California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2322 — Department of Motor Vehicles: records: confidentiality.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 914, Statutes of 2018.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home addresses of certain public employees and officials, including judges and court commissioners, that appear in records of the Department of Motor Vehicles upon the request of the employee or official, except to a court, a law enforcement agency, an attorney in a civil or criminal action under certain circumstances, and certain other official entities. Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home addresses of the public employees and officials described above for a period of 3 years following termination of office or employment, except as specified. Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home address of a retired peace officer permanently upon his or her request for confidentiality. Existing law also prohibits the disclosure of the home address of the surviving spouse or child of a peace officer for 3 years following the death of the peace officer if he or she died in the line of duty. This bill would clarify that the above-described provisions apply to active or retired judges and court commissioners, and would expand those protections to the surviving spouse or child of a judge or court commissioner, if the judge or court commissioner died in the performance of his or her duties. The bill would also prohibit the disclosure of the home address of a retired judge or court commissioner permanently upon his or her request for confidentiality, and would prohibit the disclosure of the home address of the surviving spouse or child of a judge or court commissioner who died in the performance of his or her duties for 3 years following his or her death. The bill would make conforming changes to those provisions. If the disclosure of the confidential home address of a peace officer, a nonsworn employee of the city police department or county sheriff's office, or the spouses or children of these persons in violation of these provisions results in bodily injury to those persons, existing law makes that violation a felony. This bill would make a violation of these provisions with respect to a judge or court commissioner, or the spouses or children of these persons, a felony, thereby expanding the scope of an existing crime, and imposing a state-mandated local program. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 914, Statutes of 2018.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6370.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 16 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 5271.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From Consent Calendar.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  12. From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.

  13. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 68. Noes 0. Page 4645.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  18. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 4).

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (March 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

  22. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  23. From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.

  24. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Daly · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Daly

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 58000
Democratic 16000
Republican 6000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Burke — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Fong — Yea
Salas — Yea
Holden — Yea
Gray — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Levine — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Low — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chau — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Harper — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31004
Democratic 5000
Total 36004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Chang — Yea
Hill — Yea
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Delgado — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Allen — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 68 Yea · 0 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 48008
Democratic 14001
Republican 6000
Total 68009
% of votes cast 88%0%0%12%
How each member voted (77)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Not Voting
Brough — Yea
Harper — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Not Voting
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Not Voting
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Chu — Yea
Burke — Yea
Chau — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Holden — Yea
Fong — Yea
Salas — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Ting — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Wood — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gray — Not Voting
Low — Not Voting
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Mullin — Not Voting
O'Donnell — Yea
Steinorth — Not Voting
Waldron — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Not Voting
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11002
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 15002
% of votes cast 88%0%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Obernolte — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Chau — Yea
Nazarian — Not Voting
Fong — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2001
Unaffiliated 11000
Total 13001
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Mathis — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Harper — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Chu — Yea
Fong — Yea
Daly — Yea
Baker — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Not Voting
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2322 do?
Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home addresses of certain public employees and officials, including judges and court commissioners, that appear in records of the Department of Motor Vehicles upon the request of the employee or official, except to a court, a law enforcement agency, an attorney in a civil or criminal action under certain circumstances, and certain other official entities. Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home addresses of the public employees and officials described above for a period of 3 years following termination of office or employment, except as specified. Existing law prohibits the disclosure of the home address of a retired peace officer permanently upon his or her request for confidentiality. Existing law also prohibits the disclosure of the home address of the surviving spouse or child of a peace officer for 3 years following the death of the peace officer if he or she died in the line of duty. This bill would clarify that the above-described provisions apply to active or retired judges and court commissioners, and would expand those protections to the surviving spouse or child of a judge or court commissioner, if the judge or court commissioner died in the performance of his or her duties. The bill would also prohibit the disclosure of the home address of a retired judge or court commissioner permanently upon his or her request for confidentiality, and would prohibit the disclosure of the home address of the surviving spouse or child of a judge or court commissioner who died in the performance of his or her duties for 3 years following his or her death. The bill would make conforming changes to those provisions. If the disclosure of the confidential home address of a peace officer, a nonsworn employee of the city police department or county sheriff's office, or the spouses or children of these persons in violation of these provisions results in bodily injury to those persons, existing law makes that violation a felony. This bill would make a violation of these provisions with respect to a judge or court commissioner, or the spouses or children of these persons, a felony, thereby expanding the scope of an existing crime, and imposing a state-mandated local program. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2322?
AB 2322 is sponsored by Daly.
What is the current status of AB 2322?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2322?
Track AB 2322 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2322

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2322

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →