Medi-Cal managed care: quality assessment and performance improvement.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2275 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2275.
You're tracking AB 2275
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2275 — Medi-Cal managed care: quality assessment and performance improvement.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Under existing law, one of the methods by which Medi-Cal services are provided is pursuant to contracts with various types of managed care health plans, including through a county organized health system and geographic managed care. This bill would require the department to establish a quality assessment and performance improvement program for all Medi-Cal managed care plans, through which the plans, commencing January 1, 2021, would be required to meet a minimum performance level (MPL) that improves quality of care and reduces health disparities for beneficiaries, as specified. The bill would require managed care plans that meet the performance targets to receive specified financial incentives. The bill would require the department, in consultation with stakeholders, to develop a plan for a value-based financial incentive program. The bill would make the implementation of the plan subject to an appropriation of funds by the Legislature to the extent that additional funding is required to implement that plan, as specified. The bill would require the department to establish the measures by which the MPL and performance targets would be assessed and would require the measures to be collected annually, commencing July 1, 2019. The bill would also require the department to establish a public stakeholder process in the planning, development, and ongoing oversight of the program and in the planning of the financial incentive program. The bill would require the department to annually and publicly report the program results on its Internet Web site. The bill would require the department to utilize the program results to develop a Quality Rating System for Medi-Cal managed care plans, subject to federal approval. The department would not be required to report data that would result in statistically unreliable information or the disclosure of personally identifiable information, or to establish requirements mandated by the bill based solely on data that is determined to be statistically unreliable.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/29/18 - Enrolled Current pdf August 29, 2018
- Amended 07/02/18 - Amended Senate pdf July 02, 2018
- Amended 06/11/18 - Amended Senate pdf June 11, 2018
- Amended 05/25/18 - Amended Assembly pdf May 25, 2018
- Amended 04/19/18 - Amended Assembly pdf April 19, 2018
- Amended 04/09/18 - Amended Assembly pdf April 09, 2018
- Introduced 02/13/18 - Introduced pdf February 13, 2018
- AB2275 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 56. Noes 23. Page 6726.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 5590.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 16).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 20).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 23. Page 5477.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 25).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (April 17).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Joaquin Arambula · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Arambula, Joaquin Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 17 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 23 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 29% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 30% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Delgado | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 17 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 23 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 29% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Not Voting |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2275 do?
- Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which health care services are provided to qualified, low-income persons. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Under existing law, one of the methods by which Medi-Cal services are provided is pursuant to contracts with various types of managed care health plans, including through a county organized health system and geographic managed care. This bill would require the department to establish a quality assessment and performance improvement program for all Medi-Cal managed care plans, through which the plans, commencing January 1, 2021, would be required to meet a minimum performance level (MPL) that improves quality of care and reduces health disparities for beneficiaries, as specified. The bill would require managed care plans that meet the performance targets to receive specified financial incentives. The bill would require the department, in consultation with stakeholders, to develop a plan for a value-based financial incentive program. The bill would make the implementation of the plan subject to an appropriation of funds by the Legislature to the extent that additional funding is required to implement that plan, as specified. The bill would require the department to establish the measures by which the MPL and performance targets would be assessed and would require the measures to be collected annually, commencing July 1, 2019. The bill would also require the department to establish a public stakeholder process in the planning, development, and ongoing oversight of the program and in the planning of the financial incentive program. The bill would require the department to annually and publicly report the program results on its Internet Web site. The bill would require the department to utilize the program results to develop a Quality Rating System for Medi-Cal managed care plans, subject to federal approval. The department would not be required to report data that would result in statistically unreliable information or the disclosure of personally identifiable information, or to establish requirements mandated by the bill based solely on data that is determined to be statistically unreliable.
- Who sponsors AB 2275?
- AB 2275 is sponsored by Arambula, Joaquin (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2275?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2275?
- Track AB 2275 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2275
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2275
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →