State government operations: technology modernization.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2087 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2087.
You're tracking AB 2087
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2087 — State government operations: technology modernization.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Department of Technology within the Government Operations Agency, under the supervision of the Director of Technology. Existing law requires state agencies, as defined, as required by the director, to cooperate with the department in the development of an annual information technology strategic plan that guides the acquisition, management, and use of information technology. Existing law gives state agencies and entities various other responsibilities relating to their use of technology, including submission of a report on actual and projected costs of information technology, telecommunications, and information security, and development of a plan to leverage cost-effective strategies to reduce the total amount of energy utilized by information technology and telecommunications equipment, as provided. This bill would require each state agency, not later than January 1, 2020, to, in consultation with the Department of Technology, establish modernization goals that will achieve specified objectives. The bill would require those goals to include, but not be limited to, goals for modernization of the agency's information technology system and for usage of technologies that will improve the efficiency of the agency. The bill would require an agency, upon establishing those goals, to create an implementation and cost assessment plan for achieving them. The bill would define "state agency" for these purposes to include the Legislature.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/02/18 - Amended Senate Current pdf July 02, 2018
- Introduced 02/07/18 - Introduced pdf February 07, 2018
- AB2087 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 26).
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5436.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 23).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5237.)
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Coauthors revised.
-
Referred to Coms. on A. & A.R. and RLS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- Waldron · Primary
- Joe Patterson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Waldron
Co-sponsors (3)
- Bates
- Mathis
- Patterson, Joe Republican
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2087 do?
- Existing law establishes the Department of Technology within the Government Operations Agency, under the supervision of the Director of Technology. Existing law requires state agencies, as defined, as required by the director, to cooperate with the department in the development of an annual information technology strategic plan that guides the acquisition, management, and use of information technology. Existing law gives state agencies and entities various other responsibilities relating to their use of technology, including submission of a report on actual and projected costs of information technology, telecommunications, and information security, and development of a plan to leverage cost-effective strategies to reduce the total amount of energy utilized by information technology and telecommunications equipment, as provided. This bill would require each state agency, not later than January 1, 2020, to, in consultation with the Department of Technology, establish modernization goals that will achieve specified objectives. The bill would require those goals to include, but not be limited to, goals for modernization of the agency's information technology system and for usage of technologies that will improve the efficiency of the agency. The bill would require an agency, upon establishing those goals, to create an implementation and cost assessment plan for achieving them. The bill would define "state agency" for these purposes to include the Legislature.
- Who sponsors AB 2087?
- AB 2087 is sponsored by Bates, Mathis, Waldron, and Patterson, Joe (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 2087?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2087?
- Track AB 2087 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2087
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2087
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →