California tire regulatory fee from being imposed on those same vehicles. (3) Existing law establishes, as a part of the waste tire program, the tire recycling program, which promotes and develops alternatives to the landfill disposal of used whole tires. The program provides for grants to certain entities involved in activities that result in reduced landfill disposal of whole used tires, and development and implementation of a waste tire incentive payment program to promote increased demand for waste tires recycled in this state. Under the act, until June 30, 2019, the Rubberized Pavement Market Development Act provides for the award of grants to certain public agency projects that use rubberized asphalt concrete. This bill would extend the operation of the Rubberized Pavement Market Development Act to January 1, 2020, and would enact the Tire Recycling Incentive Program Act. The bill would require the department to establish this incentive program to make payments to eligible entities that purchase tire products that are processed in the state from waste tire material for incorporation in products for sale to end users or for use in local public works projects, as specified. The bill would include as an eligible entity a city, county, city and county, or special district that uses rubberized asphalt products that incorporate California-generated waste tire material for a local public works pavement project, as provided. The bill would require that no less than 50% of the total annual value of incentive payments be made available to those local entities. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2020, to hold a public workshop to develop a plan for the tire recycling incentive payment program, as specified. The bill would require the department to collect data from recipients of incentive payments and release that data annually in the California Waste Tire Market Report, as specified. The bill would require the department to evaluate the program in a public forum and propose changes accordingly. The bill would require the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to annually make available an allocation for incentive payments that is not less than 75% of the projected California tire fee revenue for that fiscal year at the time of the enactment of the annual Budget Act. The bill would authorize the department to reduce that allocation before the end of the fiscal year, if the department finds that actual California tire fee revenue falls short of projections. (4) Existing law declares the intent of the Legislature to reduce the landfill disposal and stockpiling of used whole tires by 25% within 4 years of full implementation of a statewide tire recycling program and to recycle and reclaim used tires and used tire components to the greatest extent possible in order to recover valuable natural resources. This bill would declare that it is the policy goal of the state that not less than 75% of solid waste tires generated be source reduced or recycled in the state annually. The bill would require the department, if that policy goal is met for 3 consecutive years, to review existing tire recycling programs and make recommendations, as specified. (5) Existing law requires a person generating waste or used tires that are transported or submitted for transportation to submit a California Uniform Waste and Used Tire Manifest, as defined, to the waste and used tire hauler and to submit copies of the manifest to the department. A waste and used tire hauler is required to possess that manifest while transporting waste or used tires, and the operator of a waste or used tire facility is required to submit a copy of the manifest to the department and the generator. Existing law requires the department to develop and implement a system for auditing manifests, including continuously conducting random sampling and matching of manifests. This bill would revise those provisions to, among other things, require a waste and used tire hauler, on and after January 1, 2020, to submit an electronic manifest, instead of a paper manifest, to the department within 7 days of the date of the pickup or delivery for each load of waste or used tires transported. (6) This measure would declare that its provisions are severable.
Who sponsors AB 2908?
AB 2908 is sponsored by Atkins, Berman, Marc (Democratic), and Frazier.
What is the current status of AB 2908?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2908?
Track AB 2908 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2908

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2908

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →