California 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2622 — After School Education and Safety Program.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 265, Statutes of 2018.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the After School Education and Safety Program Act of 2002, establishes the After School Education and Safety Program to serve pupils in kindergarten and grades 1 to 9, inclusive, at participating public elementary, middle, junior high, and charter schools, as specified. Existing law requires every after school component of a program to operate a minimum of 15 hours per week and at least until 6 p.m. on every regular schoolday. Existing law prohibits a program established pursuant to the act located off school grounds from being approved unless safe transportation is provided to the pupils enrolled in the program. Existing law authorizes additional funding to be provided for transportation, as specified, if a program is operated at a schoolsite located in an area that has a population density of less than 11 persons per square mile. This bill would authorize a program that operates at a schoolsite located in an area with the above-specified low population density to end operating hours not earlier than 5 p.m. Existing law provides that each school establishing a program pursuant to the act is eligible to receive a 3-year after school grant, as provided, and establishes maximum total grant amounts for schools. Existing law requires the State Department of Education to adjust the grant level of any school within the program that is under its targeted attendance level by more than 15% in each of 2 consecutive years. Existing law also requires the department to review a program if the actual attendance level of a school within the program falls below 75% of the target attendance level in any year after the initial grant year, and to adjust the grant level as the department deems appropriate. This bill would require the department to adjust the grant level of a program that operates at a schoolsite located in an area with the above-specified low population density, for falling below 35% of its target attendance level in each of 2 consecutive years. This bill would require the department to review a program that operated in an area with the above-specified low population density, if the actual attendance level of a school within the program falls below 55%, and to adjust the grant level as the department deems appropriate. Existing law provides that after technical assistance has been provided, the department may terminate the grant of a school in a program, at any time, if the school fails for 3 consecutive years to meet either the requirement to demonstrate measurable program outcomes, or to attain 75% of its proposed attendance level after having its program reviewed and its grant level adjusted. This bill would provide that a program that operates at a schoolsite located in an area with the above-specified low population density may be terminated if the school fails for 3 consecutive years to meet either the requirement to demonstrate measurable program outcomes, or to attain 55% of its proposed attendance level after having its program reviewed and its grant level adjusted. Existing law authorizes a grantee to allocate, with approval of the department, up to 125% of the maximum total grant amount for an individual school, so long as the maximum total grant amount for all school programs administered by the program grantee is not exceeded. Existing law requires a grantee that transfers funds to have an established waiting list for enrollment and to transfer only from another school program that has met a minimum of 70% of its attendance goal. This bill would exempt, for purposes of allocating up to 125% of the maximum total grant amount for an individual school, a program that operates at a schoolsite located in an area with the above-specified low population density from the requirement to have an established waiting list for enrollment and to transfer funds only from another school program that has met a minimum of 70% of its attendance goal. This bill would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes and would correct existing law.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 265, Statutes of 2018.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6375.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 16 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 5291.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 6).

  13. Referred to Com. on ED.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5131.)

  16. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  17. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 2).

  18. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. Read second time and amended.

  20. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 11).

  21. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  23. Referred to Com. on ED.

  24. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  25. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Dahle · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Dahle

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 2622 DAHLE Concurrence in Senate Amendments

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 58000
Democratic 16000
Republican 6000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mayes — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chau — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Medina — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Burke — Yea
Fong — Yea
Salas — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Gray — Yea
Harper — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Rivas — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gabriel, Jesse Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading AB2622 Dahle By Wilk

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32003
Democratic 5000
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Delgado — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Cannella — Not Voting
Allen — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Chang — Yea
De León — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea
Stern, Henry I. Democratic Yea
Wiener, Scott D. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 2622 DAHLE Consent Calendar Second Day

Passed 73 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 52005
Democratic 15000
Republican 6000
Total 73005
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (78)
Member Party Vote
Acosta — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Holden — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Steinorth — Yea
Voepel — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Baker — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Burke — Yea
Fong — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gloria — Yea
Harper — Yea
Gray — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kamlager-Dove — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Kiley — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Cooley — Not Voting
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Cunningham — Yea
Daly — Yea
Friedman — Not Voting
Cristina Garcia — Not Voting
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Travis Allen — Not Voting
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Berman, Marc Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Cervantes, Sabrina Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Kalra, Ash Democratic Yea
Limón, Monique Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Chen, Phillip Republican Yea
Choi, Steven S. Republican Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Flora, Heath Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass. To Consent Calendar.

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 17000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Friedman — Yea
Fong — Yea
Gonzalez Fletcher — Yea
Chau — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Wendy Carrillo — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Reyes, Eloise Gómez Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety housing education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2622 do?
Existing law, the After School Education and Safety Program Act of 2002, establishes the After School Education and Safety Program to serve pupils in kindergarten and grades 1 to 9, inclusive, at participating public elementary, middle, junior high, and charter schools, as specified. Existing law requires every after school component of a program to operate a minimum of 15 hours per week and at least until 6 p.m. on every regular schoolday. Existing law prohibits a program established pursuant to the act located off school grounds from being approved unless safe transportation is provided to the pupils enrolled in the program. Existing law authorizes additional funding to be provided for transportation, as specified, if a program is operated at a schoolsite located in an area that has a population density of less than 11 persons per square mile. This bill would authorize a program that operates at a schoolsite located in an area with the above-specified low population density to end operating hours not earlier than 5 p.m. Existing law provides that each school establishing a program pursuant to the act is eligible to receive a 3-year after school grant, as provided, and establishes maximum total grant amounts for schools. Existing law requires the State Department of Education to adjust the grant level of any school within the program that is under its targeted attendance level by more than 15% in each of 2 consecutive years. Existing law also requires the department to review a program if the actual attendance level of a school within the program falls below 75% of the target attendance level in any year after the initial grant year, and to adjust the grant level as the department deems appropriate. This bill would require the department to adjust the grant level of a program that operates at a schoolsite located in an area with the above-specified low population density, for falling below 35% of its target attendance level in each of 2 consecutive years. This bill would require the department to review a program that operated in an area with the above-specified low population density, if the actual attendance level of a school within the program falls below 55%, and to adjust the grant level as the department deems appropriate. Existing law provides that after technical assistance has been provided, the department may terminate the grant of a school in a program, at any time, if the school fails for 3 consecutive years to meet either the requirement to demonstrate measurable program outcomes, or to attain 75% of its proposed attendance level after having its program reviewed and its grant level adjusted. This bill would provide that a program that operates at a schoolsite located in an area with the above-specified low population density may be terminated if the school fails for 3 consecutive years to meet either the requirement to demonstrate measurable program outcomes, or to attain 55% of its proposed attendance level after having its program reviewed and its grant level adjusted. Existing law authorizes a grantee to allocate, with approval of the department, up to 125% of the maximum total grant amount for an individual school, so long as the maximum total grant amount for all school programs administered by the program grantee is not exceeded. Existing law requires a grantee that transfers funds to have an established waiting list for enrollment and to transfer only from another school program that has met a minimum of 70% of its attendance goal. This bill would exempt, for purposes of allocating up to 125% of the maximum total grant amount for an individual school, a program that operates at a schoolsite located in an area with the above-specified low population density from the requirement to have an established waiting list for enrollment and to transfer funds only from another school program that has met a minimum of 70% of its attendance goal. This bill would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes and would correct existing law.
Who sponsors AB 2622?
AB 2622 is sponsored by Dahle.
What is the current status of AB 2622?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 15, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2622?
Track AB 2622 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2622

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2622

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →