Private Investigator Act: license: limited liability company.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 559 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 559.
You're tracking SB 559
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 559 — Private Investigator Act: license: limited liability company.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 569, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 10 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Private Investigator Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of private investigators by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. (1) Existing law, until January 1, 2018, authorizes the bureau to issue a private investigator license to a limited liability company. Existing law, the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, authorizes a limited liability company to have any lawful purpose, except as specified, and authorizes a domestic or foreign limited liability company to render services that may be lawfully rendered only pursuant to a license, certificate, or registration authorized by the Business and Professions Code if the provisions of that code authorize a limited liability company or foreign limited liability company to hold that license, certificate, or registration. As a condition for licensure, existing law requires a limited liability company to maintain a policy or policies of insurance against liability imposed on or against it by law for damages arising out of claims based upon acts, errors, or omissions arising out of the private investigator services it provides. Under existing law, if the applicant for a license is a limited liability company, the application is required to include specified information pertaining to each managing member and any other officer or member who will be active in the licensed business. This bill, until January 1, 2021, would extend the authority for the bureau to issue a private investigator license to a limited liability company and make related conforming changes. The bill also would define terms. The bill, on and after July 1, 2018, and until January 1, 2021, would require a licensee organized as a limited liability company to report a paid or pending claim against its liability insurance to the bureau and would require the bureau to post a notice of the claim on a specified license verification Internet Web page. The bill, beginning July 1, 2018, would require an applicant for an initial license or a licensee applying for reassignment of the license to notify the bureau on the application for licensure or reassignment if the applicant or licensee is a limited liability company and would require the bureau to include this information on a specified license verification Internet Web page. (2) Existing law requires an applicant, or his or her manager, for a license as a private investigator to have had at least 3 years' experience in investigation work. Under existing law, a year's experience is required to consist of not less than 2,000 hours of actual compensated work performed by each applicant preceding the filing of an application. Under existing law, an applicant who holds a law degree or who has completed a four-year course in police science, criminal justice, criminal law, or the equivalent is required to have had 2 years' experience in investigation work. This bill would revise and recast these provisions by requiring an applicant with a law degree or bachelor's degree in police science, criminal justice, criminal law, or the equivalent to be credited with 2,000 hours of experience in investigation work. The bill would require an applicant with an associate degree in police science, criminal justice, criminal law, or the equivalent to be credited with 1,000 hours of experience in investigation work. The bill would prohibit the total amount of time credited to an applicant for these degrees from exceeding 2,000 hours of experience in investigation work. (3) This bill would make various other conforming changes.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/07/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 07, 2017
- Enrolled 09/19/17 - Enrolled pdf September 19, 2017
- Amended 09/07/17 - Amended Assembly pdf September 07, 2017
- Amended 09/05/17 - Amended Assembly pdf September 05, 2017
- Amended 07/18/17 - Amended Assembly pdf July 18, 2017
- Amended 04/24/17 - Amended Senate pdf April 24, 2017
- Amended 04/06/17 - Amended Senate pdf April 06, 2017
- Amended 03/28/17 - Amended Senate pdf March 28, 2017
- Introduced 02/16/17 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2017
- SB559 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 569, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2928.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 2. Page 3272.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (September 1).
-
August 23 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 11).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 10). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Assembly Rule 56 suspended.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.
-
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1357.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1187.) (May 25).
-
Set for hearing May 25.
-
May 15 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 15.
-
May 8 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing May 8.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 747.) (April 18).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing April 18.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 488.) (March 27).
-
Set for hearing March 27.
-
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 19.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Morrell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Morrell
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 3% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 0% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Not Voting |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 559 do?
- Existing law, the Private Investigator Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of private investigators by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services. (1) Existing law, until January 1, 2018, authorizes the bureau to issue a private investigator license to a limited liability company. Existing law, the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, authorizes a limited liability company to have any lawful purpose, except as specified, and authorizes a domestic or foreign limited liability company to render services that may be lawfully rendered only pursuant to a license, certificate, or registration authorized by the Business and Professions Code if the provisions of that code authorize a limited liability company or foreign limited liability company to hold that license, certificate, or registration. As a condition for licensure, existing law requires a limited liability company to maintain a policy or policies of insurance against liability imposed on or against it by law for damages arising out of claims based upon acts, errors, or omissions arising out of the private investigator services it provides. Under existing law, if the applicant for a license is a limited liability company, the application is required to include specified information pertaining to each managing member and any other officer or member who will be active in the licensed business. This bill, until January 1, 2021, would extend the authority for the bureau to issue a private investigator license to a limited liability company and make related conforming changes. The bill also would define terms. The bill, on and after July 1, 2018, and until January 1, 2021, would require a licensee organized as a limited liability company to report a paid or pending claim against its liability insurance to the bureau and would require the bureau to post a notice of the claim on a specified license verification Internet Web page. The bill, beginning July 1, 2018, would require an applicant for an initial license or a licensee applying for reassignment of the license to notify the bureau on the application for licensure or reassignment if the applicant or licensee is a limited liability company and would require the bureau to include this information on a specified license verification Internet Web page. (2) Existing law requires an applicant, or his or her manager, for a license as a private investigator to have had at least 3 years' experience in investigation work. Under existing law, a year's experience is required to consist of not less than 2,000 hours of actual compensated work performed by each applicant preceding the filing of an application. Under existing law, an applicant who holds a law degree or who has completed a four-year course in police science, criminal justice, criminal law, or the equivalent is required to have had 2 years' experience in investigation work. This bill would revise and recast these provisions by requiring an applicant with a law degree or bachelor's degree in police science, criminal justice, criminal law, or the equivalent to be credited with 2,000 hours of experience in investigation work. The bill would require an applicant with an associate degree in police science, criminal justice, criminal law, or the equivalent to be credited with 1,000 hours of experience in investigation work. The bill would prohibit the total amount of time credited to an applicant for these degrees from exceeding 2,000 hours of experience in investigation work. (3) This bill would make various other conforming changes.
- Who sponsors SB 559?
- SB 559 is sponsored by Morrell.
- What is the current status of SB 559?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 559?
- Track SB 559 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 559
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 559
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →