Land use: zoning regulations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1505 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1505.
You're tracking AB 1505
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1505 — Land use: zoning regulations.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 376, Statutes of 2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Law authorizes the legislative body of any county or city to adopt ordinances regulating zoning within its jurisdiction, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize the legislative body of any county or city to adopt ordinances to require, as a condition of development of residential rental units, that the development include a certain percentage of residential rental units affordable to, and occupied by, moderate-income, lower income, very low income, or extremely low income households or by persons and families of low or moderate income, as specified, and would declare the intent of the Legislature in adding this provision. This bill would also authorize the Department of Housing and Community Development, within 10 years of the adoption or amendment of an ordinance by a county or city after September 15, 2017, that requires as a condition of the development of residential rental units that more than 15% of the total number of units rented in the development be affordable to, and occupied by, households at 80% or less of the area median income, to review that ordinance if the county or city meets specified conditions. The bill would authorize the department to request, and require that the county or city provide, evidence that the ordinance does not unduly constrain the production of housing by submitting an economic feasibility study that meets specified standards. If the department finds that economic feasibility study does not meet these standards, or if the county or city fails to submit the study within 180 days, the bill would require the county or city to limit any requirement to provide rental units in a development affordable to households at 80% or less of the area median income to no more than 15% of the total number of units in the development. The bill would require the department to report any findings made pursuant to these provisions to the Legislature. The bill would also declare that these provisions regarding department review of certain land use ordinances address a matter of statewide concern.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/29/17 - Chaptered Current pdf September 29, 2017
- Enrolled 09/19/17 - Enrolled pdf September 19, 2017
- Amended 09/08/17 - Amended Senate pdf September 08, 2017
- Amended 07/10/17 - Amended Senate pdf July 10, 2017
- Amended 05/30/17 - Amended Senate pdf May 30, 2017
- Amended 05/01/17 - Amended Assembly pdf May 01, 2017
- Introduced 02/17/17 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2017
- AB1505 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 376, Statutes of 2017.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 46. Noes 27. Page 3514.).
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3507.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 12. Page 2961.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (June 6).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 24. Page 1383.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 26).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Gonzalez Fletcher · Cosponsor
- Bloom · Primary
- Bradford · Cosponsor
- Chiu · Cosponsor
- Gloria · Cosponsor
- Mullin · Cosponsor
- Ting · Cosponsor
- Scott D. Wiener · Cosponsor
- Travis Allen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Bloom
Co-sponsors (8)
- Gonzalez Fletcher
- Bradford
- Chiu
- Gloria
- Mullin
- Ting
- Wiener, Scott D. Democratic
- Travis Allen
Not signed on (113)
113 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 113 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 11 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 12 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 30% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Glazer | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Newman | — | Not Voting |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Stern, Henry I. | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 31% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Not Voting |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Wiener, Scott D. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 15 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 47 | 24 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 30% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gloria | — | Yea |
| Friedman | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Rubio | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Cunningham | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Voepel | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Gray | — | Not Voting |
| Kiley | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Rodriguez | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Nay |
| Berman, Marc | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Cervantes, Sabrina | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Grayson, Timothy S. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Kalra, Ash | Democratic | Yea |
| Limón, Monique | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Nay |
| Reyes, Eloise Gómez | Democratic | Yea |
| Chen, Phillip | Republican | Nay |
| Choi, Steven S. | Republican | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Flora, Heath | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1505 do?
- The Planning and Zoning Law authorizes the legislative body of any county or city to adopt ordinances regulating zoning within its jurisdiction, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize the legislative body of any county or city to adopt ordinances to require, as a condition of development of residential rental units, that the development include a certain percentage of residential rental units affordable to, and occupied by, moderate-income, lower income, very low income, or extremely low income households or by persons and families of low or moderate income, as specified, and would declare the intent of the Legislature in adding this provision. This bill would also authorize the Department of Housing and Community Development, within 10 years of the adoption or amendment of an ordinance by a county or city after September 15, 2017, that requires as a condition of the development of residential rental units that more than 15% of the total number of units rented in the development be affordable to, and occupied by, households at 80% or less of the area median income, to review that ordinance if the county or city meets specified conditions. The bill would authorize the department to request, and require that the county or city provide, evidence that the ordinance does not unduly constrain the production of housing by submitting an economic feasibility study that meets specified standards. If the department finds that economic feasibility study does not meet these standards, or if the county or city fails to submit the study within 180 days, the bill would require the county or city to limit any requirement to provide rental units in a development affordable to households at 80% or less of the area median income to no more than 15% of the total number of units in the development. The bill would require the department to report any findings made pursuant to these provisions to the Legislature. The bill would also declare that these provisions regarding department review of certain land use ordinances address a matter of statewide concern.
- Who sponsors AB 1505?
- AB 1505 is sponsored by Gonzalez Fletcher, Bloom, Bradford, Chiu, Gloria, Mullin, Ting, Wiener, Scott D. (Democratic), and Travis Allen.
- What is the current status of AB 1505?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1505?
- Track AB 1505 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1505
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1505
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →