AB 848 — Public contracts: University of California: California State University: domestic workers.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 844, Statutes of 2017.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires a state agency to comply with specified procedures in awarding agency contracts. Existing law, with specified exceptions, prohibits a state agency authorized to enter into contracts relating to public benefit programs from contracting for services provided by a call center that directly serves applicants for, recipients of, or enrollees in, those public benefit programs with a contractor or subcontractor unless that contractor or subcontractor certifies in its bid for the contract that the contract, and any subcontract performed under that contract, will be performed solely with workers employed in California. Existing law imposes a civil penalty, as provided, for knowingly providing false information in that certification. Existing law also requires the contract to include a clause providing for a right by the state to terminate the contract for noncompliance and specified penalties, if the contractor or subcontractor performs the contract or the subcontract with workers not employed in California during the life of the contract. This bill would prohibit, on or after July 1, 2017, the University of California and the California State University from contracting for services with a contractor or subcontractor unless that contractor or subcontractor certifies, under penalty of perjury, in his or her bid for that contract that the contract, and any subcontract performed under that contract, will be performed solely with workers within the United States or describes in his or her bid any parts of the work that will be performed by workers outside of the United States. The bill would prohibit the University of California and the California State University from expending funds for training for service contract employees located in foreign countries or for training for service contract employees who plan to relocate to a foreign country as part of the service contract, if that service contract displaces an employee of the University of California or the California State University. The bill would require a contract entered into pursuant to the bill to provide, in the event a contractor or subcontractor performs the contract or the subcontract with workers outside the United States during the life of the contract, for the termination of the contract for noncompliance, as specified. The bill would specify the circumstances under which a contractor or the University of California or the California State University would be found to have violated a provision of the bill. The bill would define "displace" for purposes of the bill as the layoff, demotion, involuntary transfer to a new classification or location, or time base reduction of an employee of the University of California or the California State University, under specified conditions. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions would preclude the University of California and the California State University from contracting with a contractor or subcontractor that utilizes workers in offshore operations in circumstances that do not directly result in the displacement of an employee of the University of California or the California State University. The bill would specify that these provisions do not apply to contracts relating to study abroad programs, or to international teaching, research, or public service activities and projects, conducted by the University of California or the California State University. By requiring contractors and subcontractors to make certifications under penalty of perjury, this bill would create a new crime and thereby impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/15/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 15, 2017
- Enrolled 09/15/17 - Enrolled pdf September 15, 2017
- Amended 09/08/17 - Amended Senate pdf September 08, 2017
- Amended 09/01/17 - Amended Senate pdf September 01, 2017
- Amended 07/12/17 - Amended Senate pdf July 12, 2017
- Amended 06/26/17 - Amended Senate pdf June 26, 2017
- Amended 04/19/17 - Amended Assembly pdf April 19, 2017
- Amended 04/05/17 - Amended Assembly pdf April 05, 2017
- Introduced 02/16/17 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2017
- AB848 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 844, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 19. Page 3316.).
-
Assembly Rule 77(a) suspended. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 3255.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 15 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 6. Page 2782.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (September 1).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 5).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 18. Page 1778.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 3.) (May 10).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and A. & A.R.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Lara · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Primary
- Scott D. Wiener · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- McCarty
Co-sponsors (3)
- Lara
- Wiener, Scott D. Democratic
- Mark Stone
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 19 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 24% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 42 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 59 | 18 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 23% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Not Voting |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 18% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 848 do?
- (1) Existing law requires a state agency to comply with specified procedures in awarding agency contracts. Existing law, with specified exceptions, prohibits a state agency authorized to enter into contracts relating to public benefit programs from contracting for services provided by a call center that directly serves applicants for, recipients of, or enrollees in, those public benefit programs with a contractor or subcontractor unless that contractor or subcontractor certifies in its bid for the contract that the contract, and any subcontract performed under that contract, will be performed solely with workers employed in California. Existing law imposes a civil penalty, as provided, for knowingly providing false information in that certification. Existing law also requires the contract to include a clause providing for a right by the state to terminate the contract for noncompliance and specified penalties, if the contractor or subcontractor performs the contract or the subcontract with workers not employed in California during the life of the contract. This bill would prohibit, on or after July 1, 2017, the University of California and the California State University from contracting for services with a contractor or subcontractor unless that contractor or subcontractor certifies, under penalty of perjury, in his or her bid for that contract that the contract, and any subcontract performed under that contract, will be performed solely with workers within the United States or describes in his or her bid any parts of the work that will be performed by workers outside of the United States. The bill would prohibit the University of California and the California State University from expending funds for training for service contract employees located in foreign countries or for training for service contract employees who plan to relocate to a foreign country as part of the service contract, if that service contract displaces an employee of the University of California or the California State University. The bill would require a contract entered into pursuant to the bill to provide, in the event a contractor or subcontractor performs the contract or the subcontract with workers outside the United States during the life of the contract, for the termination of the contract for noncompliance, as specified. The bill would specify the circumstances under which a contractor or the University of California or the California State University would be found to have violated a provision of the bill. The bill would define "displace" for purposes of the bill as the layoff, demotion, involuntary transfer to a new classification or location, or time base reduction of an employee of the University of California or the California State University, under specified conditions. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions would preclude the University of California and the California State University from contracting with a contractor or subcontractor that utilizes workers in offshore operations in circumstances that do not directly result in the displacement of an employee of the University of California or the California State University. The bill would specify that these provisions do not apply to contracts relating to study abroad programs, or to international teaching, research, or public service activities and projects, conducted by the University of California or the California State University. By requiring contractors and subcontractors to make certifications under penalty of perjury, this bill would create a new crime and thereby impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 848?
- AB 848 is sponsored by Lara, McCarty, Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic), and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of AB 848?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 848?
- Track AB 848 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 848
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 848
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →