California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly Bipartisan · 1 R · 1 D cosponsors

AB 171 — Airport districts: temporary negotiable notes.

Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Wilk.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The California Airport District Act provides for the formation, organization, and operation of airport districts and authorizes airport districts to issue temporary negotiable notes at not more than 8% interest and not exceeding $500,000 in total amount outstanding. Existing law relating to the maximum rate on notes issued by a local agency generally provides that the rate may not exceed 12% per year. The act requires that any note proposed to be issued pursuant to the act with a term longer than 5 years not be issued until after a public hearing is conducted with respect to the issuance and a resolution is adopted approving the issuance, as specified. The act also provides that these notes are general obligations of the district payable from revenues and taxes unless paid from other available funds of the district in the same manner as bonds of the district and that the maturity of the notes may not be later than 20 years from the date issued, and that the total aggregate amount of the notes outstanding at any one time may not exceed 2% of the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the district, or if the assessed valuation is not obtained, then 2% of the county auditor's estimate of the assessed valuation of the taxable property of the district evidenced by the auditor's certificate. This bill would delete these latter provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Wilk.

  2. Ordered to third reading.

  3. From Consent Calendar.

  4. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  5. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 19).

  6. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  7. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  8. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  9. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  10. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  11. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1486.)

  12. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  13. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 3).

  14. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. Referred to Com. on B. & P.

  16. From printer. May be heard in committee February 17.

  17. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 171 LACKEY Consent Calendar Second Day

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 56001
Democratic 16000
Republican 5002
Total 77003
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Harper — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Wood — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Salas — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Burke — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Low — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Chau — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass. To Consent Calendar.

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Democratic 5000
Republican 1000
Total 16001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Gray — Not Voting
Chau — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Democratic 3001
Republican 1000
Total 15001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (16)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Low — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Holden — Yea
Baker — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Not Voting
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 171 do?
The California Airport District Act provides for the formation, organization, and operation of airport districts and authorizes airport districts to issue temporary negotiable notes at not more than 8% interest and not exceeding $500,000 in total amount outstanding. Existing law relating to the maximum rate on notes issued by a local agency generally provides that the rate may not exceed 12% per year. The act requires that any note proposed to be issued pursuant to the act with a term longer than 5 years not be issued until after a public hearing is conducted with respect to the issuance and a resolution is adopted approving the issuance, as specified. The act also provides that these notes are general obligations of the district payable from revenues and taxes unless paid from other available funds of the district in the same manner as bonds of the district and that the maturity of the notes may not be later than 20 years from the date issued, and that the total aggregate amount of the notes outstanding at any one time may not exceed 2% of the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the district, or if the assessed valuation is not obtained, then 2% of the county auditor's estimate of the assessed valuation of the taxable property of the district evidenced by the auditor's certificate. This bill would delete these latter provisions.
Who sponsors AB 171?
AB 171 is sponsored by Lackey, Tom (Republican) and Fong, Mike (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 171?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 171?
Track AB 171 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 171

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 171

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →