Armed service members: consumer loans.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 266 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 266.
You're tracking SB 266
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 266 — Armed service members: consumer loans.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 514, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing federal law, the Military Lending Act, prohibits a creditor who extends consumer credit to a covered member of the Armed Forces or a dependent of such a member from requiring that member or dependent to pay interest with respect to the extension of such credit, unless an exception to that rule applies. The federal act also requires a creditor to satisfy other terms and conditions before extending consumer credit to a covered member, and to comply with mandatory disclosure requirements, as specified. Any person who violates the federal act is subject to both criminal and civil penalties. Existing law, the Banking Law, prescribes the conditions pursuant to which a state-chartered bank may engage in the practice of banking. The California Credit Union Law provides for the regulation of credit unions within the state by the Commissioner of Business Oversight. Existing law imposes both criminal and civil penalties for violations of the Banking Law and the California Credit Union Law. Existing law requires a state-chartered bank or a credit union when making or extending a refund anticipation loan to comply with the provision of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 that added the Military Lending Act. Existing law, the California Finance Lenders Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of finance lenders and brokers by the Commissioner of Business Oversight. Existing law, the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law, provides for the licensure and regulation by the commissioner of persons engaged in the business of making or arranging deferred deposit transactions. A willful violation of either the California Finance Lenders Law or the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law is a crime. Existing law makes it unlawful under the California Finance Lenders Law and the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law to violate the provision of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 that added the Military Lending Act. This bill would amend the laws described above to update the references to the Military Lending Act in order to incorporate amendments to that act, and its applicable regulations. (2) Existing law provides that any person who violates specified provisions prohibiting discrimination against a member of the military or naval forces of this state or the United States, including discrimination with respect to the terms of a loan or financing based on that person's membership in the military or naval forces of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law exempts from the discrimination provisions, with respect to loans and transactions covered by the section of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 that added the Military Lending Act, any person who does not market or extend consumer loans to specified covered borrowers, and any person who does not market deferred deposit transactions to, or enter into such transactions with, specified covered borrowers. This bill would update the references to the Military Lending Act in order to incorporate amendments to that act, and its applicable regulations. (3) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 394 of the Military and Veterans Code proposed by AB 1710 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1710 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (4) Because this bill amends state statutes, the violation of which is a misdemeanor, to include references to an updated federal statute, this bill would expand the scope of existing crimes, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/05/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 05, 2017
- Enrolled 09/20/17 - Enrolled pdf September 20, 2017
- Amended 09/07/17 - Amended Assembly pdf September 07, 2017
- Amended 07/05/17 - Amended Assembly pdf July 05, 2017
- Introduced 02/08/17 - Introduced pdf February 08, 2017
- SB266 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 514, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2994.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3403.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From consent calendar on motion of Assembly Member Calderon.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 23).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
June 26 hearing postponed by committee.
-
June 19 hearing postponed by committee.
-
June 5 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 766.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing April 17.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 619.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 5.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 11.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Dodd · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Dodd
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Not Voting |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 0% | 0% | 36% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 266 do?
- (1) Existing federal law, the Military Lending Act, prohibits a creditor who extends consumer credit to a covered member of the Armed Forces or a dependent of such a member from requiring that member or dependent to pay interest with respect to the extension of such credit, unless an exception to that rule applies. The federal act also requires a creditor to satisfy other terms and conditions before extending consumer credit to a covered member, and to comply with mandatory disclosure requirements, as specified. Any person who violates the federal act is subject to both criminal and civil penalties. Existing law, the Banking Law, prescribes the conditions pursuant to which a state-chartered bank may engage in the practice of banking. The California Credit Union Law provides for the regulation of credit unions within the state by the Commissioner of Business Oversight. Existing law imposes both criminal and civil penalties for violations of the Banking Law and the California Credit Union Law. Existing law requires a state-chartered bank or a credit union when making or extending a refund anticipation loan to comply with the provision of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 that added the Military Lending Act. Existing law, the California Finance Lenders Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of finance lenders and brokers by the Commissioner of Business Oversight. Existing law, the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law, provides for the licensure and regulation by the commissioner of persons engaged in the business of making or arranging deferred deposit transactions. A willful violation of either the California Finance Lenders Law or the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law is a crime. Existing law makes it unlawful under the California Finance Lenders Law and the California Deferred Deposit Transaction Law to violate the provision of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 that added the Military Lending Act. This bill would amend the laws described above to update the references to the Military Lending Act in order to incorporate amendments to that act, and its applicable regulations. (2) Existing law provides that any person who violates specified provisions prohibiting discrimination against a member of the military or naval forces of this state or the United States, including discrimination with respect to the terms of a loan or financing based on that person's membership in the military or naval forces of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law exempts from the discrimination provisions, with respect to loans and transactions covered by the section of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 that added the Military Lending Act, any person who does not market or extend consumer loans to specified covered borrowers, and any person who does not market deferred deposit transactions to, or enter into such transactions with, specified covered borrowers. This bill would update the references to the Military Lending Act in order to incorporate amendments to that act, and its applicable regulations. (3) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 394 of the Military and Veterans Code proposed by AB 1710 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1710 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (4) Because this bill amends state statutes, the violation of which is a misdemeanor, to include references to an updated federal statute, this bill would expand the scope of existing crimes, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 266?
- SB 266 is sponsored by Dodd.
- What is the current status of SB 266?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 08, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 266?
- Track SB 266 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 266
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 266
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →