Unemployment insurance.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1695 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1695.
You're tracking AB 1695
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1695 — Unemployment insurance.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 117, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the Joint Enforcement Strike Force on the Underground Economy to combat tax violations and cash-pay employment, and requires the membership of the Strike Force to be composed of representatives of specified state agencies, including representatives from the Office of Criminal Justice Planning. Existing law abolishes the Office of Criminal Justice Planning as of January 1, 2004, and transfers all powers of the former Office of Criminal Justice Planning to the Office of Emergency Services. This bill would remove the Office of Emergency Services from the membership of the Strike Force. (2) Existing law establishes the Employment Development Department, within the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and requires the department to be administered by the Director of Employment Development. Existing law requires an employer to file with the Director of Employment Development a report of unemployment contributions and a report of wages paid to his or her workers within a specified time. Existing law authorizes employers who employ individuals to perform domestic service to file reports of wages by telephone. Existing law provides it is a violation of the unemployment insurance law for any person to, among other things, procure counsel advice, or coerce anyone to willfully make a false statement or representation, or to knowingly fail to disclose a material fact in order to lower or avoid any contribution or to avoid being or remaining subject to specified provisions of law. This bill would repeal the authorization for an employer to file reports of wages by telephone. This bill would additionally provide it is a violation for any business entity, as defined, to, among other things, procure counsel advice, or coerce anyone to willfully make a false statement or representation, or to knowingly fail to disclose a material fact in order to lower or avoid any contribution or to avoid being or remaining subject to specified provisions of law. By expanding the application of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law authorizes an additional penalty to be assessed if any person or entity fails to report amounts of paid remuneration for personal services and exempts assessments imposed under specified sections of law from this provision. This bill would delete that exemption. (4) This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to various provisions of law relating to unemployment insurance. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/24/17 - Chaptered Current pdf July 24, 2017
- Enrolled 07/06/17 - Enrolled pdf July 06, 2017
- Amended 03/20/17 - Amended Assembly pdf March 20, 2017
- Introduced 02/27/17 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2017
- AB1695 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 117, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:40 p.m.
-
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 1845.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1189.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 19).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1059.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 5).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on INS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on INS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Insurance · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Insurance
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 77 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1695 do?
- (1) Existing law establishes the Joint Enforcement Strike Force on the Underground Economy to combat tax violations and cash-pay employment, and requires the membership of the Strike Force to be composed of representatives of specified state agencies, including representatives from the Office of Criminal Justice Planning. Existing law abolishes the Office of Criminal Justice Planning as of January 1, 2004, and transfers all powers of the former Office of Criminal Justice Planning to the Office of Emergency Services. This bill would remove the Office of Emergency Services from the membership of the Strike Force. (2) Existing law establishes the Employment Development Department, within the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, and requires the department to be administered by the Director of Employment Development. Existing law requires an employer to file with the Director of Employment Development a report of unemployment contributions and a report of wages paid to his or her workers within a specified time. Existing law authorizes employers who employ individuals to perform domestic service to file reports of wages by telephone. Existing law provides it is a violation of the unemployment insurance law for any person to, among other things, procure counsel advice, or coerce anyone to willfully make a false statement or representation, or to knowingly fail to disclose a material fact in order to lower or avoid any contribution or to avoid being or remaining subject to specified provisions of law. This bill would repeal the authorization for an employer to file reports of wages by telephone. This bill would additionally provide it is a violation for any business entity, as defined, to, among other things, procure counsel advice, or coerce anyone to willfully make a false statement or representation, or to knowingly fail to disclose a material fact in order to lower or avoid any contribution or to avoid being or remaining subject to specified provisions of law. By expanding the application of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law authorizes an additional penalty to be assessed if any person or entity fails to report amounts of paid remuneration for personal services and exempts assessments imposed under specified sections of law from this provision. This bill would delete that exemption. (4) This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to various provisions of law relating to unemployment insurance. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1695?
- AB 1695 is sponsored by Committee on Insurance.
- What is the current status of AB 1695?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1695?
- Track AB 1695 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1695
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1695
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →