California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: To Executive 2 D cosponsors

SB 275 — Alcohol and drug treatment: youth.

Last action — In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law consolidated within the State Department of Health Care Services all substance use disorder functions and programs from the former State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. The existing Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Treatment and Recovery Program Act of 1998, which authorized the State Department of Alcohol and Drug programs to establish community-based nonresidential and residential recovery programs to intervene and treat the problems of alcohol and other drug use among youth, became inoperative on July 1, 2013. This bill would repeal those inoperative provisions and would enact the Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Substance Use Disorder Treatment Act. The bill would require the department to convene an expert panel on or before January 1, 2020, to advise the department solely on the development of youth substance use disorder (SUD) treatment quality standards, as specified. The bill would require the department, on or before July 1, 2021, to adopt regulations to establish youth SUD treatment quality standards, as specified. The bill would require each county to designate a single public agency that is responsible for administering the provision of youth SUD treatment services within that county. The bill would require the agency to, among other things, ensure, in conjunction with the county office of education and other local education agencies, that all programs in the county providing youth SUD prevention and treatment services are providing coordinated services. By requiring additional duties of local governments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would additionally define youth SUD treatment services as including any publicly funded direct services intended to treat substance use disorders for individuals from birth to 26 years of age, inclusive. The bill would require a public agency or private entity that provides youth SUD treatment services after January 1, 2022, to comply with the standards adopted by the department and would limit which entities may provide youth SUD treatment services. The bill would, after July 1, 2022, require youth SUD treatment programs to be certified in accordance with the regulations adopted by the department. The bill would prohibit a county from contracting to provide youth SUD treatment services with an entity that does not comply with these provisions. The bill would require the department to report to the Legislature regarding the standards on or before January 1, 2023, and annually thereafter. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  2. Vetoed by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 6115.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. Ordered to special consent calendar.

  6. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 6069.)

  7. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 6028.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).

  9. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6760.) Ordered to the Senate.

  11. Ordered to third reading.

  12. Read third time and amended.

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 16).

  16. August 8 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  17. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 26).

  19. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  20. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  21. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

  23. June 28 hearing postponed by committee.

  24. Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and REV. & TAX.

  25. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  26. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1223.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  27. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  28. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.

  29. Set for hearing May 22.

  30. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1019.) (May 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  31. Set for hearing May 10.

  32. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 515.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  33. Set for hearing March 28.

  34. Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and GOV. & F.

  35. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 12.

  36. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Portantino

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34001
Democratic 5000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Lara — Yea
Delgado — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Chang — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Hill — Yea
De León — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 58000
Democratic 16000
Republican 6000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Harper — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Burke — Yea
Fong — Yea
Salas — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooper — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wood — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Chau — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9004
Democratic 3000
Republican 0001
Total 12005
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chau — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 3000
Unaffiliated 11000
Republican 1000
Total 15000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Waldron — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Burke — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Wood — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6002
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 8003
% of votes cast 73%0%0%27%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Mayes — Yea
Salas — Yea
Friedman — Not Voting
Cooley — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32003
Democratic 5000
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hernandez — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Pan — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Not Voting
Atkins — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Allen — Yea
De León — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Newman — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 275 do?
Existing law consolidated within the State Department of Health Care Services all substance use disorder functions and programs from the former State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. The existing Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Treatment and Recovery Program Act of 1998, which authorized the State Department of Alcohol and Drug programs to establish community-based nonresidential and residential recovery programs to intervene and treat the problems of alcohol and other drug use among youth, became inoperative on July 1, 2013. This bill would repeal those inoperative provisions and would enact the Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Substance Use Disorder Treatment Act. The bill would require the department to convene an expert panel on or before January 1, 2020, to advise the department solely on the development of youth substance use disorder (SUD) treatment quality standards, as specified. The bill would require the department, on or before July 1, 2021, to adopt regulations to establish youth SUD treatment quality standards, as specified. The bill would require each county to designate a single public agency that is responsible for administering the provision of youth SUD treatment services within that county. The bill would require the agency to, among other things, ensure, in conjunction with the county office of education and other local education agencies, that all programs in the county providing youth SUD prevention and treatment services are providing coordinated services. By requiring additional duties of local governments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would additionally define youth SUD treatment services as including any publicly funded direct services intended to treat substance use disorders for individuals from birth to 26 years of age, inclusive. The bill would require a public agency or private entity that provides youth SUD treatment services after January 1, 2022, to comply with the standards adopted by the department and would limit which entities may provide youth SUD treatment services. The bill would, after July 1, 2022, require youth SUD treatment programs to be certified in accordance with the regulations adopted by the department. The bill would prohibit a county from contracting to provide youth SUD treatment services with an entity that does not comply with these provisions. The bill would require the department to report to the Legislature regarding the standards on or before January 1, 2023, and annually thereafter. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors SB 275?
SB 275 is sponsored by Portantino, Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (Democratic), Bates, and McGuire, Mike (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 275?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 275?
Track SB 275 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 275

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 275

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →