Recycling: beverage containers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 168 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 168.
You're tracking SB 168
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 168 — Recycling: beverage containers.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, requires every beverage container sold or offered for sale in this state to have a minimum refund value. Under existing law, a beverage distributor is required to pay a redemption payment to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery for every beverage container sold or offered for sale in the state to a dealer, and the department is required to deposit those amounts in the continuously appropriated California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. Existing law requires each glass container manufacturer to use a minimum percentage of 35% of postfilled glass in the manufacturing of its glass food, drink, or beverage containers. Existing law provides that a violation of the act or a regulation adopted pursuant to the act is a crime. This bill would require, commencing January 1, 2020, a beverage container that is a PET plastic container to be constructed with a minimum of 20% postconsumer recycled plastic. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2021, to establish minimum postconsumer recycled content standards for beverage containers that are constructed of plastic, material other than metal, glass, or plastic, or any combination of plastic and material other than metal, glass, or plastic. The bill would authorize the department to adjust the minimum content standards, as specified, but not more frequently than annually. The bill would require a beverage manufacturer to certify with the department, under penalty of perjury, that it is in compliance with the minimum content standards and would provide that failure of a beverage manufacturer to meet the minimum content standards constitutes a separate violation per day. The bill would require a beverage manufacturer to report to the department for each month the amount of beverage containers subject to the minimum content standards sold in California by the beverage manufacturer and the amount of postconsumer recycled content used in the manufacturing of those containers. By expanding the crime of perjury and creating new crimes relating to the regulation of beverage containers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2020, to evaluate other beverage container redemption programs and to provide to the Legislature a report on aspects of those programs that may be incorporated into California's beverage container redemption program, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/27/18 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 27, 2018
- Amended 08/24/18 - Amended Assembly pdf August 24, 2018
- Amended 08/20/18 - Amended Assembly pdf August 20, 2018
- Amended 08/06/18 - Amended Assembly pdf August 06, 2018
- Amended 07/05/18 - Amended Assembly pdf July 05, 2018
- Amended 07/02/18 - Amended Assembly pdf July 02, 2018
- Amended 06/19/18 - Amended Assembly pdf June 19, 2018
- Amended 05/24/18 - Amended Assembly pdf May 24, 2018
- Amended 01/18/18 - Amended Senate pdf January 18, 2018
- Amended 04/06/17 - Amended Senate pdf April 06, 2017
- Amended 02/28/17 - Amended Senate pdf February 28, 2017
- Introduced 01/23/17 - Introduced pdf January 23, 2017
- SB168 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
Read third time. Refused passage.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (August 28).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Ayes 43. Noes 22. Page 6545.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 16).
-
Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.
-
August 15 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
August 8 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 25).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 6. Page 4112.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Ordered to second reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator Wieckowski.
-
Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1394.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Wieckowski.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 14. Noes 17. Page 1394.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1178.) (May 25).
-
Set for hearing May 25.
-
May 15 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 15.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 783.) (April 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
Set for hearing April 19.
-
Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wieckowski · Primary
- Mark Stone · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 16 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wieckowski
Co-sponsors (1)
- Mark Stone Voted No
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 22 | 0 | 15 |
| Democratic | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 29 | 30 | 0 | 21 |
| % of votes cast | 36% | 38% | 0% | 26% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Not Voting |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Rubio | — | Not Voting |
| Rivas | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Nay |
| Gloria | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Nay |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Nay |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 20% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 17 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 43 | 22 | 0 | 15 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 28% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Rivas | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 0% | 0% | 30% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 15 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 14 | 17 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 35% | 43% | 0% | 23% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Atkins | — | Not Voting |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 168 do?
- Existing law, the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, requires every beverage container sold or offered for sale in this state to have a minimum refund value. Under existing law, a beverage distributor is required to pay a redemption payment to the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery for every beverage container sold or offered for sale in the state to a dealer, and the department is required to deposit those amounts in the continuously appropriated California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. Existing law requires each glass container manufacturer to use a minimum percentage of 35% of postfilled glass in the manufacturing of its glass food, drink, or beverage containers. Existing law provides that a violation of the act or a regulation adopted pursuant to the act is a crime. This bill would require, commencing January 1, 2020, a beverage container that is a PET plastic container to be constructed with a minimum of 20% postconsumer recycled plastic. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2021, to establish minimum postconsumer recycled content standards for beverage containers that are constructed of plastic, material other than metal, glass, or plastic, or any combination of plastic and material other than metal, glass, or plastic. The bill would authorize the department to adjust the minimum content standards, as specified, but not more frequently than annually. The bill would require a beverage manufacturer to certify with the department, under penalty of perjury, that it is in compliance with the minimum content standards and would provide that failure of a beverage manufacturer to meet the minimum content standards constitutes a separate violation per day. The bill would require a beverage manufacturer to report to the department for each month the amount of beverage containers subject to the minimum content standards sold in California by the beverage manufacturer and the amount of postconsumer recycled content used in the manufacturing of those containers. By expanding the crime of perjury and creating new crimes relating to the regulation of beverage containers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the department, on or before January 1, 2020, to evaluate other beverage container redemption programs and to provide to the Legislature a report on aspects of those programs that may be incorporated into California's beverage container redemption program, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 168?
- SB 168 is sponsored by Wieckowski and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of SB 168?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 168?
- Track SB 168 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 168
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 168
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →