Real estate.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2884 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2884.
You're tracking AB 2884
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2884 — Real estate.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 285, Statutes of 2018.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Real Estate Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate brokers and salespersons by the Real Estate Commissioner, the chief officer of the Bureau of Real Estate within the Department of Consumer Affairs until July 1, 2018, and thereafter the Real Estate Commissioner is the Chief Officer of the Department of Real Estate within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. A willful violation of this law and other related real estate provisions is a crime. Under existing law, a real estate broker is a person who, for a compensation or in expectation of a compensation, regardless of the form or time of payment, does or negotiates to do specified acts for another or others, including soliciting or obtaining listings of real property, as specified. Under existing law, a real estate salesperson is a natural person who, for a compensation or in expectation of a compensation, is employed by a licensed real estate broker to do specified acts. Existing law generally describes the relationship between a real estate broker and a real estate licensee, which includes brokers and salespersons, as an employment relationship. This bill would include, within those acts for real estate brokers, soliciting or obtaining a listing for that specified real property. The bill would also recast and redefine the term "salesperson" as a person who is retained by a real estate broker. For purposes of these relationships, the bill would define the term "retained" to mean the relationship between a broker and a real estate licensee who is an independent contractor affiliated with, or an employee of, a broker to perform certain real estate activities subject to a broker's supervision. The bill would also define various other terms to describe the relationships between real estate brokers and salespersons and the parties involved in the sale of real estate transactions, including, but not limited to, seller, buyer, seller's agent, buyer's agent, and dual agent. Under existing law, whenever a real estate salesperson enters the employ of a real estate broker, the broker is required to immediately notify the commissioner in writing of specified changes to employment. This bill would require a responsible broker to provide notice to the commissioner whenever a real estate salesperson or real estate broker affiliates with, or is retained by, the responsible broker or an affiliation with a real estate licensee is terminated. The bill would require a real estate broker that affiliates with a responsible broker to also provide notice to the commissioner of the affiliation, and would require a real estate licensee to provide notice to the commissioner whenever the licensee acquires a new business address. The bill would also require the commissioner to specify the manner in which these notices are to be provided. Because a willful violation of these reporting requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law makes it unlawful for any licensed real estate salesperson to pay any compensation for performing specified acts to any real estate licensee except through the broker under whom he or she is at the time licensed. This bill would authorize a licensee to enter into an agreement with another licensee to share compensation provided that the compensation is paid through the responsible broker. The bill would define a "responsible broker" as the real estate broker responsible for the exercise of control and supervision of real estate salespersons, as specified. Under existing law, when a licensee prepares or has prepared an agreement authorizing or employing such licensee to perform any of the acts for which he or she is required to hold a license, or when such licensee secures the signature of any person to any contract pertaining to such services or transaction, he or she is required to deliver a copy of the agreement to the person signing it at the time the signature is obtained. This bill would require the copy of the agreement to be delivered as soon as reasonably practicable after the time the signature is obtained. The bill would permit an electronic copy to be provided in transactions for which the parties have agreed to conduct the transaction by electronic means. Existing law requires the real estate salesperson's license to remain in the possession of the licensed real estate broker employer until canceled or until the salesperson leaves the employ of the broker, and the broker is required to make his or her license and the licenses of his salespersons available for inspection by the commissioner. This bill would repeal those requirements. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to suspend or revoke the license of a real estate licensee, delay the renewal of a license of a real estate licensee, or deny the issuance of a license to an applicant, who has committed specified acts. Existing law also authorizes the commissioner to suspend or revoke the license of a corporation, delay the renewal of a license of a corporation, or deny the issuance of a license to a corporation, if an officer, director, or person owning or controlling 10 or more of the corporation's stock has done specified acts. This bill would additionally authorize the commissioner to take such action for (A) having solicited or induced the promotional listing or listing agreement for the sale or lease of residential property on specified grounds due to the entry into the neighborhood of persons with certain characteristics and (B) for failure to surrender a license issued in error or mistake. (2) Under existing law, when a real estate license is issued to a corporation, if it desires any of its officers other than the specified designated officer to act under its license as a real estate broker, it is required to procure an additional license to so employ each additional officer. This bill would authorize a corporation, in the event of death or incapacity of a sole designated broker-officer, to operate as a licensee without interruption under its existing license if notice and an application is provided to the department within a specified period of time of the death or incapacity. Because the willful failure to provide that notice would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under existing law, each officer of a corporation through whom it is licensed to act as a real estate broker is, while so employed under that license, a licensed real estate broker, but is only licensed to act as such for and on behalf of the corporation as an officer. This bill would not preclude a designated corporate officer who has a separate individual license from conducting licensed activity for another entity if the entity for which he or she acts is clearly disclosed and apparent to any member of the public using his or her services outside the corporation. When a corporation wishes to act as a real estate broker, the bill would require the corporation to be licensed by the department through qualified broker-officers, as provided. The bill would provide that an officer of a corporation through whom it is licensed to act need not maintain an individual broker's license, but would provide that the officer is subject to all duties and responsibilities of a licensed real estate broker. Because a willful violation these requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) This bill would make numerous conforming and nonsubstantive changes. (4) This bill would make the operation of its provisions contingent on the enactment of AB 1289 relating to real estate introduced in the 2017–18 Regular Session. The bill would also specify that its provisions and AB 1289 are not to be construed to affect various duties and obligations of real estate brokers, agents, salespersons, and related persons. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/06/18 - Chaptered Current pdf September 06, 2018
- Enrolled 08/24/18 - Enrolled pdf August 24, 2018
- Amended 08/14/18 - Amended Senate pdf August 14, 2018
- Amended 06/27/18 - Amended Senate pdf June 27, 2018
- Introduced 02/16/18 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2018
- AB2884 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 285, Statutes of 2018.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6511.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5454.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 25).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & E.D. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and B., P. & E.D.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and RLS.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5217.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 9).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jacqui Irwin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Irwin, Jacqui Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 56 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Rivas | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gabriel, Jesse | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Delgado | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (78)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Not Voting |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kamlager-Dove | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Wendy Carrillo | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2884 do?
- (1) Existing law, the Real Estate Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate brokers and salespersons by the Real Estate Commissioner, the chief officer of the Bureau of Real Estate within the Department of Consumer Affairs until July 1, 2018, and thereafter the Real Estate Commissioner is the Chief Officer of the Department of Real Estate within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. A willful violation of this law and other related real estate provisions is a crime. Under existing law, a real estate broker is a person who, for a compensation or in expectation of a compensation, regardless of the form or time of payment, does or negotiates to do specified acts for another or others, including soliciting or obtaining listings of real property, as specified. Under existing law, a real estate salesperson is a natural person who, for a compensation or in expectation of a compensation, is employed by a licensed real estate broker to do specified acts. Existing law generally describes the relationship between a real estate broker and a real estate licensee, which includes brokers and salespersons, as an employment relationship. This bill would include, within those acts for real estate brokers, soliciting or obtaining a listing for that specified real property. The bill would also recast and redefine the term "salesperson" as a person who is retained by a real estate broker. For purposes of these relationships, the bill would define the term "retained" to mean the relationship between a broker and a real estate licensee who is an independent contractor affiliated with, or an employee of, a broker to perform certain real estate activities subject to a broker's supervision. The bill would also define various other terms to describe the relationships between real estate brokers and salespersons and the parties involved in the sale of real estate transactions, including, but not limited to, seller, buyer, seller's agent, buyer's agent, and dual agent. Under existing law, whenever a real estate salesperson enters the employ of a real estate broker, the broker is required to immediately notify the commissioner in writing of specified changes to employment. This bill would require a responsible broker to provide notice to the commissioner whenever a real estate salesperson or real estate broker affiliates with, or is retained by, the responsible broker or an affiliation with a real estate licensee is terminated. The bill would require a real estate broker that affiliates with a responsible broker to also provide notice to the commissioner of the affiliation, and would require a real estate licensee to provide notice to the commissioner whenever the licensee acquires a new business address. The bill would also require the commissioner to specify the manner in which these notices are to be provided. Because a willful violation of these reporting requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law makes it unlawful for any licensed real estate salesperson to pay any compensation for performing specified acts to any real estate licensee except through the broker under whom he or she is at the time licensed. This bill would authorize a licensee to enter into an agreement with another licensee to share compensation provided that the compensation is paid through the responsible broker. The bill would define a "responsible broker" as the real estate broker responsible for the exercise of control and supervision of real estate salespersons, as specified. Under existing law, when a licensee prepares or has prepared an agreement authorizing or employing such licensee to perform any of the acts for which he or she is required to hold a license, or when such licensee secures the signature of any person to any contract pertaining to such services or transaction, he or she is required to deliver a copy of the agreement to the person signing it at the time the signature is obtained. This bill would require the copy of the agreement to be delivered as soon as reasonably practicable after the time the signature is obtained. The bill would permit an electronic copy to be provided in transactions for which the parties have agreed to conduct the transaction by electronic means. Existing law requires the real estate salesperson's license to remain in the possession of the licensed real estate broker employer until canceled or until the salesperson leaves the employ of the broker, and the broker is required to make his or her license and the licenses of his salespersons available for inspection by the commissioner. This bill would repeal those requirements. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to suspend or revoke the license of a real estate licensee, delay the renewal of a license of a real estate licensee, or deny the issuance of a license to an applicant, who has committed specified acts. Existing law also authorizes the commissioner to suspend or revoke the license of a corporation, delay the renewal of a license of a corporation, or deny the issuance of a license to a corporation, if an officer, director, or person owning or controlling 10 or more of the corporation's stock has done specified acts. This bill would additionally authorize the commissioner to take such action for (A) having solicited or induced the promotional listing or listing agreement for the sale or lease of residential property on specified grounds due to the entry into the neighborhood of persons with certain characteristics and (B) for failure to surrender a license issued in error or mistake. (2) Under existing law, when a real estate license is issued to a corporation, if it desires any of its officers other than the specified designated officer to act under its license as a real estate broker, it is required to procure an additional license to so employ each additional officer. This bill would authorize a corporation, in the event of death or incapacity of a sole designated broker-officer, to operate as a licensee without interruption under its existing license if notice and an application is provided to the department within a specified period of time of the death or incapacity. Because the willful failure to provide that notice would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under existing law, each officer of a corporation through whom it is licensed to act as a real estate broker is, while so employed under that license, a licensed real estate broker, but is only licensed to act as such for and on behalf of the corporation as an officer. This bill would not preclude a designated corporate officer who has a separate individual license from conducting licensed activity for another entity if the entity for which he or she acts is clearly disclosed and apparent to any member of the public using his or her services outside the corporation. When a corporation wishes to act as a real estate broker, the bill would require the corporation to be licensed by the department through qualified broker-officers, as provided. The bill would provide that an officer of a corporation through whom it is licensed to act need not maintain an individual broker's license, but would provide that the officer is subject to all duties and responsibilities of a licensed real estate broker. Because a willful violation these requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) This bill would make numerous conforming and nonsubstantive changes. (4) This bill would make the operation of its provisions contingent on the enactment of AB 1289 relating to real estate introduced in the 2017–18 Regular Session. The bill would also specify that its provisions and AB 1289 are not to be construed to affect various duties and obligations of real estate brokers, agents, salespersons, and related persons. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2884?
- AB 2884 is sponsored by Irwin, Jacqui (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2884?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2884?
- Track AB 2884 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2884
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2884
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →