AB 249 — Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 546, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
27 sponsors
1 primary, 26 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (9 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Political Reform Act of 1974, provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing and activities. The act requires a committee that supports or opposes ballot measures to name and identify itself using a name or phrase that clearly identifies the economic or other special interests of its major donors of $50,000 or more. The act also requires that the identity of a common employer shared by major donors be disclosed. This bill would repeal these provisions. (2) The act defines "expenditure" as a payment, a forgiveness of a loan, a payment of a loan by a 3rd party, or an enforceable promise to make a payment, unless it is clear from the surrounding circumstances that it is not made for political purposes. This bill, which would be known as the California Disclose Act, would describe circumstances in which a payment would be made for political purposes within the meaning of the definition of "expenditure." (3) The act prohibits a candidate or committee from sending a mass mailing unless the name, street address, and city of the candidate or committee are shown on the outside of each piece of mail in the mass mailing, as specified. This bill would additionally require the name of such an entity to be disclosed in a mass electronic mailing, as defined, that the entity sends. The bill would provide that these disclosure requirements do not apply if the mass mailing or mass electronic mailing is paid for by an independent expenditure. (4) The act prohibits a candidate, committee, or slate mailer organization from expending campaign funds to pay for specified telephone calls that advocate support of, or opposition to, a candidate, ballot measure, or both, unless the name of the organization that authorized or paid for the call is disclosed to the recipient of the call during the course of each call. This bill would instead apply these requirements to a candidate, a candidate controlled committee established for an elective office for the controlling candidate, a political party committee, and a slate mailer organization that expends campaign funds to pay for such telephone calls. The bill would provide that these disclosure requirements do not apply if the telephone call is paid for by an independent expenditure. (5) The act also requires advertisements, as defined, to include prescribed disclosure statements, including, among others, a requirement that the disclosure statements include the names of the persons who made the 2 highest cumulative contributions, as defined, to the committee paying for the advertisement. This bill would repeal and recast provisions of the act relating to advertisement disclosure statements. The bill would revise the definition of "advertisement" to exclude a number of communications, including communications that involve wearing apparel, sky writing, and certain electronic media communications, as specified. The bill would also replace existing advertisement disclosure statements with newly prescribed disclosure statements that identify the name of the committee paying for the advertisement and the top contributors to that committee. The bill would define "top contributors" for purposes of these provisions as the persons from whom the committee paying for the advertisement received its 3 highest cumulative contributions, as specified. The bill would exempt certain committees, including committees that make independent expenditures totaling $1,000 or more in a calendar year, from the requirement to disclose the top contributors in advertisement disclosure statements. The bill would also prescribe location and format criteria for the disclosure statements that are specific to radio and telephone, television and video, print, and electronic media advertisements. (6) The act imposes, in addition to other penalties, a fine of up to triple the amount of the cost of an advertisement on a person who violates the disclosure requirements for advertisements. This bill would revise the scope of violations subject to that fine by specifying that it applies to certain disclosure requirements and intentional violations. (7) The act prohibits a person from making a contribution as an intermediary on behalf of another person without disclosing to the recipient of the contribution specified information about both the intermediary and the source of the contribution. The act also prohibits a person from making a contribution to a committee on the condition or with the agreement that it will be contributed to a particular candidate unless the contribution is disclosed in compliance with those requirements for contributions made by an intermediary. This bill would prohibit a person from making a contribution to a committee or candidate that is earmarked unless the contribution is disclosed in compliance with the requirements for contributions made by an intermediary. The bill would also describe circumstances in which a contribution is deemed to be earmarked. The bill would impose additional disclosure requirements in connection with earmarked contributions from one committee to another. (8) Because a violation of the act is punishable as a misdemeanor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (9) The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/07/17 - Chaptered Current pdf October 07, 2017
- Enrolled 09/19/17 - Enrolled pdf September 19, 2017
- Amended 08/29/17 - Amended Senate pdf August 29, 2017
- Amended 08/28/17 - Amended Senate pdf August 28, 2017
- Amended 08/23/17 - Amended Senate pdf August 23, 2017
- Amended 07/20/17 - Amended Senate pdf July 20, 2017
- Amended 06/20/17 - Amended Senate pdf June 20, 2017
- Introduced 01/30/17 - Introduced pdf January 30, 2017
- AB249 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 546, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 15. Page 3459.).
-
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (September 14).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 3273.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 14 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 2697.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (September 1).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (August 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
Referred to Com. on EQ.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 1188.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 5).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 2.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- De León · Cosponsor
- Portantino · Cosponsor
- Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry · Cosponsor
- Beall · Cosponsor
- Marc Berman · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Cosponsor
- Chu · Cosponsor
- Dababneh · Cosponsor
- Dodd · Cosponsor
- Friedman · Cosponsor
- Galgiani · Cosponsor
- Gloria · Cosponsor
- Timothy S. Grayson · Cosponsor
- Hill · Cosponsor
- Ash Kalra · Cosponsor
- Leyva · Cosponsor
- Levine · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Cosponsor
- Mullin · Primary
- Al Muratsuchi · Cosponsor
- Nazarian · Cosponsor
- Newman · Cosponsor
- Sharon Quirk-Silva · Cosponsor
- Henry I. Stern · Cosponsor
- Scott D. Wiener · Cosponsor
- Mia Bonta · Cosponsor
- Travis Allen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 26 co-sponsors · 95 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mullin
Co-sponsors (26)
- De León
- Portantino
- Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. Democratic
- Beall
- Berman, Marc Democratic
- Chiu
- Chu
- Dababneh
- Dodd
- Friedman
- Galgiani
- Gloria
- Grayson, Timothy S. Democratic
- Hill
- Kalra, Ash Democratic
- Leyva
- Levine
- McCarty
- Muratsuchi, Al Democratic
- Nazarian
- Newman
- Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic
- Stern, Henry I. Democratic
- Wiener, Scott D. Democratic
- Bonta, Mia Democratic
- Travis Allen Voted No
Not signed on (95)
95 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 95 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 59 | 15 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 19% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Nay |
| Kiley | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 29 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 23% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 71 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kiley | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Yea |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 249 do?
- (1) Existing law, the Political Reform Act of 1974, provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing and activities. The act requires a committee that supports or opposes ballot measures to name and identify itself using a name or phrase that clearly identifies the economic or other special interests of its major donors of $50,000 or more. The act also requires that the identity of a common employer shared by major donors be disclosed. This bill would repeal these provisions. (2) The act defines "expenditure" as a payment, a forgiveness of a loan, a payment of a loan by a 3rd party, or an enforceable promise to make a payment, unless it is clear from the surrounding circumstances that it is not made for political purposes. This bill, which would be known as the California Disclose Act, would describe circumstances in which a payment would be made for political purposes within the meaning of the definition of "expenditure." (3) The act prohibits a candidate or committee from sending a mass mailing unless the name, street address, and city of the candidate or committee are shown on the outside of each piece of mail in the mass mailing, as specified. This bill would additionally require the name of such an entity to be disclosed in a mass electronic mailing, as defined, that the entity sends. The bill would provide that these disclosure requirements do not apply if the mass mailing or mass electronic mailing is paid for by an independent expenditure. (4) The act prohibits a candidate, committee, or slate mailer organization from expending campaign funds to pay for specified telephone calls that advocate support of, or opposition to, a candidate, ballot measure, or both, unless the name of the organization that authorized or paid for the call is disclosed to the recipient of the call during the course of each call. This bill would instead apply these requirements to a candidate, a candidate controlled committee established for an elective office for the controlling candidate, a political party committee, and a slate mailer organization that expends campaign funds to pay for such telephone calls. The bill would provide that these disclosure requirements do not apply if the telephone call is paid for by an independent expenditure. (5) The act also requires advertisements, as defined, to include prescribed disclosure statements, including, among others, a requirement that the disclosure statements include the names of the persons who made the 2 highest cumulative contributions, as defined, to the committee paying for the advertisement. This bill would repeal and recast provisions of the act relating to advertisement disclosure statements. The bill would revise the definition of "advertisement" to exclude a number of communications, including communications that involve wearing apparel, sky writing, and certain electronic media communications, as specified. The bill would also replace existing advertisement disclosure statements with newly prescribed disclosure statements that identify the name of the committee paying for the advertisement and the top contributors to that committee. The bill would define "top contributors" for purposes of these provisions as the persons from whom the committee paying for the advertisement received its 3 highest cumulative contributions, as specified. The bill would exempt certain committees, including committees that make independent expenditures totaling $1,000 or more in a calendar year, from the requirement to disclose the top contributors in advertisement disclosure statements. The bill would also prescribe location and format criteria for the disclosure statements that are specific to radio and telephone, television and video, print, and electronic media advertisements. (6) The act imposes, in addition to other penalties, a fine of up to triple the amount of the cost of an advertisement on a person who violates the disclosure requirements for advertisements. This bill would revise the scope of violations subject to that fine by specifying that it applies to certain disclosure requirements and intentional violations. (7) The act prohibits a person from making a contribution as an intermediary on behalf of another person without disclosing to the recipient of the contribution specified information about both the intermediary and the source of the contribution. The act also prohibits a person from making a contribution to a committee on the condition or with the agreement that it will be contributed to a particular candidate unless the contribution is disclosed in compliance with those requirements for contributions made by an intermediary. This bill would prohibit a person from making a contribution to a committee or candidate that is earmarked unless the contribution is disclosed in compliance with the requirements for contributions made by an intermediary. The bill would also describe circumstances in which a contribution is deemed to be earmarked. The bill would impose additional disclosure requirements in connection with earmarked contributions from one committee to another. (8) Because a violation of the act is punishable as a misdemeanor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (9) The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 249?
- AB 249 is sponsored by De León, Portantino, Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (Democratic), Beall, Berman, Marc (Democratic), Chiu, Chu, Dababneh, Dodd, Friedman, Galgiani, Gloria, Grayson, Timothy S. (Democratic), Hill, Kalra, Ash (Democratic), Leyva, Levine, McCarty, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Al (Democratic), Nazarian, Newman, Quirk-Silva, Sharon (Democratic), Stern, Henry I. (Democratic), Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic), Bonta, Mia (Democratic), and Travis Allen.
- What is the current status of AB 249?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 249?
- Track AB 249 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 249
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 249
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →