Hazardous materials: unified program agency: integrated alerting and notification system.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1646 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1646.
You're tracking AB 1646
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1646 — Hazardous materials: unified program agency: integrated alerting and notification system.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 588, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law requires the Secretary for Environmental Protection to implement a unified hazardous waste and hazardous materials management regulatory program. Existing law requires every county to apply to the secretary to be certified to implement the unified program and allows a city or local agency to implement the unified program as a unified program agency, or UPA. Existing law also requires each certified UPA to institute a single fee system, which is required to include a surcharge on each person regulated by the unified program, the amount of which is determined by the secretary annually, to cover the necessary and reasonable costs of the state agencies in carrying out their responsibilities in the unified hazardous waste and hazardous materials management regulatory program. Existing law imposes certain requirements on stationary sources handling regulated substances, as defined, including, among other things, the preparation and implementation of a risk management plan. Existing law requires the UPA to review the plan and to notify the stationary source of any defects in the plan. This bill would require each local implementing agency, as defined, to develop an integrated alerting and notification system, in coordination with local emergency management agencies, UPAs, local first response agencies, petroleum refineries, and the public, to be used to notify the community surrounding a petroleum refinery in the event of an incident at the refinery warranting the use of the notification system. The bill would require the notification system to be configured, as specified, and used to alert and notify the communities surrounding a petroleum refinery, including schools, public facilities, hospitals, transient and special needs populations, as defined, and residential care homes. If an integrated alerting and notification system has not been developed and implemented by January 1, 2018, the bill would require the local implementing agency to determine an appropriate notification system to be developed consistent with these provisions and, on or before January 1, 2019, to develop a schedule for developing and implementing the notification system. The bill would require a UPA to ensure that the notification system developed is consistent with the UPA's area plan and specified regulations regarding the California Accidental Release Prevention Program. The bill would require a petroleum refinery to immediately call the emergency 9-1-1 telephone number and notify the UPA, in the event of an incident warranting the use of the notification system. The bill would require a UPA, in coordination with the local implementing agency, to establish a fee, separate from the single fee system described above, that a petroleum refinery would be required to pay in an amount to cover the reasonable and necessary costs for the design, building, and installation of the notification system, and a fee, as part of the single fee system levied on a petroleum refinery, in an amount sufficient to cover the reasonable and necessary costs for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the notification system. The bill would require the Governor's Office of Emergency Services to work with the local implementing agencies and the UPAs to develop a model memorandum of understanding between adjacent jurisdictions for integration of alerting and notification systems that will operate across jurisdictional boundaries. The bill would require the local implementing agency to ensure that there are agreements with adjacent jurisdictions to coordinate alerts, notifications, and messaging when a release crosses or threatens to cross jurisdictional boundaries, and to document those agreements in the unified program agency area plan. Because the bill would add to duties of a UPA and other local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/08/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 08, 2017
- Enrolled 09/13/17 - Enrolled pdf September 13, 2017
- Amended 09/01/17 - Amended Senate pdf September 01, 2017
- Amended 08/30/17 - Amended Senate pdf August 30, 2017
- Amended 05/26/17 - Amended Assembly pdf May 26, 2017
- Amended 04/27/17 - Amended Assembly pdf April 27, 2017
- Introduced 02/17/17 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2017
- AB1646 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 588, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 18. Page 3127.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 10. Page 2529.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on EQ.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 2. Page 1901.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 24).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (April 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Al Muratsuchi · Primary
- Skinner · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Muratsuchi, Al Democratic
Co-sponsors (1)
- Skinner
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 16 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 55 | 18 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 23% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Nay |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 25% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 69 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 3% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Nay |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 0% | 0% | 43% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1646 do?
- Existing law requires the Secretary for Environmental Protection to implement a unified hazardous waste and hazardous materials management regulatory program. Existing law requires every county to apply to the secretary to be certified to implement the unified program and allows a city or local agency to implement the unified program as a unified program agency, or UPA. Existing law also requires each certified UPA to institute a single fee system, which is required to include a surcharge on each person regulated by the unified program, the amount of which is determined by the secretary annually, to cover the necessary and reasonable costs of the state agencies in carrying out their responsibilities in the unified hazardous waste and hazardous materials management regulatory program. Existing law imposes certain requirements on stationary sources handling regulated substances, as defined, including, among other things, the preparation and implementation of a risk management plan. Existing law requires the UPA to review the plan and to notify the stationary source of any defects in the plan. This bill would require each local implementing agency, as defined, to develop an integrated alerting and notification system, in coordination with local emergency management agencies, UPAs, local first response agencies, petroleum refineries, and the public, to be used to notify the community surrounding a petroleum refinery in the event of an incident at the refinery warranting the use of the notification system. The bill would require the notification system to be configured, as specified, and used to alert and notify the communities surrounding a petroleum refinery, including schools, public facilities, hospitals, transient and special needs populations, as defined, and residential care homes. If an integrated alerting and notification system has not been developed and implemented by January 1, 2018, the bill would require the local implementing agency to determine an appropriate notification system to be developed consistent with these provisions and, on or before January 1, 2019, to develop a schedule for developing and implementing the notification system. The bill would require a UPA to ensure that the notification system developed is consistent with the UPA's area plan and specified regulations regarding the California Accidental Release Prevention Program. The bill would require a petroleum refinery to immediately call the emergency 9-1-1 telephone number and notify the UPA, in the event of an incident warranting the use of the notification system. The bill would require a UPA, in coordination with the local implementing agency, to establish a fee, separate from the single fee system described above, that a petroleum refinery would be required to pay in an amount to cover the reasonable and necessary costs for the design, building, and installation of the notification system, and a fee, as part of the single fee system levied on a petroleum refinery, in an amount sufficient to cover the reasonable and necessary costs for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the notification system. The bill would require the Governor's Office of Emergency Services to work with the local implementing agencies and the UPAs to develop a model memorandum of understanding between adjacent jurisdictions for integration of alerting and notification systems that will operate across jurisdictional boundaries. The bill would require the local implementing agency to ensure that there are agreements with adjacent jurisdictions to coordinate alerts, notifications, and messaging when a release crosses or threatens to cross jurisdictional boundaries, and to document those agreements in the unified program agency area plan. Because the bill would add to duties of a UPA and other local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1646?
- AB 1646 is sponsored by Muratsuchi, Al (Democratic) and Skinner.
- What is the current status of AB 1646?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1646?
- Track AB 1646 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1646
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1646
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →